Quote:
Originally Posted by Thor maine
Well said!
|
Well, we can say anything on the Internet and cannot be proven wrong, since there's no verifiable data to support what any of us say.
The only person who quoted something, anything, that was 100% correct is EZ$:
Quote:
Originally Posted by EZ$
Been sitting here reading the thread, and debating if I wanted to respond. When I read the discussion of the 1.2 to 1.4 hp/ci being a .85% increase I just couldn't not respond. That difference is actually a 17% increase, .2 divided by 1.2 = .17 or 17%. Since I have no knowledge of the differences between GM & Ford engines, (don't care, long term Ford guy), I'll go away now.
|
We'll ignore the double negative.
