Quote:
Originally Posted by J. T. Toad
you address me directly,
|
Nope. I address everyone on the internet when I post on an open forum. If I was addressing you directly, I would have sent you a private message.
Quote:
Originally Posted by J. T. Toad
and sign salutations as 'your pal'?
|
Nope. I close my posts with 'Your pal." Basic identification of the anatomy of a post or letter clearly identifies the opening to a post or letter as the salutation. Not the closing. Duh.
Quote:
Originally Posted by J. T. Toad
It seems that your impression of my comprehension skills is not the only one lacking in logic or interpretation.
|
Nope. They're spot-on, and reinforced by the post I'm responding to.
Quote:
Originally Posted by J. T. Toad
Might you be happier if I were to have responded with a 'won't be'?
|
Nope. My happiness isn't contingent on others, their responses, or their abysmal writing skills.
Quote:
Originally Posted by J. T. Toad
Sheepish quoting out of context makes this dialog loose all substantive value.
|
Sheepish? Nope.
Out of context? Nope.
Loose? Nope.
Not sure where you were wandering off to with that there sentence, but you might want to think about
not using a thesaurus to insert words you don't understand into poorly structured sentences in an attempt to look intelligent. It seems to backfire on you really badly.
Quote:
Originally Posted by J. T. Toad
My challenge to makes this country a better place
|
Nope. You made no such challenge; you only badmouthed the country.
Quote:
Originally Posted by J. T. Toad
semantic battle.
|
Nope. No battle - semantic or otherwise. You insulted the country, I called you on it, and you chose to attack me. And you did a p!ss-poor job of
that, too; it only made you look even more foolish.
Your pal,
Meat.
Hybrid Mode
