![]() |
Well, he gone and done it. Spitzer quit.
Only question I have is why drag your wife out and make a speech to the media? Why not just a letter to the appropriate person? I cannot imagine how his Mrs. (for now) must have felt. It makes me hate the SOB more than ever. |
It won't be long, and this will blow over just like Mark Foley, and that young boy........
|
Quote:
|
Of course the difference is, Foley is not facing criminal charges. The Guv is facing Federal criminal charges, it aint gonna blow over for him.
|
:rolleyes:
Yea, he will be punished severely. Probably have to go live in Hawaii for a few years. :p Ron :LOL: |
From the WSJ, note that the article is labeled as Opinion:
OPINION Spitzer's Media Enablers By KIMBERLEY A. STRASSEL March 12, 2008; Page A21 The fall of New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer holds many lessons, and the press will surely be examining them in coming months. But don't expect the press corps to delve into the biggest lesson of all -- its own role as his enabler. Journalists have spent the past two days asking how a man of Mr. Spitzer's stature would allow himself to get involved in a prostitution ring. The answer, in my mind, is clear. The former New York attorney general never believed normal rules applied to him, and his view was validated time and again by an adoring press. "You play hard, you play rough, and hopefully you don't get caught," said Mr. Spitzer two years ago. He never did get caught, because most reporters were his accomplices. Journalism has many functions, but perhaps the most important is keeping tabs on public officials. That duty is even more vital concerning government positions that are subject to few other checks and balances. Chief among those is the prosecutor, who can use his awesome state power to punish, even destroy, private citizens. Yet from the start, the press corps acted as an adjunct of Spitzer power, rather than a skeptic of it. Many journalists get into this business because they want to see wrongs righted. Mr. Spitzer portrayed himself as the moral avenger. He was the slayer of the big guy, the fat cat, the Wall Street titan -- all allegedly on behalf of the little guy. The press ate it up, and came back for more. Time magazine bestowed upon Mr. Spitzer the title "Crusader of the Year," and likened him to Moses. Fortune dubbed him the "Enforcer." A fawning article in the Atlantic Monthly in 2004 explained he was "a rock star," and "the Democratic Party's future." In an uncritical 2006 biography, then Washington Post reporter Brooke Masters compared the attorney general to no less than Teddy Roosevelt. What the media never acknowledged is that somewhere along the line (say, his first day in public office) Mr. Spitzer became the big guy, the titan. He had the power to trample lives and bend the rules, while also burnishing his own political fortune. He was the one who deserved as much, if not more, scrutiny as onetime New York Stock Exchange chief Dick Grasso or former American International Group CEO Maurice "Hank" Greenberg. What makes this more embarrassing for any self-respecting journalist is that Mr. Spitzer knew all this, and played the media like a Stradivarius. He knew what sort of storyline they'd be sympathetic to, and spun it. He knew, too, that as financial journalism has become more competitive, breaking news can make a career. He doled out scoops to favored reporters, who repaid him with allegiance. News organizations that dared to criticize him were cut off. After a time, few criticized anymore. Instead, reporters felt obligated to run with whatever he handed them. Consider the report in the wake of a 2005 op-ed in this newspaper by John Whitehead. A respected Wall Street figure, Mr. Whitehead dared to criticize Mr. Spitzer for his unscrupulously zealous pursuit of Mr. Greenberg. Mr. Spitzer later threatened Mr. Whitehead, telling him in a phone call that "You will pay the price. This is only the beginning and you will pay dearly for what you have done." Some months later, after more Spitzer excesses, Mr. Whitehead had the temerity to write another op-ed describing what Mr. Spitzer had said. Within a few days, the press was reporting (unsourced, of course) that Mr. Whitehead had defended Mr. Greenberg a few weeks after a Greenberg charity had given $25 million to the World Trade Center Memorial Foundation -- a group Mr. Whitehead chaired. So Mr. Whitehead's on-the-record views were met with an unsourced smear implying bad faith. The press ran with it anyway. In 2005, Mr. Spitzer went on national television to suggest that Mr. Greenberg had engaged in criminal activity. It was front-page news. About six months later, on the eve of a Thanksgiving weekend, Mr. Spitzer quietly disclosed that he lacked the evidence to press criminal charges. That news was buried inside the papers. What makes this history all the more unfortunate is that the warning signs about Mr. Spitzer were many and manifest. In the final days of Mr. Spitzer's run for attorney general in 1998, the news broke that he'd twisted campaign-finance laws so that his father could fund his unsuccessful 1994 run. Mr. Spitzer won anyway, and the story was largely forgotten. New York Stock Exchange caretaker CEO John Reed suggested Mr. Spitzer hadn't told the truth when he said that it was Mr. Reed who wanted him to investigate Mr. Grasso's pay. The press never investigated. Mr. Spitzer's main offense as a prosecutor is that he violated the basic rules of fairness and due process: Innocent until proven guilty; the right to your day in court. The Spitzer method was to target public companies and officials, leak allegations and out-of-context emails to a compliant press, watch the stock price fall, threaten a corporate indictment (a death sentence), and then move in for a quick settlement kill. There was rarely a trial, fair or unfair, involved. On the substance, his court record speaks for itself. Most of Mr. Spitzer's high-profile charges have gone up in smoke. A New York state judge threw out his case against tax firm H&R Block. He lost his prosecution against Bank of America broker Ted Sihpol (whom Mr. Spitzer threatened to arrest in front of his child and pregnant wife). Mr. Spitzer was stopped by a federal judge from prying confidential information out of mortgage companies. Another New York judge blocked the heart of his suit against Mr. Grasso. Mr. Greenberg continues to fight his civil charges. The press was foursquare behind Mr. Spitzer in all these cases, and in a better world they'd share some of his humiliation. Instead, remarkably, they continue to defend him. Ms. Masters, his biographer, was on CNN the day Mr. Spitzer's prostitution news broke, reassuring viewers that the governor really was a "lovely" guy. Other news reporters were reporting what a "tragedy" it was that such a leading light in the Democratic Party could come to such an ignoble end. There's little that's tragic about Mr. Spitzer, unless you consider his victims (which would appear to include his own family). The press would do well to meditate on that, and consider how many violations they winked at and validated over the years. Politicians don't exist to be idolized by the press, at least not by any press corps doing its job. Ms. Strassel, who covered Eliot Spitzer's investigations, now writes the Journal's Potomac Watch column from Washington. |
I am quite sure that he is sorry about only one thing, getting caught. He is just one more slime ball politician that got caught with his hand in the cookie jar ( actually in this case, he got caught with his pants down :LOL:).
