Club Cobra Gas-N Exhaust  

Go Back   Club Cobra > Engine Building, Tuning, and Induction > 429/460 Engine Talk

Nevada Classics
MMG Superformance
Main Menu
Module Jump:
Nevada Classics
Nevada Classics
MMG Superformance
MMG Superformance
Advertise at CC
Banner Ad Rates
MMG Superformance
MMG Superformance
Keith Craft Racing
MMG Superformance
November 2025
S M T W T F S
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            

Kirkham Motorsports

Like Tree41Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2015, 08:02 PM
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 556
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by joyridin' View Post
Thank you for the great explanation. Here is the question I think most of us reading this thread would like to know. Knowing the issues with these engines, why would you build an engine for a customer...not located in the USA on top of it...if you know there are issues? Do you warn them in writing before taking their money they have no warranty, or do you just build it, hope there isn't a problem, then if one appears, try to blame somebody/something else?
That probably doesn't deserve a response, Barry didn't build the engine so why make it his problem or imply he operates the way your mind has conjured up how KC operates?

Does anyone actually believe damage, a guy who digs into every detail, dropped $60K on a motor build and didn't discuss with Keith what parts would be used? Not a chance period.

Barry, thanks for sharing your knowledge and educating some of us including David Kirkham on the finer nuances of cammer builds and problems. There's no substitute for hands-on experience. It always amazes me how bogus facts are presented with such conviction as to not question the veracity of those facts.
Joe
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2015, 11:09 PM
damage's Avatar
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: redcliffe, qld
Cobra Make, Engine: Kirkham 427SC 482 Cammer
Posts: 700
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe's Garage View Post
That probably doesn't deserve a response, Barry didn't build the engine so why make it his problem or imply he operates the way your mind has conjured up how KC operates?

Does anyone actually believe damage, a guy who digs into every detail, dropped $60K on a motor build and didn't discuss with Keith what parts would be used? Not a chance period.

Barry, thanks for sharing your knowledge and educating some of us including David Kirkham on the finer nuances of cammer builds and problems. There's no substitute for hands-on experience. It always amazes me how bogus facts are presented with such conviction as to not question the veracity of those facts.
Joe

Not sure what you are stating as being bogus.

I asked some questions and they are yet to be answered.

As far as your comment about the engine is concerned your assumption is incorrect, I didn't ask about the engine other then how much.

Should I really need to ask if the engine builder who is being backed by some people on here as one of Americas best if he uses substandard parts?
FatBoy and joyridin' like this.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-28-2015, 05:23 AM
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: West Bloomfield, MI
Cobra Make, Engine:
Posts: 717
Not Ranked     
Default

I can comment on some things. Since I was not there, and was not involved in any way I am only equal to the rest of us - I am a spectator with no skin in the game.

The valve contact - I can see why you would get the impression that the valves rotate from viewing those parts. Its more a matter of the where/when/how they contacted the piston though. Once a valve gets hit the first time it is no longer flat and every subsequent contact can move it, spin it, fold it and mutilate it. There is simply no functional design element that causes a valve to rotate in operation beyond the nominal "scrub" from the spring.

As to the Coon heads I can only repeat my personal experience. My experience with the heads has been acceptable, my experience with the man behind them is challenging. I know that Jay has had a significant personality and legal conflict with Coon and that may color the tone of his discussions.

As for the component selection - I can only restate that we do not have enough repetitive experience to say "those parts always work, but those always break" on Cammer motors. We all use a small selection of parts from a very limited line of suppliers and while we are developing, the pace is slow in comparison to high volume builds.

The business situation and relationship between the various parties and how they handle it is none of my damned business.
__________________
Survival Motorsports

"I can do that....."



Engine Masters Challenge Entries
91 octane - single 4bbl - mufflers
2008 - 429 cid FE HR - 675HP
2007 - 429 cid FE MR - 659HP
2006 - 434 cid FE MR - 678HP
2005 - 505 cid FE MR - 752HP
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-28-2015, 06:44 AM
joyridin''s Avatar
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,696
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe's Garage View Post
That probably doesn't deserve a response, Barry didn't build the engine so why make it his problem or imply he operates the way your mind has conjured up how KC operates?

