Hurst Comp Plus of Ford Shifter for Toploader

[Learjockey1]

Time for a new shifter. ERA car with 427/Toploader/Ford shifter with reverse lockout disconnected, but a little sloppy. I have read the shifter threads but they do not quite answer my question. Here goes.

I have talked to two very reputable and knowledgeable vendors on this site and one likes the Ford and the other likes the Hurst Comp Plus. I like the Hurst because of the limiting bolts that act as a stop to hard shifts. I understand the limiting feature saves the Toploader rails. However, I also believe Ford engineers know a thing or two about designing sturdy parts as well. Not all in the aftermarket is an improvement. I wonder if the Ford shifter may have a more silkier feel other attributes that make it better and possible more harmonious to the human senses in this type of automobile. Some things are not quantifiable. If my Ford shifter was less sloppy, I would be happy. The bushings and gate are little worn, but I just want to make things new.

I need a shifter that will “bolt in” using the existing shifter lever bolts without having to, weld, machine, lower, raise, shim, cut, change shifter hole location etc. I can do all of the before mentioned work, but I only get one day a week to work on the car. I also do not have the time to send it off and have it reworked, unless that course of action is really required. I understand the Hurst will accept the Ford shifter lever and will not require any changes, but desire a cross check with other owners. The existing placement works very well in the ERA. Cost is not a factor. I need a shifter that will bolt in, work the first time, and be a pleasure to use in spirited driving. I am not rough on the car or drag racing. Asking for your advice, experiences, recommendations, and preferences.

Thanks