Main Menu
|
Nevada Classics
|
Advertise at CC
|
June 2024
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CC Advertisers
|
|
09-16-2009, 11:50 AM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Shreveport,
LA
Cobra Make, Engine: CSX4083, NOS 427 SOHC, serial number 589. Dyno'd in 1967 at 629HP with single 4v 560 Holley. Now with 4 Webers.
Posts: 295
|
|
Not Ranked
Compacted Graphite FE Block
Anyone out there with any experience with the compacted graphite blocks. Reportedly the FE block in this material can go to past 600 cubic inches. Wonder what a SOHC motor with 600 cubic inches would be like? Too much maybe?
|
-
Advertising
09-16-2009, 12:11 PM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Driftwood,
TX
Cobra Make, Engine: Contemporary Cobra, 427 side oiler
Posts: 1,850
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by Full Throttle Al
Anyone out there with any experience with the compacted graphite blocks. Reportedly the FE block in this material can go to past 600 cubic inches. Wonder what a SOHC motor with 600 cubic inches would be like? Too much maybe?
|
So THIS is what guys with SOHC motors dream of all day?
|
09-16-2009, 12:34 PM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Shreveport,
LA
Cobra Make, Engine: CSX4083, NOS 427 SOHC, serial number 589. Dyno'd in 1967 at 629HP with single 4v 560 Holley. Now with 4 Webers.
Posts: 295
|
|
Not Ranked
Yeah, but a stock SOHC motor only has 427ci and is so ho hum, a SOHC motor with 600+ci, now that will get some attention!
CSX4083
|
09-16-2009, 12:57 PM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Driftwood,
TX
Cobra Make, Engine: Contemporary Cobra, 427 side oiler
Posts: 1,850
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by Full Throttle Al
Yeah, but a stock SOHC motor only has 427ci and is so ho hum, a SOHC motor with 600+ci, now that will get some attention!CSX4083
|
This thread is nothing more than a stunt so you can show off that engine pic again.
This is a pretty good read on the subject:
http://www.competitiveproduction.com...o=3&issue_no=2
|
09-16-2009, 01:19 PM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,078
|
|
Not Ranked
Al,
Below is an article I researched and authored in '06.
COMPACTED GRAPHITE FACTS
CGI falls between gray iron and ductile in regard to material strength. Gray iron’s structure is not as strong as CGI.
The basic difference between CGI and gray iron is the shape of the interconnected graphite matrix. In a CGI matrix, the graphite is more compacted and rounded in what is referred to as “vermicular” or “worm-like” in shape.
When magnesium is added to gray iron in its molten stages the graphite shape changes to a compacted flake. During the casting process, magnesium levels must be maintained at precise levels between .010% and .012% or the casting must be scrapped. The precise control of magnesium is aided when titanium is used as an anti-nodulizing element between .1% and .2% as it increases the ability to produce CGI with higher levels of magnesium. The drawback to using ti is that it creates hard inclusions, making the part much less machinable. The percentage of ti content is very important because a small change in percentage of ti in the CGI can cut tool life in half.
Though not as strong as ductile iron, CGI is 75% stronger and up to 75% stiffer than gray iron. It’s five times more fatigue resistant than aluminum at elevated temps, and twice as resistant to metal fatigue as gray iron. The nodularity and tensile strength of CGI has been found to increase as wall-sections decrease. A CGI block can be fabricated that will be lighter than an aluminum block for equal power densities.
Unlike gray iron, CGI is a very low sulfur iron. Sulfur in iron is a lubricating layer that facilitates machining. CGI doesn’t have it. Compared with machining gray iron, tool life for milling and drilling operations in CGI are half and tool life in CGI boring operations are one-tenth. Machine tool power requirements for CGI are 10-30% higher.
Since CGI rough machines very well, there is potential that some grinding operations may eliminate other semi-finish operations, which in turn will save time in the overall process, and bring the cost down to a competitive level.
Honing abrasives: Honing stones are different for CGI than gray iron. The number of strokes and the abrasives must be tuned for your specific requirements.
The weakness of all V-engines is that there is flexing in the valley between cylinders under power. CGI strengthens this area considerably.
Users of CGI in engine blocks:
Audi, all 2.7, 3.0 V6 and 4.0 V8 diesel. BMW 7 Series V8. Hundai is using CGI in all series production blocks for 2006. Nearly all NASCAR teams are using CGI blocks or blocks with CGI liners. These liners are usually plated with a hard surface coating. Toyota’s Craftsman truck 5.8L V8 is a CGI block that weighs 195 lbs, has .118” cylinder wall thickness and makes 650HP.