Does anyone actually believe damage, a guy who digs into every detail, dropped $60K on a motor build and didn't discuss with Keith what parts would be used? Not a chance period.

Barry, thanks for sharing your knowledge and educating some of us including David Kirkham on the finer nuances of cammer builds and problems. There's no substitute for hands-on experience. It always amazes me how bogus facts are presented with such conviction as to not question the veracity of those facts.
Joe
I wasn't asking him to comment on how KC operates. I was asking for his opinion on how he handles building one of these engines. He just gave us a detailed briefing describing the issues. I am curious as to how they handle a sale. It is reasonably obvious by now at least on the engine being discussed how KC handles it. If engines are being sold "without warranty", then paying $60k for a 40 mile trip was an expensive endeavor. I would hope that "let the buyer beware" isn't the standard practice.

And BTW..I do not need to "conjure" up anything. The proof is in the pudding. If you choose to ignore the obvious, then you seem to be the one with issues.

Last edited by joyridin'; 02-28-2015 at 06:50 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-28-2015, 10:00 AM
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Carlsbad, Ca
Cobra Make, Engine: SPF 2932 with 438 Lykins Motorsports engine. Previous owner of FFR 5452.
Posts: 2,616
Not Ranked     
Default

Maybe I missed something here but I can understand why KC is getting a little bent.

If this happened to me, I would be mad as hell too. However, after communicating with the builder, I would simply pull the engine and ship it back to KC and let him honor his warranty (as he has stated he would do). Obviously Damage has the financial resources to do just that.

If I bought a Ford crate engine and it imploded during the warranty period, they would probably ask me to crate it up and send it back to them for analysis and repair.

If you send it back to KC and he fixes it, you will get a new engine with a new warranty on it. If he just sends you the parts and you or someone else rebuilds it and then it grenades again, who's going to honor the warranty. It won't be KC.

I feel for both parties. No winner here. Is there a reason Damage doesn't want to send the engine back? Did I miss something? Won't be the first time.
__________________
Jim
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2015, 07:12 PM
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Cobra Make, Engine: Superformance, Survival Motorsports aluminum FE 482
Posts: 662
Not Ranked     
Default

Here is a rare example of an internet expert who is actually an expert. The whole thing has gone full circle!
__________________
Bill
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2015, 07:39 PM
Grubby's Avatar
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Clayton, IN
Cobra Make, Engine: ERA 838
Posts: 1,133
Not Ranked     
Default

Very nice - Kirkham and Survival Motorsports have both taken the opportunity to really shine. Both offering solutions to a problem they have nothing to do with. They are both class acts.

I would do business with either without hesitation.

John
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2015, 08:13 PM
RodKnock's Avatar
Senior Club Cobra Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Cobra Make, Engine: KMP 539, a Ton of Aluminum
Posts: 9,592
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Detroit Bill View Post
Here is a rare example of an internet expert who is actually an expert. The whole thing has gone full circle!
A consumer who purchases a car, an engine, a dress, a computer, a McDonald's iced tea, or whatever, doesn't need to an expert in anything. However, the consumer who purchases a $60K engine, probably wants his engine to last more than 40 miles. I never doubted the veracity of Damage's claims. So, maybe I'm an "internet expert" in reading people.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2015, 07:35 PM
damage's Avatar
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: redcliffe, qld
Cobra Make, Engine: Kirkham 427SC 482 Cammer
Posts: 700
Not Ranked     
Default

David Kirkham, thank you for your kind words and your more then generous offer. This just keeps reinforcing with me that there is absolutely no doubt that you are the one and only Cobra guy to deal with.

Detroit Bill thank you for your apology I sincerly appreciate that.

Barry R, while I understand your comments that the valve does not rotate there still remains questions on my motor and what I believe is a valve that has both rotated during its operation and also at the same time been subjected to continuing valve to piston interference.

