 
Main Menu
|
Nevada Classics
|
Advertise at CC
|
| S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
| 2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
| 9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
| 16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
| 23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
| 30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CC Advertisers
|
|
|
View Poll Results: Money aside, which chassis would you choose?
|
|
Original 4" Chassis with Original Tubular suspension
|
  
|
55 |
35.71% |
|
Original 4" Chassis with Kirkham Billet Aluminum Suspension
|
  
|
33 |
21.43% |
|
New Kirkham Billet Chassis with Billet Pushrod Suspension
|
  
|
54 |
35.06% |
|
Original 3" Chassis with Leafspring Suspension
|
  
|
12 |
7.79% |

06-10-2008, 06:58 PM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 4
|
|
Not Ranked
I voted billet but I was curious about what the difference in weight is between the billet and tubular stainless chassis. That was also using your assumption that the price would remain the same between the two. With the difference in price I would opt for the stainless chassis with billet suspension components.
I can't wait to see what kind of original car the masterminds of Kirkham come up with. My guess is it will set the industry on its ear. All I ask is don't stop making Cobras (at least until I can afford one).
|

06-10-2008, 07:18 PM
|
 |
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Provo,
Ut
Cobra Make, Engine: Kirkham, 427
Posts: 6,990
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by goof2
I voted billet but I was curious about what the difference in weight is between the billet and tubular stainless chassis. That was also using your assumption that the price would remain the same between the two. With the difference in price I would opt for the stainless chassis with billet suspension components.
I can't wait to see what kind of original car the masterminds of Kirkham come up with. My guess is it will set the industry on its ear. All I ask is don't stop making Cobras (at least until I can afford one).
|
The weight difference between a stainless chassis and a steel chassis is around 20 pounds. The difference between our billet chassis and the original chassis is about 20 pounds as well. The problem is, I can't remember which car (steel or stainless) we compared the billet chassis to!
I will have to go back an look at the numbers...or, just wait until we drive it here in a few days.
David
  
|

06-10-2008, 10:48 PM
|
 |
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Cobra Make, Engine: Kirkham #492/ 427/482 Keith Craft. Simple, Clean.
Posts: 114
|
|
Not Ranked
Old School
David,
As you know, I am a bit of a novice, notwithstanding considerable research into the deep, dark recesses of the dysfunctional cobra world. Notwithstanding, I have to say that being able to relate to others that the frame is 'tube,old school' goes a long way.
As someone already thinking about a 'second' Kirkham (I have two boys), I would opt for tube, steel. Old School.
But about those magnesium wheels......
al
__________________
VNMS 65
|

06-11-2008, 06:09 PM
|
 |
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Provo,
Ut
Cobra Make, Engine: Kirkham, 427
Posts: 6,990
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by alpace@pacificp
David,
As you know, I am a bit of a novice, notwithstanding considerable research into the deep, dark recesses of the dysfunctional cobra world. Notwithstanding, I have to say that being able to relate to others that the frame is 'tube,old school' goes a long way.
As someone already thinking about a 'second' Kirkham (I have two boys), I would opt for tube, steel. Old School.
But about those magnesium wheels......
al
|
From the poll I can see we aren't going to be throwing the tooling for the original chassis away any time soon
I'm glad to see there are a lot of people who love the billet stuff as well. Funny, when we started, every one wanted everything as original as possible, right down to a date coded dip stick! "Date coded; man I haven't heard that word in a long, long time!
David
 
David
  
|

06-11-2008, 08:51 PM
|
 |
Senior Club Cobra Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Folsom,
CA
Cobra Make, Engine: ERA 623, 427 S/C Cobra. Ford FE 428 Cobra Jet, Ford Nascar TL 4speed - with a touch of raw; "less is more" theme
Posts: 3,887
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Kirkham
From the poll I can see we aren't going to be throwing the tooling for the original chassis away any time soon
I'm glad to see there are a lot of people who love the billet stuff as well. Funny, when we started, every one wanted everything as original as possible, right down to a date coded dip stick! "Date coded; man I haven't heard that word in a long, long time!
David
  
|
Looking at it from a different (maybe stupid) angle... If this situation became a "this or that, but not both options type of decision", I'd be curious what the vote results would be if you asked all of your existing KMP Cobra owners if they (hypothetically) could trade their existing tube chassis cars for billet chassis cars straight across, with no chance to ever obtain or purchase a tube chassis car again, what would they actually vote for?
__________________
Duane
Western States Cobra Group 1998-2016.
|

06-11-2008, 09:00 PM
|
 |
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Greenville,sc,
SC
Cobra Make, Engine: Kirkham 427 (KMP 266); CAV GT40
Posts: 1,464
|
|
Not Ranked
no trade here
__________________
SPF Daytona coupe 055, Roush 427R
|

06-11-2008, 09:31 PM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 4
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Kirkham
The weight difference between a stainless chassis and a steel chassis is around 20 pounds. The difference between our billet chassis and the original chassis is about 20 pounds as well. The problem is, I can't remember which car (steel or stainless) we compared the billet chassis to!
I will have to go back an look at the numbers...or, just wait until we drive it here in a few days.
David
  
|
No need to look back on my account as it is all academic for me at this point anyway. I had assumed the difference in weight would have been on the order of 100 to 200 pounds. For the tuneability and responsiveness that should result from the 300% increase in stiffness I would deal with the extra 40 pounds. If 40 pounds were that big a deal I would loose the weight myself.
|

06-11-2008, 10:27 PM
|
 |
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Provo,
Ut
Cobra Make, Engine: Kirkham, 427
Posts: 6,990
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by goof2
No need to look back on my account as it is all academic for me at this point anyway. I had assumed the difference in weight would have been on the order of 100 to 200 pounds. For the tuneability and responsiveness that should result from the 300% increase in stiffness I would deal with the extra 40 pounds. If 40 pounds were that big a deal I would loose the weight myself.
|
I've often thought while working on this billet chassis how much easier it was to remove weight from the car than it was to remove weight from my middle!
David
  
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:36 PM.
Links monetized by VigLink
|