Gov’t Built Solar House Falls Apart

[VRM]

Wes,
They built them at their own universities, transported them, and the reassembled them. This particular one had almost $400K in transportation and related costs (people have been lumping that all in together with the actual cost of the house).

The scoring was actually really complicated - they took measurements and assigned point values for staying within certain temperature ranges at various points during the day. They also had to cook meals for 3 different judging teams, showers were used and water pressure and temp had to be maintained, along with a bunch of other things. I suspect that some of our houses would not pass the tests that these solar ones had to go through.

Steve

[Ron61]

Steve,

A question, not an argument. What states would those solar powered houses really work well in year round? A few years ago P.G.& E. tried to get everyone here to go to solar power with some help from them and abandoned it after about 6 months as our weather just isn't practical for solar power, except in the Summer. About 5 to 6 months a year, there would be no power, during a normal year which we haven't had for several years. Some of the solar panels were damaged by hail, and the batteries couldn't store enough to last two days of rain or darkness. I am sure the batteries have been improved by now but even so, it would take a huge amount of capacity to run a small house completely for even a day, and the batteries do have to be replaced just as the ones in the ESS machines do. I believe they finally figured that for a 900 square foot house to just break even up here it would take around 90 years. Not exactly sure of those figures as it was a few years ago but I was following it with interest as I wanted to see if it would be practical to even go to partial solar.

Ron

[VRM]

Ron,
I look into getting solar every 2-3 years or so. I am at the point where I could run about 2/3 of my average use from solar panels, and they would pay for themselves in about 10 years. (though my electric rates have increased and I have not recalculated for that). My state has pretty high electricity rates, and they also have a lot of incentives to add alternate energy sources. My house is also facing the perfect direction for maximum panel sun time. The panels have also significantly increased their efficiency/cost ratio since I first started looking.

It really depends on what kind of setup you want to get. You don't have to get batteries, but then you need a backup source for nights and rainy days. You also know what ESS battery packs are like - I cannot imagine too many homeowners wanting even a small pack in their house. I can sell the excess back to the electric company if I do not want to go the battery route. Having a fully standalone system (one that can run when the electric company has problems or downed lines) is a lot more complicated and expensive than just having solar as an additional source.

I don't know where the 'perfect' location would be. I think that depends on electricity rates, tax credits, weather, and a lot of other factors. Maybe Southern CA?

It is not a perfect technology, and certainly not going to save the planet or get us off of foreign oil, but it is still worth developing and using when and where it makes sense to.

Steve

[DAVID GAGNARD]

The local Indian tribe here has just built thier first house with solar panels. The design from the get-go was not to run completely on solar energy, but the solar panels would work in conjunction with the outside electrical source....

The electrical systems in the house are designed to run on the standard electrical supply and whenever possible it will automatically switch to the solar panels when they can supply the electricity for the currnet demand....I can see this working with a standard electrical supply to help lower energy use/cost, the question is,is it feasable right now???? I'm sure with technology always changing, there will be a time when solar panels will be able to assist standard electrical supplies at a reasonble cost making it a worthwhile deal.

They estimate it will reduce the normal energy cost by about 25%... No figures were given on the cost of the solar panels and related electrical components as most of this was done thru a goverment grant type deal.....

It's kinda a "test home" right now....but it does show promise....

David

[Ron61]

Steve & David,

At the rate our electric and all utilities are going up anything would help, but at this time I don't think solar panels are a viable option for here. I live just in the foothills of the mountains and we have thunderstorms, hail, snow, and rain during about 4 to 6 months of a normal year. The past 3 years have not been normal at all. I looked at a couple of new big office buildings they built in Redding about 4 years ago and they have solar panels on the roof that are supposed to just help run them. Then when I talked to a couple of the people who worked in the buildings they told me they were having a lot of problems with the panels breaking and not producing enough electricity to ever pay for what they cost. I am sure that in the past 4 years they have improved on the panels, but I don't have a roof as big as the two solar panels they used on those buildings. I would like to find something that would help with my electric bill, but even the two solar companies that I have talked to here told me that it was not economically practical for me to have them installed even just to help some.

Ron

[VRM]

Ron,
I think some places are just not meant for solar power (though some of the Al Gore crowd think solar panels are great everywhere). Sounds like a wind turbine would be perfect, though. I have no idea what kind of juice they generate, or what the cost is, so it may be not be that great an idea.

Steve

[Wes Tausend]

Originally Posted by VRM

Wes,
They built them at their own universities, transported them, and... ...I suspect that some of our houses would not pass the tests that these solar ones had to go through.

Steve

Steve,
I have to agree that the testing was inordinately intricate although I was likely half asleep when I watched it. I think in cases like this, the projects are "built to failure". We could all agree more is learned if all of us understand the engineering concept.

The program was somewhat humorous and heartbreaking in the Murphy's Law dept. Like I say, it reminds me of some of the Cobra-build snafu's. I took Fred's humorous comments to reflect this while he teased you. In effect we are all window-lickers.

Originally Posted by Ron61

...Some of the solar panels were damaged by hail, and the batteries couldn't store enough to last two days of rain or darkness...

Ron,

I suspect hail damage could be mitigated by the old Alaska Highway technique (now paved). The old graveled AH had so many thrown rocks, it was recommended that the windshield and headlights be shielded by a metal screen to save breaking. Perhaps 3/8 inch mesh. There is some associated "shade" loss.

The Chinese will probably soon invent a superior solar panel since they are short on resources. Unless they conquer Russia with it's vast reserves, God forbid. First gunpowder then solar, those rascals. I think solar is, at best about 20% efficient now. Some think we will see 80% in the near future.

One of the reasons I haven't had as much time to post here was we bought a camper last year. So I did do some internet research into RV ownership questions I had. In that course, I ran into essays on solar and wind power for primitive camping (I'm a info-junky sucker for getting sidetracked). Solar is also partly popular for camping when it is in a populated site because it is much quieter than noisy gas or even wind generators. Solar already works extremely well when minimal power is needed by conserving it, using LED lighting etc. Refrigeration can be adequately done with solid state (also known as thermoelectric). A.C.? Forget it. Maybe next year.

Wes

...

[Ron61]

Right here in this area, wind power would be iffy at best. We don't have much wind normally as the mountains block most of it. I am talking to a friend of mine who a few years ago sold his world wide electronics company and started a solar company. He lives in the Bay Area and has been up here a lot of times and he said with what they have to offer now he thinks I would save money by paying the higher rates as it takes so many panels to generate enough electricity to be practical for most homes in an area like this.
I have visited the wind farms down toward Livermore and talked to the techs there and they told me there was a lot of upkeep on those turbines. Of course they are huge and they have steady wind in that area almost all the time.

Ron