Quote:
Originally Posted by CSX 4039
You're right, he isn't what Republicans are, but he is what they were.
|
Untrue.
The Republican party was formed prior to the Civil War, and Abraham Lincoln was the first Republican president elected.
Ron Paul is a Constitutionalist, not a Republican. He claims libertarian philosophy, NOT Republican philosophy.
Quote:
|
And you're right, most amerikans are so fuqqin socialist, they would have fought for the British in 1776.
|
Untrue.
Generally, the number of left-leaning socialists in the U.S. is smaller than the number of right-leaning anarchists. Most Americans tend to be more moderate, and are proud to be Americans who would fight
for their country rather than against it.
Quote:
|
Ron Paul isn't perfect, but he's a lot better than than the other three, who are all on the same team
|
I'll agree with you - and even go further and say that Ron Paul is as
far from perfect as a political candidate (even a democrat) can be. ESPECIALLY when he goes 'off the script' and starts talking (or rather 'babbling incoherently') about his screwy philosophies.
Using Alex Jones the conspiracy goofball in conjunction with an endorsement of Ron "D'oh!" Paul seems oddly fitting. Maybe there's a comet out there with both their names on it ...
Quote:
|
Honestly, I would have thought that CC, where people drive cars without airbags, that fly in the face of government regulations, would have been a bastion of libertarianism
|
Why? There's a significant difference between the nutty screwballery of fringe groups like libertarians and groups of automobile enthusiasts. Driving a car without airbags doesn't make one a ralph nader endorsing, ron paul loving, goose stepping thug. Thankfully.
Quote:
|
But, you're right. Only 16 delegates get it.
|
16 out of 1,349, or, roughly 1.1%.
That's an interesting statistic, and I'll tell you why: 1.1% of Americans suffer from some type of serious and debilitating mental illness. Coincidence? I think not...
Your pal,
Meat.