 
Main Menu
|
|
Nevada Classics
|
|
Advertise at CC
|
| S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
| |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
| 7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
| 14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
| 21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
| 28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
CC Advertisers
|
|
|
10 result(s) to your search. (designs)
|
·
|
|
cobrajeff
Sun August 24, 2003 7:20am
Rating: 10
|
Detomaso Mangusta
One of the most stunning designs of all time.
|
|
cobrajeff
Sun November 21, 2004 6:47am
Rating: 10
|
Weber Guages
Two on top left hold float to proper height; two lower left are for measuring float level. Top right is tang-bending tool, lower right is to measure fuel inlet needle setting. (center tools perform same functions as the two on left, just slightly different designs).
|
|
Ludwigsen
Wed April 25, 2007 5:56am
|
Ludwigsen Designs new Hardtop
Here's a sneak peak of my new hardtop,(Design Patent Pending,USPTO). The molds are just about complete, and the website should be up and running in about a week. Enjoy.
Daniel Ludwigsen
|
|
Ludwigsen
Tue August 7, 2007 8:00pm
Rating: 10
|
cobratop_083
Ludwigsen Designs hardtop
|
|
hogster
Thu May 1, 2008 8:32pm
|
Bad_Gas_171
Mildura plasma cut designs....100cm x 60cm
|
|
hogster
Thu May 1, 2008 8:32pm
|
Bad_Gas_172
Mildura plasma cut designs....100cm x 60cm
|
|
kitcarbp
Fri March 6, 2009 7:29am
Rating: 9
|
Ford_Raditor_Heat_Rejection_Chart- Street Rod Example
This chart compares the heat rejection rate (cooling capacity) of three different types of radiators tested on an old Ford Street Rod. Coolant flow rate is held constant at 7 gpm (typical flow at idle perhaps, not sure where its being measured ???). It graphs the heat rejection for each radiator versus air flow through the radiator core. It is comparing 3 diff rad designs/materials at different CFMs through the core. The more air flow you have for a given coolant flow rate (7 gpm in this example) , the higher the heat rejection, basically linear in this example. The author of this graph is most likely selling the high efficiency radiator showing the improvement over the other two designs. To sum it up, the radiator at the top of the chart appears to be the most efficient at a low coolant flow rate (7 gal/min) over all air flows tested. Ya see how important rad core/tank design is? I learned something here.
|
|
testresources
Sun May 17, 2015 10:06pm
|
Metal Testing Equipment
Metal Testing Equipment
TestResources’ innovative manufacturing methods combined with extensive engineering experience allow us to focus on the application needs of every customer. We fit the test machine to your budget and test requirements, rather than the other way around. By pulling from our vast inventory of tester designs, controllers, and software packages our engineers configure the best test equipment for your material type and form.
|
|
Dan Case
Fri August 11, 2017 7:13am
Rating: 10
|
1963 design vs both 1964 designs on engine
|
|
Dan Case
Thu April 18, 2019 3:28pm
Rating: 10
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:05 PM.
Links monetized by VigLink |
