Club Cobra Keith Craft Racing  

Go Back   Club Cobra > Cobra Talk Areas > ALL COBRA TALK

Keith Craft Racing
Nevada Classics
MMG Superformance
Main Menu
Module Jump:
Nevada Classics
Nevada Classics
MMG Superformance
Advertise at CC
Banner Ad Rates
Keith Craft Racing
November 2025
S M T W T F S
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            

Kirkham Motorsports

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-04-2008, 05:18 AM
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: E BRUNSWICK N.J. USA,
Posts: 3,841
Not Ranked     
Default 1 question about round verves rectangler tubing

Silverback 51 From all the reading of the old days with cobras, the issue was about frame flex. I think the issue was that round tubing could bend and TWIST easier than rectangle tubing of say 2" by 4". This is my understanding of the issue. Is there a formula about this? IMO this is why Nascar builds there cars with round tubing for the roll cages. It's easier to work with cheaper to buy, lighter the rectangle, and it bends to absorb an accident easier than rectangle and still hold its strength. I believe that the main frame on nascar is still rectangler tubing. I also think that alot of the round tubing built cars have gone to a thicker wall tubing to cut down on the issue we are talking about. Twist and flex. Rick L.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-04-2008, 05:52 AM
ddcobra's Avatar
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Cobra Make, Engine:
Posts: 333
Not Ranked     
Default

You can't compare a 2 rail chassis to a bird cage style like Kikham,CSX,and D&D.
Don,
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 06-04-2008, 06:26 AM
Silverback51's Avatar
Senior Club Cobra Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Covington, wa
Cobra Make, Engine: Superformance # 532, 466 BB, 560HP
Posts: 3,029
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RICK LAKE View Post
Silverback 51 From all the reading of the old days with cobras, the issue was about frame flex. I think the issue was that round tubing could bend and TWIST easier than rectangle tubing of say 2" by 4". This is my understanding of the issue. Is there a formula about this? IMO this is why Nascar builds there cars with round tubing for the roll cages. It's easier to work with cheaper to buy, lighter the rectangle, and it bends to absorb an accident easier than rectangle and still hold its strength. I believe that the main frame on nascar is still rectangler tubing. I also think that alot of the round tubing built cars have gone to a thicker wall tubing to cut down on the issue we are talking about. Twist and flex. Rick L.
Just so you don't think I'm ignoring you, I will answer your questions when I get home after work.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 06-04-2008, 03:47 PM
Silverback51's Avatar
Senior Club Cobra Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Covington, wa
Cobra Make, Engine: Superformance # 532, 466 BB, 560HP
Posts: 3,029
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RICK LAKE View Post
Silverback 51 From all the reading of the old days with cobras, the issue was about frame flex. I think the issue was that round tubing could bend and TWIST easier than rectangle tubing of say 2" by 4". This is my understanding of the issue. Is there a formula about this? IMO this is why Nascar builds there cars with round tubing for the roll cages. It's easier to work with cheaper to buy, lighter the rectangle, and it bends to absorb an accident easier than rectangle and still hold its strength. I believe that the main frame on nascar is still rectangler tubing. I also think that alot of the round tubing built cars have gone to a thicker wall tubing to cut down on the issue we are talking about. Twist and flex. Rick L.
The strong point of a round tube in torsion is that the stress value is the same along it's outer most surface. That is why we have round drivelines, axles, half shafts, etc.. With a square, rectangular, or other shape of structural material the stresses will be concentrated at the outermost fibers where the shape is changing.

Most of the strength of a round shaft is at it's most outer surface. That is why drivelines are always hollow. The closer you get the center, the less strengh is gained by the material in the center. Why are axles solid? Generally because there is less packaging room for a large diameter hollow shaft.

Here is a link to the formula for a round shaft. The formula changes for different structural shapes.

http://www.instron.us/wa/resourcecen...rm.aspx?ID=173

Needless to say, the design of a frame is very complex. And the most efficient design will be a combination of different structural shapes that are choosen to satisfy the stress loads that it's being subjected to.

Take a look at the NASCAR frames. As you pointed out they consist of rectangular main rails and the rest of the frame is mostly different sizes of round tubes.

Now take a look at a top fuel dragster. It's all small diameter round tubing. Different requirements dictate different material shapes and designs. The dragster is a truss design that also allows a great deal of flex in one direction to allow maximum weight transfer for straight line traction. The NASCAR frame is designed with different requirements, so that design is completely different.

Hope that answers your questions.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
The representations expressed are the representations and opinions of the clubcobra.com forum members and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and viewpoints of the site owners, moderators, Shelby American, any other replica manufacturer, Ford Motor Company. This website has been planned and developed by clubcobra.com and its forum members and should not be construed as being endorsed by Ford Motor Company, or Shelby American or any other manufacturer unless expressly noted by that entity. "Cobra" and the Cobra logo are registered trademarks for Ford Motor Co., Inc. clubcobra.com forum members agree not to post any copyrighted material unless the copyrighted material is owned by you. Although we do not and cannot review the messages posted and are not responsible for the content of any of these messages, we reserve the right to delete any message for any reason whatsoever. You remain solely responsible for the content of your messages, and you agree to indemnify and hold us harmless with respect to any claim based upon transmission of your message(s). Thank you for visiting clubcobra.com. For full policy documentation refer to the following link: CC Policy
Links monetized by VigLink