12-06
I hope you conclude you DON'T want CGI. Problematic to pour, murder on machining bits and stones and the only advantage from a weight standpoint is if you redesign the molds for thinner wall thicknesses and it will not harm strength. Otherwise it's slightly heavier than an identical gray iron block. It's major advantage is it is extremely resistant to race level stress and heat level cycles which keeps the bores rounder longer. That's why the Hemi and Wedge Super Stock guys want (but can't) get them.
Do you have connections in the casting industry? You will need that and be able to afford the tooling and pattern making for redesigning the FE block to pour in CGI. Unless you're gonna run a season of Super Stock, you don't want to consider this.
Why not a 511 or 527 Cammer FE from the good builders on here?
You can easily have in the 800HP neighborhood but you gonna run that beautiful car like that?
I don't think you want CGI for the lawn chair guys.
Hope you find the info helpful.
__________________
Chas.
|
09-17-2009, 10:14 AM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago, Oscar winner, my kind of town,
Posts: 614
|
|
Not Ranked
Horrible stuff, CGI.
Stay away from it, far away, away away far back.
Factory Ford is using it in its new engines, NASCAR teams have adopted it wholeheartedly and even the European High Speed Trains use it for their brakes.
Horrible stuff. Nasty, new stuff. Next thing you know they'll think electronics can replace carbs?! And what's with all these aluminum parts? Cast iron was good enough for grandpa, steam engines and diesels, it's good enough for me!
What a bunch of stick in the mud's.
|
09-17-2009, 11:26 AM
|
|
Stolen Avitar
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Brunswick,
GA
Cobra Make, Engine: BDR 1311 428PI
Posts: 3,044
|
|
Not Ranked
BaaaaaHa ha ha ha!!!
|
09-17-2009, 02:26 PM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,078
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sizzler
Horrible stuff, CGI.
Stay away from it, far away, away away far back.
Factory Ford is using it in its new engines, NASCAR teams have adopted it wholeheartedly and even the European High Speed Trains use it for their brakes.
Horrible stuff. Nasty, new stuff. Next thing you know they'll think electronics can replace carbs?! And what's with all these aluminum parts? Cast iron was good enough for grandpa, steam engines and diesels, it's good enough for me!
What a bunch of stick in the mud's.
|
So Rocket Boy, please explain to Al (who seems to have forgotten he asked) where he can have tooling, patterns and a brimstone factory cast ONE up for him. And at what price?
I'd be surprised if Al has a Cup team's budget, or can get Motor City to start casting FE's.
__________________
Chas.
|
09-17-2009, 02:31 PM
|
|
Senior Club Cobra Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Cobra Make, Engine: KMP 539, a Ton of Aluminum
Posts: 9,588
|
|
Not Ranked
I believe Robert Pond casts compacted graphite FE blocks.
http://www.robertpondmotorsports.com/
|
09-17-2009, 02:59 PM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,078
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by RodKnock
|
Thank you Rod, I wasn't aware anyone did. I stand corrected. I see the reason he does is his Super Stock engine program. I am most familiar with the Hemi and Wedge programs.
My advice to Al still stands. He could build 1300HP in a Pond aluminum but not his 'desired' 600 inches. That would require a bore of 4.500 or greater, which CGI would allow. Then custom pistons.
Al could still get to 527 at a lesser expense. Would like to know if he just wants to build a 'bragging rights' motor.
__________________
Chas.
|
09-17-2009, 03:54 PM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Shreveport,
LA
Cobra Make, Engine: CSX4083, NOS 427 SOHC, serial number 589. Dyno'd in 1967 at 629HP with single 4v 560 Holley. Now with 4 Webers.
Posts: 295
|
|
Not Ranked
I just have another project in mind and am gathering information. With the internet and forums such as this one, no excuse for not doing your homework. If I had these resources 15 years ago when I did my Cammer project, I would have known about Berg 58mm IDA carbs (now up to 61mm).
I am not a stranger to custom machine work, the Weber manifold for my motor took more than a year to complete and required multiple send backs and I even had to send the NOS SOHC heads to the shop, something that makes me cringe when I think about it now. Here is the manifold getting final touches done, a work of art:
Anyway, just wanted to get peoples thoughts on this new technology option.
And yes, I do think a SOHC motor with more than 600 cubic inches would be something to brag about, don't you?
|
09-17-2009, 04:08 PM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,078
|
|
Not Ranked
Thanks for replying Al. I don't feel the worth of a project should be the ability to brag about it. I'd rather experience the performance.
Pump gas 1000HP 632's and 680HP 427's are abundant these days. Cammers are still impressive old technology and are exceptional at any displacement.
Best luck with what makes you happy.
__________________
Chas.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:20 AM.
|