A class act

[J. T. Toad]

Originally Posted by meat

Nope.

This country IS great. It has been so since it's inception.

If you don't like the United States of America, you're free to go any one of the other 193 countries and live there.

Your pal,
Meat.

Si, senoir. Yo estoy muy divertido con los amigos que viva en la casa de Aztlan.
Lo siento para describir los lingustas malo.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sHdeAiulFCc

Meat,

I am sorry that you are complacent to accept the current modus which our society subscribes, votes, and legislates. I never said I didn't think this wasn't the best place to live. I agreed. What point I was trying to convey, is that we are now not as good as we were, especially considering where this country appears to be heading. If none are able to change the course whilst looking at the storm, it IS
doomed.

Don't pay your property tax, we will see who ends up moving first.


ps, it is a little insulting to call me 'your pal' as you tell me to move away due to your opinions being superior to mine.

[meat]

Originally Posted by J. T. Toad

I am sorry

Yes, indeed you are.

Originally Posted by J. T. Toad

ps, it is a little insulting to call me 'your pal'

I've never called you my pal. Never ever. Not even once.

Perhaps your belief that I have is an indication of your reading and general comprehension skills. Which would lead one to believe that - based on the empirical evidence of your posts - you can't tell the difference between past- and present- tense usage of words like 'is' and 'was.'

Which explains quite a bit about you.

Your pal,
Meat.

[J. T. Toad]

you address me directly, and sign salutations as 'your pal'?

It seems that your impression of my comprehension skills is not the only one lacking in logic or interpretation.

Might you be happier if I were to have responded with a 'won't be'?

Sheepish quoting out of context makes this dialog loose all substantive value.

My challenge to makes this country a better place by the simple statement of 'was' has turned into a semantic battle. Nice.

[meat]

Originally Posted by J. T. Toad

you address me directly,

Nope. I address everyone on the internet when I post on an open forum. If I was addressing you directly, I would have sent you a private message.

Originally Posted by J. T. Toad

and sign salutations as 'your pal'?

Nope. I close my posts with 'Your pal." Basic identification of the anatomy of a post or letter clearly identifies the opening to a post or letter as the salutation. Not the closing. Duh.

Originally Posted by J. T. Toad

It seems that your impression of my comprehension skills is not the only one lacking in logic or interpretation.

Nope. They're spot-on, and reinforced by the post I'm responding to.

Originally Posted by J. T. Toad

Might you be happier if I were to have responded with a 'won't be'?

Nope. My happiness isn't contingent on others, their responses, or their abysmal writing skills.

Originally Posted by J. T. Toad

Sheepish quoting out of context makes this dialog loose all substantive value.

Sheepish? Nope.

Out of context? Nope.

Loose? Nope.

Not sure where you were wandering off to with that there sentence, but you might want to think about not using a thesaurus to insert words you don't understand into poorly structured sentences in an attempt to look intelligent. It seems to backfire on you really badly.

Originally Posted by J. T. Toad

My challenge to makes this country a better place

Nope. You made no such challenge; you only badmouthed the country.

Originally Posted by J. T. Toad

semantic battle.

Nope. No battle - semantic or otherwise. You insulted the country, I called you on it, and you chose to attack me. And you did a p!ss-poor job of that, too; it only made you look even more foolish.

Your pal,
Meat.