 
Main Menu
|
Nevada Classics
|
Advertise at CC
|
| S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
| 2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
| 9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
| 16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
| 23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
| 30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CC Advertisers
|
|
3Likes

03-22-2015, 11:04 AM
|
 |
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: St. Lucia, West Indies,
WI
Cobra Make, Engine: Unique 427SC 383 stroker
Posts: 3,786
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nedsel
And Buzz, "de-restored" is an interesting term. But you can't have a de-restored car if it is original, can you?
|
Hi Ned - De-restored in that it was "retrogressed" to the original paint from the newer state when the blue paint job was scraped away with blades or whatever he actually used. To me, the value of doing that was questionable because the scraped-up gold paint is nowhere near original in appearance and the car has actually been artificially made to look in worse condition than it would have had it been simply left alone. Not that it matters, but it seems to me they've molested the hell out of this unmolested Cobra.
In a top flight Corvette for example, practically every single detail and part of a given model/year is factory documented and cataloged for reference. Re: the valve covers, etc. - can one surmise that Cobra production was much less exacting or consistent and thus leaves far more leeway in assessing "original condition"?
__________________
Tropical Buzz
Grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, the strength to change the things I can, and the wisdom to know the difference. -(wasn't me)
BEWARE OF THE DOGma!! Dogmatism bites...
Last edited by Buzz; 03-22-2015 at 11:27 AM..
|

03-22-2015, 11:36 AM
|
 |
Senior CC Premier Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: SoCal,
CA
Cobra Make, Engine: CSX #4xxx with CSX 482; David Kee Toploader
Posts: 3,574
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buzz
In a top flight Corvette for example, practically every single detail and part of a given model/year is factory documented and cataloged for reference. Can one surmise that Cobra production was much less exacting or consistent and thus leaves far more leeway in assessing "original condition"?
|
"Far more leeway", yes. These cars were not built in an assembly plant in Detroit. These were basically custom built hot rods and race cars.
I have said it before...If you could line up 30 S/C cars every one would have something different about them, even as they rolled out of the SAI shop in '65 and '66. If I am wrong, I am sure someone will correct me. 
__________________
All that's stopping you now Son, is blind-raging fear.......
|

03-22-2015, 11:53 AM
|
 |
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Vero Beach,
FL
Cobra Make, Engine: COX 6111 - '66 "AC 289 Sports."
Posts: 1,572
|
|
Not Ranked
Ok, I will correct you. Every Cobra had a bill of materials associated with its build. Cars within production groups had changes in specifications as better products came on line. But there is a Materials List for the S/C cars that did not vary, except in the case of specially-ordered cars. Hence the S/C cars were all built to the same specs, using the same parts, and varying only in color or, in very rare instances, special equipment (such as "quieter exhaust" if you can imagine that).
__________________
Ned Scudder
|

03-22-2015, 12:05 PM
|
 |
Senior CC Premier Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: SoCal,
CA
Cobra Make, Engine: CSX #4xxx with CSX 482; David Kee Toploader
Posts: 3,574
|
|
Not Ranked
Thanks for straightening me out Sir! 
__________________
All that's stopping you now Son, is blind-raging fear.......
|

03-22-2015, 06:49 PM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Cobra Make, Engine: 31XX Car
Posts: 374
|
|
Not Ranked
Variations
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bernica
"Far more leeway", yes. These cars were not built in an assembly plant in Detroit. These were basically custom built hot rods and race cars.
I have said it before...If you could line up 30 S/C cars every one would have something different about them, even as they rolled out of the SAI shop in '65 and '66. If I am wrong, I am sure someone will correct me. 
|
Ned made the basic point well, I will just add that there were some variations, but they tended to follow typical rational related to any manufacturing operation. For example, on a small end of the scale my 427 street car had one throttle linkage rod end that was a different manufacturer from the rest, as the parts purchasing person obviously bought some from a different supplier that was functionally equivalent and they were mixed in together.
One style of steering wheel center cap was seen exclusively on early big block street cars and then within a range of chassis numbers you see those alternating with a new black style, then late production had pretty much exclusively that new style. The chassis number range where it could have been either style was obviously where the new ones were mixed in the box with whatever remained of the old ones.
Speedo reversers were used on all the early cars because when Ford engineers modified the parts list of the Galaxy toploader to make the Cobra transmission, they erroneously left the Galaxy speedo drive gear on the output shaft when they went to the shorter tail housing that had the speedo cable coming out on the opposite side. Shelby's people told AC about the issue early on and AC had Smiths develop the counterclockwise speedo to eliminate the reverser. The reverser is then accordingly absent on some cars in the middle of production with the counterclockwise speedo. Then Ford obviously caught on to their mistake and started putting the Mustang speedo drive gear in the Cobra transmissions, which forced Shelby American to put reversers back on the cars in late production.
The sand cast valve covers mentioned on 3047 were used on most of the 32XX series cars, but you will find a few early 32XX cars that did not have then because the sand cast ones were not available yet.
In some situations the buyer ordered something different that may have been done at Shelby American, but that was usually noted on the invoice so the customer would pay the extra cost. There are countless stories on variations, but the common theme is there is systematic rational for what went on that was tied to production time periods, not just random build-em as the assembly line guy wanted.
Last edited by DMXF; 03-22-2015 at 06:52 PM..
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:18 AM.
Links monetized by VigLink
|