Gore's Inconvenient 9/11 Truth

[Tday]

cute...you mean it depends on what "is" is, *doesn't* it.

But to your confusion on the difference...

One is "sometimes used as a succinct and vivid representation of an illogical statement" (news to me...never heard the wikipedia version) and mine is a just spoof on somethings I always found challenging in class. Stuff that seemed illogical but which was proved and all that. Probably just me, but I found it funny. That's not really that hard to understand.

Tom

[bomelia]

I was looking at the plot of temperature and CO2, (thanks JT) and I was thinking the same thing. What would they look like laid on top of each other? Also, lets look at smaller time scales since these enormous scales make it difficult to resolve time dependancies. It was good to see that one of those scientists did just that. Because then one can see the true relationship...temperature LEADS CO2. This is the fundamental tenent that the religion of global warming is based upon (manmade CO2 is causing the temperature to rise). But CO2 is FOLLOWING temperature rises (always, even in today's era). So, Wes, Tom, what do you read into that??

Mike

[Joe Wicked]

I like this graph. It shows how much the closest station to me has been heating up over the last 100 years. If anyone can look at this and still deny global warming, then there is no help for you.



What I see is the first cycle of a sign wave. oscillating on a 100 year cycle. I am sure it goes back farther and will continue.

[Cobrabill]

oops........