Club Cobra Gas - N Exhaust  

Go Back   Club Cobra > General Discussion > All Racing Talk

MMG Superformance
Nevada Classics
Main Menu
Module Jump:
Nevada Classics
Nevada Classics
MMG Superformance
Advertise at CC
Banner Ad Rates
MMG Superformance
MMG Superformance
Keith Craft Racing
Keith Craft Racing
November 2025
S M T W T F S
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            

Kirkham Motorsports

Like Tree14Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-15-2018, 03:11 PM
xlr8tr's Avatar
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lions Bay, BC
Cobra Make, Engine: CAN-AM cobra, 460 SVO
Posts: 326
Not Ranked     
Default

very interesting Richard! Adding 2" to backspacing would not mess up scrub radius?
__________________
Mark
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-16-2018, 04:26 PM
Richard Hudgins's Avatar
Senior Club Cobra Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Fallbrook, CA USA, CA
Cobra Make, Engine: Porsche 928 S4
Posts: 739
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xlr8tr View Post
very interesting Richard! Adding 2" to backspacing would not mess up scrub radius?
Good catch. If done the way I stated it would indeed alter the scrub radii and wheel rotation would be difficult due to the wheel/upright interference drag induced by the clamping force of the lug nuts.

What I should have stated is that one would add 1" to both the backspacing and the offset on the front (split the increase) and one would add 2" to the backspacing on the rear.

The front with the standard offsets currently has 2.75" positive scrub radius with 11 degree SAI on a tyre dia. of 24.5".

Therefore the increase in backspacing would change the SR to 1.75" which should still give the desired steering feel and centering effect. Note: the design calls for 2 degrees castor or less as the camber gain required is in the geometry and jacking effects are therein minimized as they are extremely detrimental dynamically.

This would necessitate a toe (static) change to offset the reduced torque on the contact patch under braking. Probably would change from .040 to .070 out but once again tyre construction is the biggest factor here.
__________________
Best regards,

Richard Hudgins
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
The representations expressed are the representations and opinions of the clubcobra.com forum members and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and viewpoints of the site owners, moderators, Shelby American, any other replica manufacturer, Ford Motor Company. This website has been planned and developed by clubcobra.com and its forum members and should not be construed as being endorsed by Ford Motor Company, or Shelby American or any other manufacturer unless expressly noted by that entity. "Cobra" and the Cobra logo are registered trademarks for Ford Motor Co., Inc. clubcobra.com forum members agree not to post any copyrighted material unless the copyrighted material is owned by you. Although we do not and cannot review the messages posted and are not responsible for the content of any of these messages, we reserve the right to delete any message for any reason whatsoever. You remain solely responsible for the content of your messages, and you agree to indemnify and hold us harmless with respect to any claim based upon transmission of your message(s). Thank you for visiting clubcobra.com. For full policy documentation refer to the following link: CC Policy
Links monetized by VigLink