classic roadster II sidepipes

[MaSnaka]

I have the dyno numbers with the old pipes circa 1997 and am installing Classic Chambered's 2 1/2" core x 30" mufflers this week. I should have 'em coated and back at the dyno in another week or so, so stand by and I'll have some comparison numbers for you guys. I replaced the Performer 390 with a Performer RPM intake as well. Stay tuned...

John

[undy]

Kev,

...a little confused here. I thought you had already put down 400 rwhp with the old combo?? You never made it to 350 rwhp on either run here. Am I sorta thick and missing sumpin'?


FWIW, I made 470 rwhp with the Pond 482. That's with a smaller cam than I think you're planning on running. As soon as I figure out all the plumbing etc I'm looking at a installing a 300 hp progressive Nitrous fogger system in the car. That should help with it's lethargic behavior..

Dave

[cobraduke]

Dave,
You're going to shoot your eye out with that thing.

Mike

[FUNFER2]

Hey Dave, that 400 was on the Dynojet chassis dyno. It measures and calculates differently. I won't get into it on this thread but, the Mustang dyno will give you real true to the street numbers than the Dynojet. What I've heard is, if you want bragging rights go to them, if you want street and track proven results, go with the mustang.

I think your mind,........is foggy Dave !

[undy]

Originally Posted by FUNFER2

Hey Dave, that 400 was on the Dynojet chassis dyno. It measures and calculates differently. I won't get into it on this thread but, the Mustang dyno will give you real true to the street numbers than the Dynojet. What I've heard is, if you want bragging rights go to them, if you want street and track proven results, go with the mustang.

I think your mind,........is foggy Dave !

Mind's clear as a bell and the dynojet's closer to the real deal, much research done on the latter.

[FUNFER2]

lol,.....I beg to differ, and that can be debated for the next 100 years Dave.