Wayne |
|
Courant.com
ABC to Air Prostitution News Special By DAVID BAUDER AP Television Writer 8:24 AM EDT, March 19, 2008 NEW YORK Former New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer's call girl scandal prompted ABC News to give the go-ahead to a two-hour prime-time special on prostitution that includes Diane Sawyer's visit to a legal brothel in Nevada. The "20/20" special, which airs 9 p.m. EDT Friday, has been in the works for two years. It was expected to be on sometime in May or June, but ABC moved it up because Spitzer's resignation last week put the topic in the headlines, said David Sloan, executive producer of ABC's newsmagazines. "It has taken a lot of time and I think it's going to be very provocative," Sloan said. The special's lengthy gestation did not indicate any cold feet on the part of ABC about airing it, he said. It will be on during the same week that the U.S. Supreme Court announced that it would hear a major case about broadcast indecency. On "Prostitution in America: Working Girls Speak," Sawyer interviews sex workers in poor neighborhoods outside Philadelphia and in one of Nevada's legal brothels. ABC hurriedly set up interviews with some highly paid prostitutes who work the luxury penthouses in a nod to the Spitzer scandal. The New York Democrat is accused of spending thousands of dollars on expensive prostitutes, most recently paying for a woman to travel from New York to Washington where he was spending the night. "Much of the coverage on prostitution is as a cultural phenomenon, when it's really about human beings that are in crisis," Sawyer said. "There is a lot of denial about the suffering these women experience." Sloan said the special is structured so much of the racier material is confined to the second hour. ABC speaks to experts on the issue, including columnist Nicholas Kristof of The New York Times, particularly during the first hour. "Behind every prostitute is a story of sex abuse, drug dependency or mental illness," Sloan said. "No one chooses this." He said it was a serious look at the issue, not an attempt to be salacious. "We're very proud of it," he said. courant.com/entertainment/ats-ap_entertainment10mar19,0,4901885.story |
Warren, good cartoon, I'm still chuckling. :D
|
|
:LOL:
Now Warren that is good. But why stop at $4,300. Ron :D |
Spitzer was not examined closely for another reason. He was not a Conservative. Had he been, he would have been under the microscope. Another very good example of media bias.
Uh, had he been a true conservative, he would never have gotten into this in the first place. Notice you cannot say the same thing for liberals. Mike |
I heard a news report that another highly paid prostitute has come forward saying that Spitzer was one of her clients also. Sounds like the boy got around.
Wayne |
At least he had the character to admit to it.
The American public tends to be VERY forgiving. All you have to do is say "I'm sorry." or "I made a mistake" and the media will move on. There's nothing sensational about a public official who commits a crime and then admits to it. Slick Willy, Martha Stewart, Lil' Kim, Barry Bonds.....it's like none of them read the news. If you simply say "I'm a dumbass, and I'm really sorry...." everyone will just go...okay, next story. How many people would have blamed Bill Clinton for trying to get some....look who he's married to:3DSMILE: Instead of coming out and saying..."Yep, I did it....." He tried to make his case center around the "definition of is." If there's one thing the sensationalist media era has proven to us.....you're better off telling the truth. Most of the stuff these celebrities and public officials get caught for aren't all that serious or egregious. But perjury and obstruction carry a hefty penalty. Like Barry Bonds. What an idiot. Why piss on our backs and tell us it's raining? Just admit to it. Nope. Instead, look what he's facing now. He'll be lucky if the Baseball Hall of Fame vote is his biggest worry. Now he's gonna have to worry about spending time in a California penetentuary. Brilliant.:rolleyes: Again, at least Spitzer was smart enough to just fade away. He'll probably be back. Again, the American media loves sensational stories. A guy who cheats on his wife (even a governor) and uses tax money to do it with a prosititute isn't all that exciting.....unless he denies it. At which case it becomes controversial. |
Only modification I'd make to your theory, AMF, is that they'll forgive you if you're not ugly. You don't have to be asspecially good looking...just not ugly.
|
|
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:52 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
The representations expressed are the representations and opinions of the clubcobra.com forum members and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and viewpoints of the site owners, moderators, Shelby American, any other replica manufacturer, Ford Motor Company. This website has been planned and developed by clubcobra.com and its forum members and should not be construed as being endorsed by Ford Motor Company, or Shelby American or any other manufacturer unless expressly noted by that entity. "Cobra" and the Cobra logo are registered trademarks for Ford Motor Co., Inc. clubcobra.com forum members agree not to post any copyrighted material unless the copyrighted material is owned by you. Although we do not and cannot review the messages posted and are not responsible for the content of any of these messages, we reserve the right to delete any message for any reason whatsoever. You remain solely responsible for the content of your messages, and you agree to indemnify and hold us harmless with respect to any claim based upon transmission of your message(s). Thank you for visiting clubcobra.com. For full policy documentation refer to the following link: