
greg schroeder
Mon February 5, 2007 2:37pm
|
3rd gear data
3rd gear G-tech data vs. changes Superformance 2040 with Roush 427R-095
The power values represented are G-tech HP. This should not be confused with any other method of testing HP. It's only a number of reference.
Just as wheel HP on a chassis dyno is lower than flywheel HP because of additional drive line loss, the G-tech HP is lower than chassis dyno due to additional resistance such as aero drag and road resistance, even amount of air in tires would have a factor. As speed increases aero drag as well as other rolling resistance increase. For example as an estimate @ 50 mph there is an equivalent of approximately -12 HP, @ 100 mph -90 HP, @ 130 mph right about -200 HP for the shape of the Cobra.
|
|

fkemmerer
Sun January 20, 2008 10:23am Rating: 10
|
Blown and Injected SBC
An example of the type of radical induction that can be run on the street with EFI. This is a 383 ci SBC which makes 625 HP on pump gas.
|
|

fkemmerer
Mon June 23, 2008 2:31pm
|
Rebuilt fender flare
Examples of Ron Randall's outstanding body and paint work on my ERA Cobra.
|
|

fkemmerer
Mon June 23, 2008 2:31pm
|
Guide coat before blocking
Examples of Ron Randall's outstanding body and paint work on my ERA Cobra.
|
|

kitcarbp
Fri March 6, 2009 7:29am Rating: 9
|
Ford_Raditor_Heat_Rejection_Chart- Street Rod Example
This chart compares the heat rejection rate (cooling capacity) of three different types of radiators tested on an old Ford Street Rod. Coolant flow rate is held constant at 7 gpm (typical flow at idle perhaps, not sure where its being measured ???). It graphs the heat rejection for each radiator versus air flow through the radiator core. It is comparing 3 diff rad designs/materials at different CFMs through the core. The more air flow you have for a given coolant flow rate (7 gpm in this example) , the higher the heat rejection, basically linear in this example. The author of this graph is most likely selling the high efficiency radiator showing the improvement over the other two designs. To sum it up, the radiator at the top of the chart appears to be the most efficient at a low coolant flow rate (7 gal/min) over all air flows tested. Ya see how important rad core/tank design is? I learned something here.
|
|

kitcarbp
Thu March 19, 2009 10:30am Rating: 10
|
500+ HP Engine Water Jacket Coolant Flow Requirements
This chart shows the linear relationship between the heat rejection (load) of the coolant and the required (calculated) coolant flow in the engine water jacket. It is determined for 3 different temp gradients of the engine inlet and outlet coolant temp. This engine example is from a 500+ horsepower supercharged gas engine assumed to have heat rejection up to maximum power (8,000 btu/min). Why do we care? If you cant keep engine temps under control at speed under load, you may have: 1) insufficient water flow, 2) undersized radiator, or 3) insufficient air flow through the radiator that needs to be addressed. This engine will require coolant flow in the lower part of the curve in street applications (low heat rejection), but for racing/track use this engine will require coolant flow rates towards the top of each curve. For older V8's pre-emissions, the common design target is to keep the radiator Inlet @ 190 F and outlet @ 180F or an average core temp of 185F at steady state conditions or the upper curve shown. Modern engines may use a little higher 195F-185F or rad core avg temp of 190F.
|
|

CowtownCobra
Sat April 4, 2009 7:29am Rating: 10
|
San Marcos 2009
Confederate Airforce P39 Airacobra, said to be the last flyable example in existence
|
|

Maurice Butler
Sun May 10, 2009 1:55am Rating: 10
|
Lock wiring
Lock wiring examples
|
|

Big Oil
Fri June 17, 2011 10:00am Rating: 10
|
Silver Mink Paint examples
Silver Mink Paint examples
|
|

Big Oil
Fri June 17, 2011 10:00am Rating: 10
|
Silver Mink Paint examples
Silver Mink Paint examples
|
|

CompClassics
Wed January 27, 2016 8:55am Rating: 10
|
Products RACEWHERE has to offer
Partial example of the products that RACEWHERE has to offer the 289 Cobra enthusiast.
|
|

Dangerous Doug
Thu February 25, 2016 1:38pm
|
Racing Windscreen -- Cobra: The First 40 Years T.Legate
Example of a 90's Cobra racing windscreen from Trevor Legate's "Cobra: The First 40 Years", page 213.
|
|

Dan Case
Fri March 9, 2018 7:27am Rating: 10
|
CSX2431 stoneguard example 1964-65
|
|

Dan Case
Fri March 9, 2018 12:38pm Rating: 10
|
Example of original versus authorized factory replacements
|
|

Anthony
Mon May 11, 2020 6:08am Rating: 10
|
1965 Dodge Coronet W051 Super Stock
An original 1965 Dodge Coronet Super Stock. Dodge produced 101 examples, as did Plymouth, for a total of 202 super stocks for 1965. This car was ordered, purchased in the Cleveland, Ohio area by Harm Friend. He campaigned this car for 5 years at numerous local tracks, one year competing in the nationals, losing in 6th round by red lighting. Harm set a national AHRA record with this car in 1969. He ran mid to high ‘11’s in the upper 120’s . He initially named this car “Man from Mopar”. He then renamed it “ N Harm’s Way” , based off of the John Wayne movie. He sold the car in 1969 with 84 original miles. Now, the car has 116 original miles.
All Dodges carried the serial number beginning with W051****. The corresponding Plymouth's had serial number R051*****. The super stock option was listed as A990, so the Dodge cars are referred to either as W051's, or A990's. In 1964, the Dodge / Plymouth Super Stocks were built with a cast iron block / head 426 cross ram hemi, and with fiberglass and aluminum body panels to lighten the cars. As Ford was also producing cars with lightweight parts, NHRA decided to make a new rule stipulating that for 1965, all super stocks had to be built with "stock" steel body panels. So Chrysler redesigned the Super Stocks for 1965, by substituting aluminum heads and water pumps on the 426 Race Hemi's, and lightening up the steel body panels by acid dipping the fenders, doors, hood, to reduce the car weight back to that of the 1964's, class minimum weight of about 3400 lbs. Truly a work of art !!!!
|
|