![]() |
Quote:
I was referring to my naturally aspirated 1967 dual 4-barrel tunnel port cast iron 425 CID engine vs. your Weber carb titanium rod "period engine" although they didn't have titanium rods for big blocks in 1967. I would be glad to compare dyno sheets. You would be at least 200 horsepower shy of my "monster cubic inch modern fuel injected engine" with those Webers and that comparison was certainly was not my intent. My point is that because they offered something in a speed catalog, it doesn't make it period correct unless the car came with it, and none did. Any that actually had Webers had them added after delivery. If someone had a car that had a 1960's race history with them I suppose it would be fall in the realm of the Shelby Paxton cars but just putting them on a 3000 or 3100 series car after the fact is not period correct. You could only race them in an unlimited class and I suspect those instances were very few, and related to specific cars modified by their owners. 289s could race in production class with Webers, 427's could not. What racing customer would want to go out and get beat by a bunch of lighter mid-engine cars Webers or not. Essex wire is one exception based on your history lesson. There might be others, and again if they had a history of racing with them in the 60's it would make them sort of period correct. There were several cars that were chopped up to install 427 SOHC engines in 1967, does it make them period correct because some one did it? I am waiting for that Weber powered dyno sheet. My car with the tunnel port engine and road race tires was timed at 11.20 @ 128 miles an hour at Detroit Dragway. You could also provide a time slip for your Weber engine magic cam car if you don't want to dyno it. I suppose you will be telling everyone how well 427 Cobra's handled next if only the cars were equipped with all the options that were thought about and never released. |
[IMG]10262shelbyintakeadd-me[/IMG]The Cobra was a work in Progress, Not many were delivered exactly the same way. Ive talked to original owners and comapred notes. If Shelby sold the manifolds to the general public you can bet they were installing some of them on new ordered cars. Stop the nitpicking and pi$$ing contest. If Carroll Shelby himself cant tell you what every car came with who can?
|
Nit Picking
OK got the message, since I actually had one of the very first orders for a 427 and lived through many of the problems associated with purchasing and owning these cars I thought that you might be interested in first hand experience, with engines and chassis, apparently not.
|
Forums for Enjoyment
nm .
|
3170, your not the only one to have owned an original. Ive have a friend who owned his orginal till just a few years ago. His was 3282. A street cobra. It showed up with a 428 instead of the 427 and no top! Putting all that aside Id like to remind you that people come here to relax and lose their troubles talking about the cars they love. Lets leave all the angst at the door. We all experience enough of that in our day to day lives.
By the way here is what YOU posted on the orange 3050 thread when talking about his car. """" dual 4-barrels They all did unless ordered differently"""" Cobra # 3170, THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT. People did put in special orders and they were period correct. To say they werent bastardizes all those owners who went the xtra mile with their new original Cobra. Michael |
OK...enough of the tit-for-tat.
This is a good thread with quality facts bring posted...let's keep the dialog running without side trips. Thanks ron ClubCobra Moderator |
I was looking through Sports Car Graphic, 11/65, and it lists the comp engine as having aluminum Hi-Riser heads / intake, and a 780 cfm carb, not an 850 like was stated before. The comp car in the article appears to have a carb with mechanical secondaries, as there is no vacuum dashpot for the secondaries.
If I remember correctly, I had thought that I heard that Holley designed the 850 carb, with bigger throttle bores, for the '67 L88 vette. Like you said, maybe the 850 carb was out in 1964/65. Anyways, here's the graph from weber I was eluding to earlier.. 427 has about 875 cc per cylinder. http://www.clubcobra.com/photopost/d...eber-graph.jpg |
Scg
nm .
|
Carb
nm .
|
Quote:
|
More info
nm .
|
Z_427_LEMANS_CARB_C5AF-9510-BV_NEW
Byots, can you tell which carb this is? Michael |
[img]z_427_lemans_carb_c5af-9510-bv_new[/img]
|
size
nm .
|
This is the carb. It's on Carls Fords Parts website. http://www.carlsfordparts.com/parts_...LEMANS%201.JPG
|
High Riser Engine Photo
nm .
|
Quote:
C5AF-9510-BE is listed by Holley as for a 65 427 Hi-Perf engine , # 3255 Quote:
Here is the carb stamping on the carb on my engine. http://www.clubcobra.com/photopost/d...9490carb-2.jpg |
Quote:
http://www.clubcobra.com/photopost/d...ilverstone.jpg Well, obviously the air horn has been modified, as well as the choke plate removed. I believe a 850 holley carb has bigger throttle bores and plates compared to a 780, and I am wondering if the carb pictured is a "true" 850, with larger throttle bores/plates, or simply a modified 780 for greater airflow, being labeled as a 850, which would then not be a true 850, and probably not flow like a true 850. I'll do alittle investigating. |
850 Carb Airhorns
nm .
|
Quote:
You wouldn't have a close up shot of the front of the carb? Showing the list #, date of manufacture ? |
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:00 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
The representations expressed are the representations and opinions of the clubcobra.com forum members and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and viewpoints of the site owners, moderators, Shelby American, any other replica manufacturer, Ford Motor Company. This website has been planned and developed by clubcobra.com and its forum members and should not be construed as being endorsed by Ford Motor Company, or Shelby American or any other manufacturer unless expressly noted by that entity. "Cobra" and the Cobra logo are registered trademarks for Ford Motor Co., Inc. clubcobra.com forum members agree not to post any copyrighted material unless the copyrighted material is owned by you. Although we do not and cannot review the messages posted and are not responsible for the content of any of these messages, we reserve the right to delete any message for any reason whatsoever. You remain solely responsible for the content of your messages, and you agree to indemnify and hold us harmless with respect to any claim based upon transmission of your message(s). Thank you for visiting clubcobra.com. For full policy documentation refer to the following link: