SUPPORT OUR SPONSOR

Go Back   Club Cobra > Club Cobra Tech Areas > Shop Talk

Welcome to Club Cobra!  The World's largest non biased Shelby Cobra related site!

  •  » Representation from nearly all Cobra/Daytona/GT40 manufacturers
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and nearly 1 million posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

Nevada Classics
Main Menu
Nevada Classics
Nevada Classics
Keith Craft Racing
MMG Superformance
Advertise at CC
Banner Ad Rates
MMG Superformance
Keith Craft Racing
MMG Superformance
MMG Superformance
November 2025
S M T W T F S
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            

Kirkham Motorsports

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-21-2002, 11:38 PM
Andy Dunn's Avatar
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: upland, ca,
Posts: 355
Send a message via ICQ to Andy Dunn
Not Ranked     
Default

I'd agree that the vic jr intake is probably not the best match for the stock heads on the ford crate. Certainly peak HP is only one piece of information to compare two engine, but it is a starting point. Here are some additional thoughts

1. Manifolds and RPM
I don't know who started this, but I see this relationship as more of an edelbrock marketing move. Heads are not sold for a specific RPM range and I think it is a little confusing when edelbrock sells manifolds this way. It perhaps an easy system for the public to grasp when really, manifolds "flow". They flow just like heads. I personally think a better approach to engine component selection is to match head flow data to manifold flow data. Too big of manifold on small heads and the engine is flat. Too small of manifold on big heads and you are making the engine breath through a swizzle stick.

2. Manifolds and Flow Data
Its hard to come by but can be found. Here are some sample numbers on edelbrock and Parker intakes....converting all to cfm 28 H2O and averaging the middle and end runners

Performer 200
Torquer 220
Vic Jr 260
Super Vic 320
Parker Funnel Web 305

the Performer RPM was not listed, I am going to take a wild guess and peg it at 210...right between Performer and Torquer

Data was collected from
http://www.jason.fletcher.net/tech/intakes/intakes.htm
http://www.fomoco.com.au/Funnelweb.htm
http://www.rfedd.bigstep.com/generic147.html

and so...if I were putting AFR 205s on an engine, and these peak flow 300 as low as .550 lift, well I sure as shootin would not want the Performer RPM intake since I am starving the heads for air. Likewise, if I was building an engine with AFR165 heads and a medium cam and these heads flow 248 at .550 lift, I would not pick a super vic or parker funnel web intake since that engine is going to be a dog at anything less than wide open throttle.

3. Dual Vs Single intake on a 393 w/ AFR 205s
Here is the chart with a Comp 276HR
http://www.cobralads.com/dyno2000/dual_single1.gif

Here is the area under the curve with the differences highlighted.
http://www.cobralads.com/dyno2000/dual_single5.gif

Green is where the single beats the dual and Yellow is dual beating the single. The single has more total area under the curve. The dual wins the 2000 - 3750 range and the single wins the 3750 - 6500 range. At this point I believe the intake choice is subjective to what a driver is personally looking for. Racing...I would want the green. Bragging rights...I would want the green. Daily driver...I'd probably choose the yellow.


Andy
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
The representations expressed are the representations and opinions of the clubcobra.com forum members and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and viewpoints of the site owners, moderators, Shelby American, any other replica manufacturer, Ford Motor Company. This website has been planned and developed by clubcobra.com and its forum members and should not be construed as being endorsed by Ford Motor Company, or Shelby American or any other manufacturer unless expressly noted by that entity. "Cobra" and the Cobra logo are registered trademarks for Ford Motor Co., Inc. clubcobra.com forum members agree not to post any copyrighted material unless the copyrighted material is owned by you. Although we do not and cannot review the messages posted and are not responsible for the content of any of these messages, we reserve the right to delete any message for any reason whatsoever. You remain solely responsible for the content of your messages, and you agree to indemnify and hold us harmless with respect to any claim based upon transmission of your message(s). Thank you for visiting clubcobra.com. For full policy documentation refer to the following link: CC Policy