This is a photo that I have zoomed into and cropped of one of the 4 exhaust valves on the right hand bank of the engine.



And this is the corresponding piston notch.



It is pretty obvious that a continual rotation of the valve has occured whilst also contacting the piston. If you zoom right in on the valve photo you can also see the exact contact points which were the final contact when the chain broke.

I can't in my mind come up with any logical explaination as to why the valves are witnessed a full 360 degrees if 1. The valves do not rotate during operation. And 2. They are witnessed a full 360 degrees which would mean full time contact during operation.

I'm happy to be corrected on my thinking if a logical explaination can be given, but several well known engine builders and drag racers that I am friends with here in Australia have looked at these things with me and all are of the same opinion.

As far as these heads are concerned the leaks are directly as a result of machining out into water jackets and then welding them to repair and hand smoothing the port when finished. As my engineer said in his email the wall thickness is less about 40 thou. This ain't enough meat to ensure they don't crack like they have.


I know these can be repaired my guys have fixed way worse then this before BUT there is an equation of cost v's effort that I have considered and the potential for that effort and cost to be frivolous if the repair doesn't last.

The simple fact of the matter is if I wanted this sort of hassle I would have bought 2nd hand equipment and rolled the dice.

I didn't I bought new equipment from someone that is supposed to be well regarded, the parts have failed and there has been little to no offer of assistance from this engine builder for warranty even though I all I have requested is parts.

Last edited by damage; 02-27-2015 at 08:05 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2015, 07:55 PM
Senior Club Cobra Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: sac., ca, ca
Cobra Make, Engine: owned Kirkham for 11 years
Posts: 1,033
Not Ranked     
Default

Way to go, David and Barry.
Maurice
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2015, 08:39 PM
750hp's Avatar
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Brisbane, Australia, Q
Cobra Make, Engine: Contemporary CCX3117 427FE
Posts: 4,381
Not Ranked     
Default

With Barry R's input and the concept of Kirkham billet cammer heads, this thread gets better and better. I hope it all leads to a satisfactory outcome.
__________________
Craig
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2015, 08:42 PM
RodKnock's Avatar
Senior Club Cobra Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Cobra Make, Engine: KMP 539, a Ton of Aluminum
Posts: 9,592
Not Ranked     
Default

And finally, there is/was never any doubt in my mind that Kirkham Motorsport is AWESOME!

Yes, I am a customer for this reason.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 02-28-2015, 12:53 PM
Dimis's Avatar
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Melbourne, Vic
Cobra Make, Engine: Some polish thing... With some old engine
Posts: 2,286
Not Ranked     
Default

Ummm. I think you blokes HAVE missed something.
Or at least are reading things quite differently to me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by damage View Post
This is the email from my engineer here in Australia.

"Sent: Tuesday, 24 February 2015 2:38 PM
To: David Trask
Subject: HEADS

Hello David,

Attached are photos of the heads with crack test die on them.
You can see on the welded exhaust port head that 3 of the exhaust ports have cracks(one with 2 cracks).
We pushed a scribe through on of the exhaust port walls(at the most 1mm thick).
On the back of the heads in near the rocker gear you can see that there are cracks coming from where the plugs are.
You can see, if you look carefully that one of the plug areas has been welded and polished off and still looks suspect(so they are aware of the problems).
The person who supplied the heads SHOULD 100% supply you with a new set of heads to replace this pair.(FREE OF CHARGE)
Not being rude to you but these heads are **** and have been patched up and unloaded onto you.
The people who did them would be fully aware of how bad they are!
They have been ported too much to suit the casting and have ended up thin.(being thin and having really bad porosity is not good either for down the track).
They need to have some heads ported .040” -.060” per side undersize or get better casting thickness.
Do you want to have a conversation with them before we continue?
The next step for us with the heads is to pressure test them to see if they are going to leak anywhere else apart from the cracks.(eg porosity holes)


Phil "


I have removed his company details deliberately as there is no need to involve him in this dispute.

