|
small block?
Hey Guys,
I don't want to come off as a smart arse, but, since when did a "427" become a "small block"? |
Ever since the deck height was that of a 351 Windsor.
Small Block - DH = 8.2 inches, Medium Block (Windsor) - DH = 9.5 inches, Big Block (FE) - DH = 10.17 Bob |
Hi,
While that may be true, with the advent of stroker kits, it doesn't fit within the essence of what the small block was really about. Ask anyone, 289 vs 427, which is considered a small block? Typically, most of the guys I travel with, who all happen to be FORD guys, think of the traditional SBF as a 260, 289, 302, yes maybe the 352, but, not when we have the stroker kits that boost the CIs to 408 and beyond. Again, when I open the SBF portal, and as one who wants to offer some modicum of my experience in design and build of "SBFs" for maximum performance, I don't to wade thru the mega blocks beyond the 351. But hey, that's me. I can easily drift on to another forum. BTW, my 289/333 makes a comfy 392 RWHP @ 5900 with 401 RWTQ @ 4400, and was designed and assembled by me. Happy Trails to those that care. |
Having a bit of a bad start to the new year Ken?
I do not know a whole lot about Fords but I do about Chevys. In a Chevy there is a complete differance between a SB and a BB and it has nothing to do with CI. |
I would say in the old days when Ford needed an economical engine with 260 to 351 CI they would use their standard "smaller" engine block design. When Ford wanted more than 360 CI engine with more power, it was most economic/reliable to switch to a heavier duty block, AKA big block design. The added power required the extra strength of the thicker block, etc and the extra weight was more than made up for by the increase in power. As the strength of materials improved and the demand for less weight and more HP for performance, engineers came up with smaller blocks (like the Dart racing block) that could reliably withstand the forces required of 450 CI in a lighter better designed block. The Dart racking block may be referred to a small block, it is much different in terms of strength and reliability. If you take a standard SBF and stroke it to 400 CI, you are taking advantage of the extra capacity Ford wanted in their reliable SB engine. Ford didn't do it, but many Cobra owners have done it and are very happy with the results. It is the same technology advancements we see in every facet of progress. That's my opinion and I'm biased.
|
Quote:
By your own definition, the guys that you travel with would consider your 333 out of the "typical" range. And I'm sure that they would consider my 445 and 460 cubic inch Windsors out of the range as well..... Quote:
|
The 352 is, in fact, a true "big block" and not a version of the 221/260/289/302 engines.
|
The 352 is an FE big block engine (DH=10.17) just like the 390, 406, 427, 428. The 351 windsor (same bore and stroke as the 352) is a medium block (DH=9.5). The 221, 260, 289 and 302 are small blocks (DH=8.2)
It's all about the deck height. Bob |
And just to confuse everyone, a 4.6 and the latest 'Coyote' 5.0 has an exterior dimension that would do a big-block lover proud until they realize their internal cubic inch chambers are that of a small block. Then you get kind of deflated. :D
|
Well I will point out that the FE (commonly called a big block) started life as a 332 cid, nearly a decade before the small block Ford was designed. The FE was not considered a big block it was just the only engine made for a while. So for those who are hung up on cid, is the 331 FE a small block?
Now the SB Ford was introduced with 221 cid. Then was upped to 260 cid, followed by the 289, and finally the 302. So if you are such a purest on displacement, why are you running 333 cid instead of the 221 that started the whole SB movement? Your 333 cid engine has more cubic inches than the original FE !!! So by your reasoning you have a BB. |
Interesting= so I have a MBF 359 [+.040] I'm going with this on my entry sheets this summer. This will cause some head scratching. :D
Lou |
Ok I seem to be in a $hit stirring mood - bored maybe.
289/302 8.206 deck height & 4.380 bore spacing 351C 9.213 deck height & 4.380 bore spacing 351W 9.480 deck height & 4.380 bore spacing 427/428 FE 10.17 deck height & 4.630 bore spacing 429/460 10.30 deck height & 4.900 bore spacing 400M 10.302 deck height & 4.380 bore spacing So where should the SB / BB line be drawn? Or do we need to look at the bore spacing? |
You mean Small Block guys have this discussion all by themselves?
:cool: |
Wow! Got quite a stir going on, it seems. I guess the whole SB/BB definition needed an airing out. Thanks to all who chimed in their comments. "Olddog" good post!
Happy Motoring guys! |
Well I dont know about anyone else but I at least learned something from this post. Thanks Ken for bringing it up.
|
you all might want to look at the table in the Wikipedia article on the FE engine.
|
Quote:
These days the guys that favor small blocks due to budget or perceived weight constraints like to justify the badges on the side of the car by targeting the 427 cubic inch displacement. There is a bit of marketing magic in there... That oughta get a bunch of small block guys upset with me (as I duck under the table....beer in hand :) ) |
It's because the Ford (and Chevy) 427 engines were essentially the pinnacle of high performance in the 60's. The stuff dreams and memories were made of.
Pinnacle: The highest level or degree attainable; the highest stage of development. IMHO there is really one "pinnacle of high performance in the 60's", that would be the 427 SOHC. The leaky FE just doesn't measure up to the SOHC :LOL: |
this is the way i look at it:
289=early mustang 302=bigger mustang 351c=attempt at a race motor 351w=mule later to become bigger mule 352=truck 360=truck 390=truck 391=bigger truck 400=my dad's station wagon 427=race engine 428=my neighbor's t-bird 429=bad mustang 460=bigger t-bird 500=caddy fe=turd lol |
oh dear! lmao
|
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:15 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
The representations expressed are the representations and opinions of the clubcobra.com forum members and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and viewpoints of the site owners, moderators, Shelby American, any other replica manufacturer, Ford Motor Company. This website has been planned and developed by clubcobra.com and its forum members and should not be construed as being endorsed by Ford Motor Company, or Shelby American or any other manufacturer unless expressly noted by that entity. "Cobra" and the Cobra logo are registered trademarks for Ford Motor Co., Inc. clubcobra.com forum members agree not to post any copyrighted material unless the copyrighted material is owned by you. Although we do not and cannot review the messages posted and are not responsible for the content of any of these messages, we reserve the right to delete any message for any reason whatsoever. You remain solely responsible for the content of your messages, and you agree to indemnify and hold us harmless with respect to any claim based upon transmission of your message(s). Thank you for visiting clubcobra.com. For full policy documentation refer to the following link: