![]() |
Races
nm .
|
Dick Thompson ran the Essex car at Elkhart Lake USRRC in Sep. 1965, Laguna Seca USRRC in Sep. 1965 and Riverside L.A. Times GP in Oct. 1965...
...in OA class, not AP |
Quote:
|
Essex Wire car
Quote:
|
3009
nm .
|
Uploaded a resized version to your Gallery....
..original, at ~3.5meg was too large. Gallery likes 2 meg or less; 600-800k is optimum. |
427 Webers
I had a good friend who was also a Cobra affectionado at the time and he attended the Times Grandprix at Riverside. He told me that the Essex Wire car entered both races, production and the CanAm. What really impressed everyone was that the car was pretty competitive in the CanAm race.
I suppose they could have swapped manifolds between races, but I don't know. Was there ever a 427 car sold by Shelby American equipped with Webers? My take, Webers look really cool, do they belong on an original 289 or it's replica, absolutely. Do Webers belong on an original 427 or it's replica, hell yes if you want to look cool, if you want authenticity or horsepower NO. A single plane open plenum manifold will produce more horsepower than an I/R set up because of the volume available to it, at least at 58 mm Weber flow rates. |
Seems to me the data I've seen suggests the Holley carb makes more horse power at the upper end of the rpm band than the Webers. But the Webers did better at low and mid range rpm. Single four produced 'enough hp'? An effective way to dismiss the Webers question if you ask me. Shelby went to 2X4 intake for Le Mans in an effort to increase hp over a single four! On THAT track, with it's demand for max hp I could see not using the Webers.
Dry sump because of reliability issues and not required on the small blocks? Balderdash I say! If your looking for max hp it's logical to go dry sump, and the small blocks would have benefited to that end as well. That motor in CSX3002 (the Turd?) pictured above was the first 'experimental' all alloy 390 side oiler. |
Ernie, Hows it. It would depend on the course. At Le Mans they have that long straight called "The Mulsanne that can make you or break you time wise. The fastest car on that part of the course had a distinct advantage and was usually a front runner or winner. If your talking 48s then a 4bbl seems to be the way to go. But many road courses the Webers have an edge. Their throttle response and torque gives them an edge especially in passing. Thats why Ken Miles begged for them to be put on his car. Here ya go Ernie, wanna see what the Mulsanne Straight looks like in a Porsche 956 doing 246 mph down the straight?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQbmv12s-Yk&NR=1 Enjoy, Michael |
I agree, throttle response would be a significant factor on the shorter courses, hence the desirability of Webers in such a case. No question Shelby was seeking max mph and thus hp for Le Mans. I think the target speed that MUST be achieved in 1965 or so was around 185 mph minimum. Two chicanes have been added to Le Mans in recent years to lower max mph on that long straight!
Hmmmm, I wonder what the Cobra drag race cars (289-427) preferred for the best time? No doubt they used a variety of intakes in the search for optimum performance. |
Ernie, did you watch the Le Mans video? Man that guy was flying. The trees really bring it all into perspective. I just bought that single 4bbl manifold in the photo near the top of the page. I think Im going to put my Tunnel Wedge Hi Riser intake and carbs up for sale. Havnt made up my mind completely. I may use it to rig some webers. You cant find a Hi Rise Weber manifold to save your life! Yup that Mulsanne Straight Changed the Cobra forever. The little sports car body was no match for the streamline bodies of the Gt 40 and the Daytona Coupe. I wonder how fast they had the Daytona Coupe going on that straight. I'll bet it was near 200. After watching that video I cant imagine going that fast on that course in a Cobra!! Yikes.
|
Hp
nm .
|
Quote:
You are dead wrong about your contention that a single plane manifold equipped with a Dominator has no low-end performance. I had one and have the dyno sheet to go with it. It produced more low-end torque than an 850 that was also dynoed on the same engine. The engine was very responsive on both road courses and autox events, which would be difficult if not impossible for 58 mm Webers. All this talk is cheap though, why don't you get your engine finished and share the dyno results with everyone and then demonstrate drivability at some open track events. This is a video of my car with a single 1150 cfm dominator, does it sound like there are any low speed response problems? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZaMFyZpKlo H |
Michael, yes, and impressive video!
