The Obama Economy

[cobra de capell]

Originally Posted by cobra bill

CDC, Great articles, while I disagree that Obama has been as bad as you and others claim, I do agree this needs to come to the light of day, and so far that is what I am most proud about when it comes to Obama, he has been vary transparent in everything he has done thus far, OK more needs to be done, and those that brought us to this point need to be prosecuted, and I personally don't care who goes down for it, whether it be Barny Frank or Phil Graham, they need to be made examples of.

he has been vary transparent in everything he has done thus far,

Cobra Bull - now, this is a good example of the problems with practically all your posts, aside from spelling errors - those that know, know that he hasn't been transparent at all, for example -

The federal government must be more transparent
http://www.stillwatergazette.com/art...opinion220.txt

1,073 Pages (A stimulus bill that's anything but transparent)
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123456958734386181.html

In part....

In his closing remarks on the stimulus bill yesterday, House Appropriations Chairman David Obey called it "the largest change in domestic policy since the 1930s." We'd say more like the 1960s, which is bad enough, but his point about the bill's magnitude is right. The 1,073-page monstrosity includes the biggest spending increase since World War II, but more important is the fine print expanding the role of the federal government across the breadth of American business, health care, energy and welfare policy.

Given those stakes, you might think Congress would get more than a few hours to debate it. But, no, yesterday's roll call votes came less than 24 hours after House-Senate conferees had agreed to their deal. Democrats rushed the bill to the floor before Members could even read it, much less have time to broadcast the details so the public could offer its verdict.

So much for Democratic promises of a new era of transparency. Only this Tuesday the House unanimously approved a resolution promising 48-hour public notice before holding a roll call. Even better, the bill could have been posted on the Internet, as candidate Barack Obama suggested during the campaign. Let voters see what they're getting for all this money. Not a chance.
____

Therefore, when you use words like "very transparent" to defend your boy - it's simply not believable, it's more or less lying to further your agenda. By the way, no one posting here believes anything that you post relating to politics and it's not because you are a flaming liberal, it's due to standard sick, delusional liberal tactics - they cannot see or face reality when it stares them in the face.

And your comment above "and we need everyone on board to help, they all need to put aside their ideological differences stop calling each other names and get something done! at least putting people back to work is a start" is basically BS.

Is it inherently unpatriotic or immoral to want to see a president fail?

“The President is merely the most important among a large number of public servants. He should be supported or opposed exactly to the degree which is warranted by his good conduct or bad conduct, his efficiency or inefficiency in rendering loyal, able, and disinterested service to the Nation as a whole. Therefore it is absolutely necessary that there should be full liberty to tell the truth about his acts, and this means that it is exactly necessary to blame him when he does wrong as to praise him when he does right. Any other attitude in an American citizen is both base and servile. To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public. Nothing but the truth should be spoken about him or any one else. But it is even more important to tell the truth, pleasant or unpleasant, about him than about any one else.”

“Theodore Roosevelt in the Kansas City Star” - May 7, 1918

President Obama carries an intellectual confidence so severely out of step with his skill set that the promise of disappointment, I trust, one day will bring me great joy. When I'm not posting here, I plead with some higher power to sentence Obama to painful obscurity and professional failure, practically every single day.

Therefore, standing by Obama as you seem to be, with no criticism to offer is practically teasonable, given the fact that you are a reasonably intellegent man and assuming that you are also completely sane.