
09-17-2010, 11:50 AM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Indianapolis, Indiana, U.S.A.,
IN
Cobra Make, Engine: Home built, supercharged 544cu/in automatic
Posts: 924
|
|
Not Ranked
Mostly been said right in the posts above. But my votes for chassis numbers when I am trying to figure things out regarding how a car actually runs. For example when I switched to a glide from a built T.H. 400 I gained about 35 horses across the board. Gained about 8 horses across the board by changing my rear end housing over from a big bearing to small bearing setup. That latter setup also had a much more stout housing BTW. There is something to be said about rolling resistance numbers too. I never think about peak numbers, only compaired numbers. Personally, I think peak numbers are worthless and flywheel numbers are only good on a inital fireup and cursory tune of a new engine. Of couse there is the added cost of continued visits to your local chassis dyno shop to consider if using that method ,,,,,,,,,,,
__________________
Ron Shockley
Last edited by cobrashoch; 09-17-2010 at 12:05 PM..
Reason: spelling and minor content
|