 
Main Menu
|
Nevada Classics
|
Advertise at CC
|
| S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
| |
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
| 3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
| 10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
| 17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
| 24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
| 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CC Advertisers
|
|

10-04-2012, 01:04 PM
|
 |
Half-Ass Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Cobra Make, Engine: ERA #732, 428FE (447 CID), TKO600, Solid Flat Tappet Cam, Tons of Aluminum
Posts: 22,025
|
|
Not Ranked
Now I am not sure of this, but I think I recall chatting with Peter about the big brakes up front and, at that time, I'm pretty sure that if you upgraded the brakes up front that you also had to upgrade the Jag in-board brakes as well, which ERA no longer does (according to their web site). I didn't put a lot of thought in to it because I was going with the out-board braked rear that already had the larger brakes. BUT, had I gone with the regular Jag rear, and the upgraded Sierras up front (now Wilwood), then upgrading the in-board Jag brakes was the strong recommendation. Peter did not want big brakes up front with the standard Jag brakes on the back. Again, I'm kind of foggy on it all though....
|

10-04-2012, 01:27 PM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Bay Area (Peninsula),
CA
Cobra Make, Engine: ERA 427, 427/487 side-oiler
Posts: 1,248
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by patrickt
Now I am not sure of this, but I think I recall chatting with Peter about the big brakes up front and, at that time, I'm pretty sure that if you upgraded the brakes up front that you also had to upgrade the Jag in-board brakes as well, which ERA no longer does (according to their web site). I didn't put a lot of thought in to it because I was going with the out-board braked rear that already had the larger brakes. BUT, had I gone with the regular Jag rear, and the upgraded Sierras up front (now Wilwood), then upgrading the in-board Jag brakes was the strong recommendation. Peter did not want big brakes up front with the standard Jag brakes on the back. Again, I'm kind of foggy on it all though....
|
I spoke with Peter. You can do Wilwoods in front and Jag in the rear. But you can't do big brakes in rear with standard in front.
|

10-04-2012, 01:32 PM
|
 |
Half-Ass Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Cobra Make, Engine: ERA #732, 428FE (447 CID), TKO600, Solid Flat Tappet Cam, Tons of Aluminum
Posts: 22,025
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by lippy
I spoke with Peter. You can do Wilwoods in front and Jag in the rear. But you can't do big brakes in rear with standard in front.
|
OK, if it was me in your shoes, I wouldn't go with the big brakes right now as I know you're watching the pennies. If the rattling really bugs you (and I don't know if Chas is just pulling your leg on that or not), then doing the upgrade is not that hard. Here are the instructions for the big brake conversion: http://www.erareplicas.com/427man/br...conversion.pdf
|

10-04-2012, 02:50 PM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,078
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by patrickt
If the rattling really bugs you (and I don't know if Chas is just pulling your leg on that or not), then doing the upgrade is not that hard.
|
I would NOT joke with a statement like that-and make a guy spend money on a joke. I only talk about and recommend what I've done-not what I've read.
I went from bolt-on wheels and GM brakes with Jag to Wilwoods and big rotors-which had pin drive hubs. Doug made the modified spindles and sent the units. Then had Doug make up a pin drive hat and unit for the rear uprights. Then put everything in on jackstands. I then modified the rear Girlings and ventilated them. Very effective paired with the big fronts.
Believe me when I say-they shifted and clacked-also glazed on the first 100 MPH stab of the brake. That 'expert's tale' about 'they were fine on the much heavier Camaro' is a crock. It's seems logical until you measure the piston area and rotor sizes.
The guys that like the GM's aren't driving their cars hard enough.
You may not either which is why I agreed with Pat about going GM for you. But it's not an elegant solution.
__________________
Chas.
|

10-04-2012, 02:52 PM
|
 |
Half-Ass Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Cobra Make, Engine: ERA #732, 428FE (447 CID), TKO600, Solid Flat Tappet Cam, Tons of Aluminum
Posts: 22,025
|
|
Not Ranked
OK, what's the cost differential between the stock brakes and the upgrade to Wilwoods?
|

10-04-2012, 04:10 PM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Bay Area (Peninsula),
CA
Cobra Make, Engine: ERA 427, 427/487 side-oiler
Posts: 1,248
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by patrickt
OK, what's the cost differential between the stock brakes and the upgrade to Wilwoods?
|
It's about $1,100 more. And now I think they use Coleman calipers, and not Willwoods.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:49 AM.
Links monetized by VigLink
|