Club Cobra

Club Cobra (http://www.clubcobra.com/forums/)
-   Small Block Talk (http://www.clubcobra.com/forums/small-block-talk/)
-   -   cfm (http://www.clubcobra.com/forums/small-block-talk/72002-cfm.html)

347 08-14-2006 04:15 AM

cfm
 
What is the CFM rating a single 44 idf weber?

My 347 has a 650dp, rpm air gap, 10.1 comp, 238/248@.050 solid flat tappet, 4.1 rear ,tremec, weekend cruiser.

If I was to change the 650dp over to twin 44idf's would I increase torque? hp? Or is it not worth the trouble?

Hankcar 08-14-2006 08:58 AM

Idf
 
why not go with something like this
http://www.twminduction.com/v8_kits/v8_kits-FR.html
Quote:

Originally Posted by 347
What is the CFM rating a single 44 idf weber?

My 347 has a 650dp, rpm air gap, 10.1 comp, 238/248@.050 solid flat tappet, 4.1 rear ,tremec, weekend cruiser.

If I was to change the 650dp over to twin 44idf's would I increase torque? hp? Or is it not worth the trouble?


347 08-19-2006 06:57 PM

I would like to but I dont have the dollars.

Does anybody have any input or suggestions?

dlampe 08-20-2006 08:15 AM

My 48 IDA's flow aroung 330 per barrell but go to individual runners. It doesn't sound like you have an individual runner set up. I think the IR setup is where the torque is created. If your 2 carbs are on a plenum shared by all cylinders, then I doubt you will see a big difference in torque. That is just my guess. It would still look cool!:D

David Hodgson 08-20-2006 11:56 PM

Given the Webers tunability, I would expect you would see some good improvements in torque and HP, but mainly driveability. The Webber can be tuned precicely right through the rev range where as a Holley is limited to main jet and pump squirters, unless of course you get one modified.

nanard289 08-26-2006 05:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 347
What is the CFM rating a single 44 idf weber?

My 347 has a 650dp, rpm air gap, 10.1 comp, 238/248@.050 solid flat tappet, 4.1 rear ,tremec, weekend cruiser.

If I was to change the 650dp over to twin 44idf's would I increase torque? hp? Or is it not worth the trouble?

Weber CFM depends mainly of your ventury size (335 cfm for my 48IDF with 42mm venturis). Not sur that a Weber change will increase torque at low rpm significantly. Usually, Weber advantages are mainly between the middle to top end (according to your camshaft characteristics, I believe that expected Weber benefit will be between 4000 to 6500+ rpm). However, a 44IDF works well for a 289/302 engine but for a 347cid I think that a 48IDF with 40mm ventury will be more efficient.
Everybody agree that a good exhaust collector have to be designed with each pipe in the same length to be efficient. I believe that this rule is also applicable to the inlet manifold ;)


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:48 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
The representations expressed are the representations and opinions of the clubcobra.com forum members and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and viewpoints of the site owners, moderators, Shelby American, any other replica manufacturer, Ford Motor Company. This website has been planned and developed by clubcobra.com and its forum members and should not be construed as being endorsed by Ford Motor Company, or Shelby American or any other manufacturer unless expressly noted by that entity. "Cobra" and the Cobra logo are registered trademarks for Ford Motor Co., Inc. clubcobra.com forum members agree not to post any copyrighted material unless the copyrighted material is owned by you. Although we do not and cannot review the messages posted and are not responsible for the content of any of these messages, we reserve the right to delete any message for any reason whatsoever. You remain solely responsible for the content of your messages, and you agree to indemnify and hold us harmless with respect to any claim based upon transmission of your message(s). Thank you for visiting clubcobra.com. For full policy documentation refer to the following link: