Why do GT40 replicas cost so much more than replica AC Cobras?

[RodKnock]

The cheapest SPF Cobra roller on the Hillbank site is $57,000, but I assume that a base roller (no options) is slightly cheaper. The SPF GT40 roller is $110,000. So, the SPF GT40 roller is roughly 2x the cost of an SPF Cobra roller.

I just don't think the GT40 reproduction is $53,000+ more complex than a Cobra replica. Certainly other replica GT40 companies can reproduce their GT40 copies for roughly half the cost.

[twobjshelbys]

Originally Posted by RodKnock

The cheapest SPF Cobra roller on the Hillbank site is $57,000, but I assume that a base roller (no options) is slightly cheaper. The SPF GT40 roller is $110,000. So, the SPF GT40 roller is roughly 2x the cost of an SPF Cobra roller.

I just don't think the GT40 reproduction is $53,000+ more complex than a Cobra replica. Certainly other replica GT40 companies can reproduce their GT40 copies for roughly half the cost.

It's also about factory utilization. The overall GT40 is much more complicated to manufacture. It is easy to estimate that building a single GT40 at HiTech takes twice as long as a Cobra. So if you look at factory $, it's roughly equal. (2 Cobras per GT40). Thus the factory loading is equal. That's the simple model. Actual numbers are likely within a small variation of that but not 5x.

[RodKnock]

Originally Posted by twobjshelbys

The overall GT40 is much more complicated to manufacture. It is easy to estimate that building a single GT40 at HiTech takes twice as long as a Cobra.

I assume that's an opinion and not fact. How do you know that it takes twice as long? The GT40 is a more complicated roller to build, as I said above, I just don't think it's $53,000 more expensive to build a roller.

However, Rick (Mark IV) knows the production schedules of a Cobra and GT40 roller, but labor in South Africa isn't the same as UAW. There's more materials, but RCR can build a roller for $42,000 in Michigan. The SPF GT40 is a better GT40, and comes with better parts, but is it $60,000 better?

[Mark IV]

Originally Posted by RodKnock

I assume that's an opinion and not fact. How do you know that it takes twice as long? The GT40 is a more complicated roller to build, as I said above, I just don't think it's $53,000 more expensive to build a roller.

However, Rick (Mark IV) knows the production schedules of a Cobra and GT40 roller, but labor in South Africa isn't the same as UAW. There's more materials, but RCR can build a roller for $42,000 in Michigan. The SPF GT40 is a better GT40, and comes with better parts, but is it $60,000 better?

Whether it is $60K better is up to the buyer BUT you can't compare production costs of the RCR with the SPF. Lets look at these items:

1) Roof- SPF; double wall steel stamped in matched metal dies on a 600 ton press. RCR; Fiberglass made in a mold. I know RCR does first class glass work but I assure I can make hundreds of FRP molds for the cost of a metal stamping die.

2) Chassis- SPF is coated steel that is laser cut, some pieces are stamped to shape, other are rolled, press brake formed, etc. Steel is then placed in a jig and spot welded, mig welded and gas welded to form. RCR is flat aluminum CNC cut to shape, jigged and welded.

Uprights- SPF are cast alloy and then machined. RCR are CNC machined. Casting patterns are not cheap.

There is no "economy of scale" for either manufacturer, 2-6 cars per month don't provide any real savings. And while the wage scale in port Elizabeth may not equal the UAW, it is nowhere as cheap as you may think. Plus the 30 plus paid holidays, etc. and there is less savings than you might expect.

And also in that $60K difference remember the SPF is a roller.....painted, trimmed and fully assembled. Brakes are bled, the wiring is all done, etc. And you get the exhaust, the A/C, the wheels, etc. So the real cost difference is much less. How much does a good quality paint job cost?

Again, taking NOTHING away from RCR. I know Fran and they make a nice car. It comes down to what you want and if you want to build it.

[RodKnock]

Originally Posted by Mark IV

Whether it is $60K better is up to the buyer BUT you can't compare production costs of the RCR with the SPF. Lets look at these items:

1) Roof- SPF; double wall steel stamped in matched metal dies on a 600 ton press. RCR; Fiberglass made in a mold. I know RCR does first class glass work but I assure I can make hundreds of FRP molds for the cost of a metal stamping die.

