289 FIA vintage race engine with Webers

[1795]

I don't know what is wrong with you Craig and Brent, I am turing 60 next month and everything is still working fine

It will be an interesting year. Wish I had some time to track the car before Mid Ohio, but that doesn't look possible. At least I am doing the test day there.

Jim

[1795]

Ok,

Having some new buyer remorse, I called Darryl and Jim to touch base on the concerns mentioned here. Jim Inglese did the setup on the carbs and he is happy with where things are set and how they are operating. I am not going to argue with Jim, he has extensive experience with Webers and if he says that everything is fine, then until I see otherwise, that is good enough for me.

The cam was a special grind for this engine based upon the displacement, compression ratio, Webers, heads, desired power band and intended use. It is not similar to the grinds that they get for stroked small block engines.

The crank was sent out to a person who specializes in crankshafts and it had everything that you could imagine doing to a crank to ensure that it was properly treated, examined and balanced. I think that any seeming imbalance in the dyno video could be attributed to the fact that my phone was resting on the window sill and leaning on the plexiglass. Vibrations from the pull probably distorted the video a little.

I'll let you all know when I get the engine installed and running.

Jim

[Gaz64]

Jim,

I think we'll find the belt deflection on the engine stand is some harmonics happening that video can't capture as "true to life" due to frames per second.

A bit like vehicle wheels that go backwards on TV.

Now, your carbs.

I hope some other guys on here will chime in to say what choke size they have.

If Jim gave you 42mm, then your combo of CID, compression ratio, cam profile etc, AND intended use: driving style, peak rpm etc were all deciding factors.

A tuning book of mine shows the ideal intake tract for an IR system, to have the throttle butterfly as the same size as that of the intake valve, and then the choke to be .85 of the butterfly.

Yours would be around these figures.

I would thinking about an air corrector change that will richen the top end, something like 180 as a start. Easy enough to drill them out to 1.85 about No. 73 as a test.
Then buy the correct sizes when you are happy with your testing. A misfire (poor combustion, valve float, poor spark quality etc) leaves unused oxygen, which then shows lean.
You may see that happen as the power falls away.

Gary

[blykins]

I’m still thinking something is off with the crank pulley. Even on the video from the dyno where there is no belt, I see run-out at low rpm. It’s almost like the pulley is bent or it’s not centered on the balancer.

I’m also concerned with the valve float signs on the dyno sheet. Could be the reason the engine is not making the horsepower it should.

[Gaz64]

Originally Posted by blykins

I’m still thinking something is off with the crank pulley. Even on the video from the dyno where there is no belt, I see run-out at low rpm. It’s almost like the pulley is bent or it’s not centered on the balancer.

I’m also concerned with the valve float signs on the dyno sheet. Could be the reason the engine is not making the horsepower it should.

Ah yes, after looking at dyno videos.

More investigation as to the cause of the power falling off, either valve float or ignition system etc.

[blykins]

Originally Posted by Gaz64

Ah yes, after looking at dyno videos.

More investigation as to the cause of the power falling off, either valve float or ignition system etc.

I would say valve float.

If it were just an issue with not enough camshaft, then the power would just fall off in a curve.

In the last 500 rpm of the dyno sheet, we see the power go up, back down, up, back down, etc. That's a tell-tale sign of valve float. I would say that the engine needs a little more valve spring seat pressure.

[Gaz64]

He's making near 1.5 per cube now, but there's probably another 30hp still on the table.

Gary