speed220mph
Mon October 21, 2002 2:35pm
Rating: 9.5
|
Strange stable mates
Things look considerably different under the hoods. Carburetors vs. f.i., lots of accessories vs. none, Ford versus Chevrolet . . . good old American horsepower and fun.
|
|
cobrajeff
Tue December 28, 2004 12:33pm
Rating: 10
|
C4 Servos
Comparison of "H" versus "R" Intermediate Servos for Ford C4 transmission
|
|
cobrajeff
Tue December 28, 2004 12:35pm
Rating: 10
|
C4 Servos
Comparison of "C" (largest ever made for C4) Intermediate Servo versus "H" (second largest).
|
|
cobrajeff
Tue December 28, 2004 12:37pm
Rating: 10
|
C4 Servos
Comparison of original "C" Intermediate Servo (on left) versus reproduction "C" Servo (note same part numbers, but no Ford oval on the repro).
|
|
Xavier
Sun January 21, 2007 8:23pm
Rating: 10
|
The saga of the starter from hell...
OEM versus powermsater...both wrong.
|
|
1985 CCX
Tue July 3, 2007 9:47am
Rating: 10
|
CCX versus ERA ass.......
|
|
1985 CCX
Sun December 21, 2008 9:27am
|
Original 60's screens
Was lucky to find these original side mount screens. These were the type used in the 60's which differ by full winding of the screen versus tack weld to the ring and no pop snaps, they mount via SS side brackets and funky knobs.
|
|
kitcarbp
Fri March 6, 2009 7:29am
Rating: 9
|
Ford_Raditor_Heat_Rejection_Chart- Street Rod Example
This chart compares the heat rejection rate (cooling capacity) of three different types of radiators tested on an old Ford Street Rod. Coolant flow rate is held constant at 7 gpm (typical flow at idle perhaps, not sure where its being measured ???). It graphs the heat rejection for each radiator versus air flow through the radiator core. It is comparing 3 diff rad designs/materials at different CFMs through the core. The more air flow you have for a given coolant flow rate (7 gpm in this example) , the higher the heat rejection, basically linear in this example. The author of this graph is most likely selling the high efficiency radiator showing the improvement over the other two designs. To sum it up, the radiator at the top of the chart appears to be the most efficient at a low coolant flow rate (7 gal/min) over all air flows tested. Ya see how important rad core/tank design is? I learned something here.
|
|
lal Naja
Sat July 24, 2010 10:48am
|
Jaguar IRS modifications
Advantages of this design versus the Watts design?
|
|
super
Tue November 5, 2013 12:53pm
|
AC-Pedals
comparison - old versus new, reworked situation
|
|
Dan Case
Fri March 9, 2018 12:38pm
Rating: 10
|
Example of original versus authorized factory replacements
|
|
