Tough Town Hall with Barney Frank

[Excaliber]

An elderly lady voiced her opinion,

Several things wrong with that, I saw her picture, she didn't appear to be elderly or infirm in any way.

Her "opinion"? I think not, little more than copy/paste of what's been flying around the internet, print and various media groups for awhile.

Her QUESTION was, why did the speaker support the NAZI like programs of the administration? What kind of question is that exactly? How do you ever respond to such a pitiful query? To even attempt to answer the question lends credence to the idea that the administration policy's echo those of the Nazi's. A comparison I really get tired of. It shows a complete and fundamental ignorance of the Nazi regime. It's a disgusting comparison at the very best.

Her "question" doesn't even deserve to be acknowledged as she framed it, regardless of who the speaker at the meeting was.

[Dan40]

Originally Posted by Excaliber

Several things wrong with that, I saw her picture, she didn't appear to be elderly or infirm in any way.

Her "opinion"? I think not, little more than copy/paste of what's been flying around the internet, print and various media groups for awhile.

Her QUESTION was, why did the speaker support the NAZI like programs of the administration? What kind of question is that exactly? How do you ever respond to such a pitiful query? To even attempt to answer the question lends credence to the idea that the administration policy's echo those of the Nazi's. A comparison I really get tired of. It shows a complete and fundamental ignorance of the Nazi regime. It's a disgusting comparison at the very best.

Her "question" doesn't even deserve to be acknowledged as she framed it, regardless of who the speaker at the meeting was.

Is that the "Two wrongs make a right rule?"

[Anthony]

Originally Posted by Excaliber

Her QUESTION was, why did the speaker support the NAZI like programs of the administration? What kind of question is that exactly? How do you ever respond to such a pitiful query? To even attempt to answer the question lends credence to the idea that the administration policy's echo those of the Nazi's. A comparison I really get tired of. It shows a complete and fundamental ignorance of the Nazi regime. It's a disgusting comparison at the very best.

Her "question" doesn't even deserve to be acknowledged as she framed it, regardless of who the speaker at the meeting was.

I don't know about you, but I think I remember something about the Nazi regime asking the general public to act as informants, to notify the government about other people who voiced opinions or other propoganda controversial to the views of the current Nazi regime. At which time later, these people were rounded up for a once in a lifetime vacation.

Maybe similar in some ways to the recent white houses request for info on people spreading "false health care info", like Obama only spreads the truth?

[427sharpe]

Originally Posted by Excaliber

Several things wrong with that, I saw her picture, she didn't appear to be elderly or infirm in any way.

And yet, we were raised to be respectful, yes? Even when someone else steps out of line; or does that not apply via political affiliation?

Her "opinion"? I think not, little more than copy/paste of what's been flying around the internet, print and various media groups for awhile.

You miss the point. Again..her opinion..and she is entitled, no matter how off center we think it is.

Her QUESTION was, why did the speaker support the NAZI like programs of the administration? What kind of question is that exactly? How do you ever respond to such a pitiful query? To even attempt to answer the question lends credence to the idea that the administration policy's echo those of the Nazi's. A comparison I really get tired of. It shows a complete and fundamental ignorance of the Nazi regime. It's a disgusting comparison at the very best.

Very simply: I would say something along the lines of most politicians in similar circumstances: "Ma'am, I find your content & reference misguided and beneath a response. Move on."

Her "question" doesn't even deserve to be acknowledged as she framed it, regardless of who the speaker at the meeting was.

I suppose the BHO cult is feeling the pressure and can be forgiven their rather illuminating prickliness. I suppose free speech to them only applies to speech they approve of.
Rather odd that the liberal defenders did so little while GB was being ravaged daily.