 
Main Menu
|
Nevada Classics
|
Advertise at CC
|
| S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
| |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
| 7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
| 14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
| 21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
| 28 |
29 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
CC Advertisers
|
|

10-06-2008, 09:10 PM
|
 |
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2001
Location: California,
Ca
Cobra Make, Engine: NAF 289 Slabside Early Comp Car with 289 Webers and all the goodies. Cancelling the efforts of several Priuses
Posts: 6,592
|
|
Not Ranked
patrickt:
Good article here: http://www.circletrack.com/enginetec...nts/index.html
By the way EOS is again available at GM dealers, the formula may not be the same though (???)
__________________
Rick
As you slide down the Banister of Life, may the splinters never be pointing the wrong way
Last edited by Rick Parker; 10-07-2008 at 07:25 AM..
Reason: Trying to learn how to spell???
|

10-07-2008, 04:53 AM
|
 |
Half-Ass Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Cobra Make, Engine: ERA #732, 428FE (447 CID), TKO600, Solid Flat Tappet Cam, Tons of Aluminum
Posts: 22,025
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Parker
|
Good article, thanks. The new GM EOS still has quite the ZDDP, but the detergents have changed. I fear the new formulation is more directly targeted at engine break-in rather than extending the life, and zinc/phosphorous content, of your oil. I bought a case of EOS back before the switch so I'm still using the old stuff that did not have detergent levels this high; I should add that caveat to my posts recommending EOS. Of course, having too high of a detergent level defeats the purpose of the additives. I know in my archives I have a copy of the analysis of the old EOS, so after I wake up, have another two cups of coffee, and walk the dog, I'll see if I can find it and then edit this post to include it. Here's the analysis of the new stuff. Note the calcium level:

|

10-07-2008, 06:06 AM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: ranburne,
al
Cobra Make, Engine: unique,302
Posts: 122
|
|
Not Ranked
had
a bronze gear on ford distributor--older type--bronze gear sheared off in pretty cut pieces--shavings--drove car home from pigeon forge tennessee to ranburne alabama, 302, --pulled oilpan--the double hump kind--presto--there were the bronze gear shavings at bottom of oil pan in perfect round circle.Checked oil pickup screen close, cleaned pan, installed msd dist with iron gear new oil and fired her up.Ran great.Will-alabama
|

10-07-2008, 07:05 AM
|
 |
Half-Ass Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Cobra Make, Engine: ERA #732, 428FE (447 CID), TKO600, Solid Flat Tappet Cam, Tons of Aluminum
Posts: 22,025
|
|
Not Ranked
Here's the old EOS. Note the increase in the detergent package. It has gone from roughly 8000ppm to almost 32,000ppm. A four fold incease; that is significant.
Search terms to help find this thread in the future: GM EOS, E.O.S. old versus new, ZDDP, Zinc content, Extended Oil Service, phosphorous, flat tappet wear
Last edited by patrickt; 10-07-2008 at 07:16 AM..
Reason: added in some additional search terms
|

10-07-2008, 07:56 AM
|
 |
Senior Club Cobra Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Glendale,
AZ.
Cobra Make, Engine: Cobray-C3, The 60's body lines on todays chassis technology
Posts: 2,302
|
|
Not Ranked
Patrickt,
In reading your post you mention the 4 fold detergent package numbers in the NEW formula. Then said "Of course, having too high of a detergent level defeats the purpose of the additives." Are you thinking the amount of detergent in the new EOS negates the benefits or just that it it much higher than the Original?
|

10-07-2008, 08:23 AM
|
 |
Half-Ass Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Cobra Make, Engine: ERA #732, 428FE (447 CID), TKO600, Solid Flat Tappet Cam, Tons of Aluminum
Posts: 22,025
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by vettestr
Patrickt,
... Are you thinking the amount of detergent in the new EOS negates the benefits or just that it is much higher than the Original?
|
I don't know if the increase in Ca now offsets the benefits of the increase in ZDDP. The literature suggests that an increase in calcium detergent (as opposed to Ca/Mg or Ca/Mg/Na detergents) increases wear. Likewise, the literature also suggests that "too high a detergent level" is not good for your engine. I don't know why GM had to change it to begin with, but evidently they did. 
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:59 PM.
Links monetized by VigLink
|