 
Main Menu
|
Nevada Classics
|
Advertise at CC
|
| S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
| 2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
| 9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
| 16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
| 23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
| 30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CC Advertisers
|
|
10Likes

05-04-2014, 09:52 AM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,092
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerry Clayton
There is no such thing as VARIBLE MASS----a fiqure skater does not change mass as they pull in there arms/leg----------
|
yeah, that's my point - skater's mass remains unchanged but the rotational mass changes dramatically, read it again.
patrickt's comment illustrates exactly what we're talking about ...
I had my FE specifically built to be, in my uneducated words, "a quick revver." The builder went with a slightly shorter stroke, and all light weight stuff ...
patrickt's engine builder reduced the rotating mass of his engine by incorporating those mods.
|

05-04-2014, 09:58 AM
|
 |
Half-Ass Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Cobra Make, Engine: ERA #732, 428FE (447 CID), TKO600, Solid Flat Tappet Cam, Tons of Aluminum
Posts: 22,025
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by AL427SBF
...The builder went with a slightly shorter stroke,
|
We had the "does a shorter stroke make a revvier engine" debate a few years ago. We had four very smart, very experienced FE builders chime in. Two said it absolutely did, two said it absolutely didn't. 
|

05-04-2014, 09:59 AM
|
 |
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Northern VA,
VA
Cobra Make, Engine: Classic Roadsters
Posts: 2,765
|
|
Not Ranked
UHhhhhh
A fatter figure skater will rev faster than a thinner figure skater unless they are wearing a blue outfit with ruffles or if there is a full moon out.
.
__________________
LIFE IS TOO SHORT TO WORRY ABOUT GOOD GAS MILEAGE
________
Utinam logica falsa tuam philosophiam totam suffodiant!
________
|

05-04-2014, 10:08 AM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,092
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by CobraEd
A fatter figure skater will rev faster than a thinner figure skater unless they are wearing a blue outfit with ruffles or if there is a full moon out.
.
|
lol, one last crack at it and then let them believe what they want to.
Less rotating mass = less inertia to move it (in this case spin it up or slow it down). Your engine's rotating mass is a parasitic drag on the motor, stored energy does nothing for you in terms of car acceleration*, the less rotating mass the less parasitic drain on the motor.
*unless you can rev it up and dump the clutch like in a 1/4 mile launch.
|

05-04-2014, 10:39 AM
|
 |
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Northern VA,
VA
Cobra Make, Engine: Classic Roadsters
Posts: 2,765
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by AL427SBF
lol, one last crack at it and then let them believe what they want to.
Less rotating mass = less inertia to move it (in this case spin it up or slow it down). Your engine's rotating mass is a parasitic drag on the motor, stored energy does nothing for you in terms of car acceleration*, the less rotating mass the less parasitic drain on the motor.
*unless you can rev it up and dump the clutch like in a 1/4 mile launch.
|
Very eloquently stated, however your talking points are loaded with logic and empirically proven concepts. Unfortunately, given what we have read earlier, none of that applies here.
If I could add one additional new point just to add some flavor to this discussion, not only does the heavier big block crank add more parasitic rotational drag on the motor, but the heavier big block rods and pistons add more parasitic drag on the motor due to greater reciprocating mass. Let the games begin !!!!
.
.
__________________
LIFE IS TOO SHORT TO WORRY ABOUT GOOD GAS MILEAGE
________
Utinam logica falsa tuam philosophiam totam suffodiant!
________
|

05-04-2014, 11:14 AM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Louisville,
KY
Cobra Make, Engine: I'm Cobra-less!
Posts: 9,417
|
|
Not Ranked
Heavier than what? Lighter than what?
What examples are you all pulling from? Is there a small block that you have in mind when you're discussing this, or is there a big block that you have in mind?
What parts are they using?
Do you not understand that in a lot of cases, the reciprocating mass of a big block is not heavier than the reciprocating mass of a small block?
Do you not understand that your "parasitic rotational drag" is a bogus point considering that the main journal diameter of an FE is the same diameter as the main journal in a Dart Windsor block?
Instead of speaking from emotional viewpoints, how about you guys ante up with some examples. Quoting from the Olympics and your physics book does nothing to justify your point.
The word "generalization" fits this thread very well.
Generalization: a statement about a group of people or things that is based on only a few people or things in that group.
On the 2nd page of this thread, Madmaxx said that, "as far as FE and stroked small block, the small block will rev much quicker...."
That in itself is a blanket statement, and unless you qualify each and every variable in both engines, it's incorrect.
If Jerry is going to post some balance sheets of both some big blocks and small blocks, you will find that yes, there are some small block rotating assemblies that are lighter, and yes, there are some big block rotating assemblies that are lighter.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:19 AM.
Links monetized by VigLink
|