Steve,
Ron,
There is other evidence as well, but very few people on this forum seem interested in reading it - I have posted it before. Some comes from the UN team sent in before the war, some comes from our own government reports.
There is plenty from the ISG that cites some of these reports, and if somebody wants to slog through it it can be very educational.
However, despite the majority of evidence indicating that Hussein had nothing that would constitute WMD, there is still no way to prove that he did not as you cannot prove a negative.
I am not arguing with you but I have read so much
evidence from so many absolutely reliable sources that completely contradicts what each is saying that I am sceptical of any of them reporting the complete truth. I agree that I haven't seen any evidence of WOMDs discovered since we invaded, but given the warning he had and all of the stuff Syria now has, I still believe he shipped a lot of it to them. However I can't prove that and reading a dozen or so absolutely factual reports to me is a useless waste of time. Search long enough and you can find some factual report saying about anything you want. From now on I believe maybe 1/4th of what I read in the reports, less than that in the news media, about 1/3rd of what I hear from
reliable sources, and very little of what I see as I figure that can be faked also.
Ron