This is my email to Keith Craft where I politely gave them a piece of my mind.

On Tuesday, February 24, 2015 1:00 AM, David Trask <david@trask> wrote:

"Lance,

Once again no one has responded to me since our last email exchange on 19 February. I’m guessing this was deliberate so I didn’t show up at your workshop while I was in the US.

Please see the email below from the guy here in Australia who is helping me with all the crack testing and machine work that is required.

His email and the photos are self-explanatory, the heads that KC fitted to the engine are substandard (read this as **.

The work that KC did on the heads is poor quality and this has led to further failures. I’m not sure how it is that KC welding up heads on one side of the engine and not supplying port matched heads would be or could be considered a part suppliers problem. This is simply poor workmanship on behalf of KC.

I would like some answers immediately.

Just to remind you of how many times I have emailed you and your responses to date here is a complete outline of all communication on this to date.

DT EMAIL TO KC, My first email to you on this matter was 11/10/14
KC EMAIL TO DT, email You responded and advised me to let you know what parts I needed 11/12/14
DT TO KC, email to Lance I responded acknowledging your request. 11/12/14
DT TO KC, email to Lance Photos of all damaged parts and parts list provided 11/22/14
DT TO KC, email to Lance Requested confirmation of email received 11/22/14
DT TO KC, email to Lance Requested confirmation of email receipt 11/26/14
KC TO DT, email from Lance confirmed receipt of email and forwarded to Keith for his comment 11/27/14. Including photos
DT TO KC, email to Lance acknowledging your email. 11/27/14
DT TO KC, email to Lance and Keith asking for a response 12/11/14
DT TO KC, email to Lance and Keith asking for a response 12/16/14
DT TO KC, email to Lance and Keith asking for a response 12/17/14
DT TO KC, email to Lance and Keith asking for a response 12/23/14
DT TO KC, TELEPHONE CALL spoke to Lance asking for a response 1/7/15 request by yourself to forward photos direct to Keith
DT TO KC, email to Lance confirming telephone conversation 1/7/15 and forwarding photos again
DT TO KC, email to Lance asking for different email address for Keith 1/9/15 because the email address supplied for Keith was incorrect.
KC TO DT, email from Lance saying KC was willing to help 1/10/15
DT TO KC, TELEPHONE CALL to Lance asking what’s going on 1/14/15
DT TO KC, email Keith and Lance forwarding parts list and pictures again as per your request after another telephone call 1/14/15
KC TO DT, email from Lance confirming Keith has been again forwarded all information. 1/14/15 and a copy of an email from Keith to Lance confirming that he wanted photos of all broken parts.
DT TO KC, email to Keith and Lance asking for a time frame on when I will get a response. 1/14/15
DT TO KC, email to Keith with parts list in response to Keith post on Cobra Forum. 2/4/15
KC TO DT, email from Lance confirming that Keith received parts list 2/4/15
DT TO KC, email to Lance confirming his response 2/4/15 and confirming that I have never had a direct response from Keith.
KC TO DT, email from Lance saying he thought I had been in contact with Keith. 2/4/15
DT TO KC, email to Lance stating that Keith has never responded to any emails. 2/5/15
KC TO DT, email from Lance confirming that Keith would have a response tomorrow. 2/5/15
DT TO KC, email to Lance confirming his response 2/5/15.
KC TO DT, email from Lance asking for more information on what happened and how was engine used. 2/7/15
DT TO KC, email to Lance explaining every detail of what occurred with engine. 2/7/15
DT TO KC, email to Lance asking for answers and update on where things were at 2/16/15
KC TO DT, email from Lance stating he would get back to me. 2/17/15
DT TO KC, email to Lance confirming his advice and requesting immediate response. 2/17/15
KC TO DT , email confirming will let me know asap. 2/17/15
DT TO KC, email to Lance asking where we are at 2/19/15

I’ve been more then patient but my patience has run out.