It is quite possible the 58's do much better than the 48's. The dyno reports I've seen Webers vs Holley did show the Holley making more power at the top end. No doubt those were 48's, a much more common application. All this 'number crunching' raises another question. The typical math formulas used to calculate the size requirements of a carb don't always apply, especially when it comes to race engines. I suspect the basic problem with the carb cfm math would be found in the VE area. Volumetric Efficiency, which is incorrectly ASSUMED in many cases. Using that formula one could easily conclude a single four of modest size is optimum, as far as CFM goes. I think it is clear, certainly for an FE, that 'more is better', like 2X4 or monster 58's when it comes to absolute power. :D Work the CFM numbers for a 427 and I think you will find some where around 800 max cfm comes up! A number I just don't believe. From personal experience at the drag strip with three different size carbs (both carbs matching) I've found the best performance was around 1200 cfm (twin Holley 660's). |
Carb sizing
1600cc Formula Atlantic's used to run 50mm DCOE Webers feeding a 24.4 CID cylinder. A 58 mm Weber feeding a single 53 CID cylinder seems a little under carbureted, the more area the better to a point where velocity suffers.
A single cylinder that has a large plenum available to feed it along with multiple throttle blades will be less restricted and produce more power. |
Ernie, Yeah Im thinking that that 850 single 4bbl is going to be maxed out with the stroker I was planning. Already bought the manifold though. When you add up the flow from all ports you can see why they invented the Dominator etc.
That video was a good one. Showed the braking of an all out racer too, Did you see how much speed he was able to scrub off while approching that white porsche and just before that switchback? I mean he went from over 200 to less than 40 in no time. And it was so smooth too. Just amazing stuff. Not the best cinematography and could have used a cleaner windshield and without the glare from the dash but still it was almost like being there. What did the Hot Rod Lincoln song say ? Telephone poles passing bye like a picked fence". Thats what those trees looked like. You could sense that if you left the track at that speed, youd end up a 1000' from the pavement. I can see why people come back year after year to Le Mans. I wonder if the old cars still get a chance to use that course during the year? When it comes to setting up a car If I had my choice of anyone living or dead, I'd choose Ken Miles. If he said Webers work better than carbs Id take it to the bank. Ken passed more people than almost anyone and knew what it took to get the jump on the other driver and the choose the right angle of pursuit. I bet he used the quicker response and low end torque from those webers to edge out a lot of drivers. He was truely an amazing man and one of the worlds best drivers. Not nearly enough is ever said about him. Ok... Im off my soap box now. Michael |
Quote:
Quote:
|
I'm currently running twin 450 cfm Holleys with vacuum secondary. While a bit slower than the 660's, mpg and streetability are vastly improved over the 'full race' 660's.
|
History
nm .
|
Byots, Excelent coverage of the topic. You explained it within its historical context which to me is the most Important and interresting issue. You had to be around back in those days to understand how fluid the change was. Certainly the SA employees must have resented somewhat the intrusion of Fords execs into what was before a basicly free wheeling and open minded shop. It sounds to me those guys were encouraged to tinker with anything and everything attached to a Cobra. Can you imagine being part of that effort? I have lived here in So Ca. since '67 and no matter where you traveled back then you could see the enthusiasm and energy being poured into projects of almost every shape and size. The small shop was king and the industrial parks were their playgrounds. The Company that I worked for then dealt with lots of small machine shops throughout LA. Nearly all of them were involved in some sort of R&D. It wasnt unusual for me to be sent to pick up parts from these shops and while there youd see the employees huddled around their latest creations tinkering with them. It was Truely the golden age of manufacturing in America. We need to bring those days back. Its one of the keys that made our country great. I would have loved to see that big block Daytona run at Le Mans. I bet it would have done well. Peter Brock, you did yourself proud.
Michael |
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:21 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
The representations expressed are the representations and opinions of the clubcobra.com forum members and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and viewpoints of the site owners, moderators, Shelby American, any other replica manufacturer, Ford Motor Company. This website has been planned and developed by clubcobra.com and its forum members and should not be construed as being endorsed by Ford Motor Company, or Shelby American or any other manufacturer unless expressly noted by that entity. "Cobra" and the Cobra logo are registered trademarks for Ford Motor Co., Inc. clubcobra.com forum members agree not to post any copyrighted material unless the copyrighted material is owned by you. Although we do not and cannot review the messages posted and are not responsible for the content of any of these messages, we reserve the right to delete any message for any reason whatsoever. You remain solely responsible for the content of your messages, and you agree to indemnify and hold us harmless with respect to any claim based upon transmission of your message(s). Thank you for visiting clubcobra.com. For full policy documentation refer to the following link: