As for thread drift, I think were still on target The FE played a MAJOR roll in racing history. Like, LeMans finish 1,2 and 3 in the GT-40's in 1966 comes to mind.....
As for NASCAR:
It's BB vs SB restrictor plate history. Seems pretty obvious the reason they put "plates" on the BB was to slow them down. This would have been the first use (on a Big Block).
That was the beginning of the end for the Big Blocks, the end of an era. They down sized the motor, but had no restrictor plate rule for them. To save the racers money? OK, I can see that, with the added benefit of slowing the cars! NASCAR is always trying to balance things for the fans and the racers.
Tony George, Indy 500 race track owner and IRL "head man" "down sized" the Indy car rules primarily as a way of saving the racers "money", and he made the right call. I don't think "speed" was an issue in his case.
Some years later, in an effort to slow down the cars AGAIN the restrictor plate rule was "back", this time for the small blocks.
That was ALL about "speed".
Which was more important? Slow the cars or make it cheaper? Why not both? But clearly the restrictor plate rule, BB or SB was about slowing the cars.
NASCAR if now faced with a new monster. Winston is pulling out, the cost of "raceing" is out of control. Something MAJOR will have to happen to save it as we know it today.
They should invite Tony George over for a chat.......
Ernie
NOTE: When Chrylser had to "drop" the Hemi and move away from the car, they KNEW they were done! They virtually dropped out of racing at the same time. They had nothing else that could touch the Fords. The "wing cars" that came later was a last ditch effort to regain their former years of "glory".
Interesting cars, but I always did think they were "cheating". But hey, "back in the day", everybody did that!!! Smoky Yunick and his Chevys with the "hollow roll bars" that held extra gas??? Now THAT was stepping over the line!! They had to watch that guy like a hawk!