2) Chassis- SPF is coated steel that is laser cut, some pieces are stamped to shape, other are rolled, press brake formed, etc. Steel is then placed in a jig and spot welded, mig welded and gas welded to form. RCR is flat aluminum CNC cut to shape, jigged and welded.

Uprights- SPF are cast alloy and then machined. RCR are CNC machined. Casting patterns are not cheap.

There is no "economy of scale" for either manufacturer, 2-6 cars per month don't provide any real savings. And while the wage scale in port Elizabeth may not equal the UAW, it is nowhere as cheap as you may think. Plus the 30 plus paid holidays, etc. and there is less savings than you might expect.

And also in that $60K difference remember the SPF is a roller.....painted, trimmed and fully assembled. Brakes are bled, the wiring is all done, etc. And you get the exhaust, the A/C, the wheels, etc. So the real cost difference is much less. How much does a good quality paint job cost?

Again, taking NOTHING away from RCR. I know Fran and they make a nice car. It comes down to what you want and if you want to build it.

Don't get me wrong, if I were in the market, then I'd buy the SPF. It's the better GT40 replica for me, because it's better made and properly shaped compared to its competitors. But I just think $60,000 buys you a lot of assembly, parts, labor, paint, etc., if someone desired an RCR.

Ultimately, a GT40 replica was not for me because it's just too confining and gave a me a claustrophobic feel that I didn't like.

[G-Pete]

Originally Posted by RodKnock

but RCR can build a roller for $42,000 in Michigan. The SPF GT40 is a better GT40, and comes with better parts, but is it $60,000 better?

Fran don't offer a roller for $42k. It is a kit - that rolls around. You still have to assemble the car - SPF -> Drivetrain in and you're done. Same with CAV.

It's like you build a car with one hand (writing a check) or with both hands...

I can afford one, but prefer both.hehe

[RodKnock]

Originally Posted by G-Pete

Fran don't offer a roller for $42k. It is a kit - that rolls around. You still have to assemble the car - SPF -> Drivetrain in and you're done. Same with CAV.

It's like you build a car with one hand (writing a check) or with both hands...

I can afford one, but prefer both.hehe

Thanks Pete. I knew that, but somehow forgot that the $42,000 didn't include assembly and paint.

Now that makes the SPF GT40 roller cheap!

[buddyg]

Originally Posted by G-Pete

Fran don't offer a roller for $42k. It is a kit - that rolls around. You still have to assemble the car - SPF -> Drivetrain in and you're done. Same with CAV.

It's like you build a car with one hand (writing a check) or with both hands...

I can afford one, but prefer both.hehe

More pics please!

[Mark IV]

Originally Posted by buddyg

More pics please!

OK...Oh, did you want pics of THAT car?

[Dwight]

[trularin]

I figured I might add to this.

Fran will ship you parts - not a roller for the $42k. There is an element of fun visiting his shop as there are some serious vehicles there.

When I compared the superformance with the RCR, the RCR is and was a better GT40. My opinion. The saleman will now do the hard sell after this post, that is fine...he will express his opinion and he gets money when you buy.

Take the 42K and add 18K for engine, 13K for ZF trans. Then, there is the "stuff that makes it work".

Depending on what you want, just keep adding on dollars. Dwight got a deal on his trans. And if you want Porsch racing, it is more like 22k for the trans.

So, these items give you an idea.

Tru

[Mark IV]

Originally Posted by trularin

When I compared the superformance with the RCR, the RCR is and was a better GT40. My opinion. The saleman will now do the hard sell after this post, that is fine...he will express his opinion and he gets money when you buy.

I assume I am the "salesman" you refer to? I agree, the RCR was the better car in "your opinion" for YOU. I defy you or anyone to find where I have denigrated another product (with the exception of scam builders)

I was not aware that my posts are seen as "hard sell"...I rather thought they were just opinionated comments and presentations of information.

And are you telling me Fran does not get paid when you purchase his product? That seems to be a new business paradigm I am not familiar with.

[Jaydee]

The GT40 must be my second favorite car in the world, but one, I can't afford it, I'm to tall and I would also feel a little claustrophobic in one. What about if you could just buy the whole shell, put some nice wheels on it, no real suspension or engine etc. And then you could just use it to look at and go broom broom. Or push it out onto your front lawn and make the whole neighborhood jealous.
JD