Regards

David Trask
Managing Director


And this is Lances reply

"You would have been more then welcome to come by here while in the US. I would have encouraged it so you could see as many have that we are not a tiny hole in the wall operation with kids building engines. I have spoke with Keith every time I have received emails. I have asked you several times to please email Keith directly. I am stuck in the middle on the deal. All I can do is relay info to him and he has to make the call. I would love to make a call for you but at this time I am not in the position to be able to make these type decisions. The issue with the heads are the core shift in Coons casting s and the reason we no longer use his heads, we now use the Pond. Our cnc machined cuts off the same location every time locating off the head dowel. If it goes thru because of core shift all we can do is weld the heads and pressure test. We do not install without a pressure test off the engine and then inspect on the dyno. I hate that they may have formed a crack after heat cycles on the heads but they would not have been installed if they were leaking here. We have absolutely no desire for any customers to have any issues with our engine. I was able to get Keith to agree to supply front cover and entire timing assembly from Pond as we feel these are the best kits out at this time. Please send an address and I will have the parts drop shipped. Once again I apologize for the issues and wish I could have helped you get answers sooner. Thanks

Lance Smith
Ph 870-246-7460
Fx 870-246-7418
3157 Hwy 26 W
Arkadelphia, AR 71923"



Whilst I appreciate that Lance is making every effort or at least appears to be trying to help out the response from Keith (the company owner) is far from satisfactory as a timing cover and chains are at best about $1,000 worth of parts and not everything required to fix the motor.

How on earth could damage send the engine back?
I mean KC have been negligent in returning calls & emails.
Would you trust them with getting the engine back to you?

Seemingly, Damage was also only just recently in the USA trying to organise a meet, KC dropped the ball on that too.
Lance from KC stated in his email to damage that Keith himself wasn't helping to resolve the situation.

What if YOU WANTED THE BEST OF THE BEST and discovered that the local bloke is better than the famed alternative you bought the engine off.
Would you send it back after being burnt off so many times just for the KC badge?

David Kirkham himself gave you damage's background
He knows elite quality work and didn't see it in his KC engine.

I've resisted the urge to pile on bc it does no one any good, but what if I told you I know of 3 blokes that this has happened to with KC. They fought it then cut their losses and ran.
Granted their engines didn't cost $60k. And whether keith himself built them is debatable. But they were KC Buiilt engines.

How easy is it to play the game of bluff on keith part, asking damage to ship the engine back from the other side of the world. When in actual fact they can't / haven't even supplied the JUST the parts required.

Gentleman damage isn't shooting bambi.
Bambi is seemingly tired, and not helping his cause!

Why are you all so quick to blame the victim here?

I don't think I've read it wrong! But no doubt you all tell me different.
FatBoy and RodKnock like this.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 02-28-2015, 01:21 PM
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 556
Not Ranked     
Default

I can think of a couple of reasons why damage would opt to not send the motor back, and shipping costs isn't one of them.

What tweaks were made to the motor after received? I hear rego registration is a biatch for you boomerang chuckers down under.

Was Joe Gibbs oil being used? A warranty requirement.

Maybe trying to fix something that isn't broken? Not at all uncommon in these here parts, damage seems like a guy who likes to fiddle with things.

Just say'in
Joe
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 02-28-2015, 02:01 PM
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Carlsbad, Ca
Cobra Make, Engine: SPF 2932 with 438 Lykins Motorsports engine. Previous owner of FFR 5452.
Posts: 2,616
Not Ranked     
Default

As KC stated back on February First.
The chain broke, valves hit pistons. Not an assembly failure, a parts failure. Send the engine back and he will fix it. The fact that you don't want to and choose to air your concerns on this forum is, once again, your choice. As far as I see, there was no problem with the heads, only the timing chain. They may have been reworked too much, but they didn't fail. The chain did, and when valves start hitting pistons, cracks can appear everywhere. Whether they were there before or after the incident is pure speculation. Needless to say, they won't be going back on the engine. The bottom end is probably fine but needs inspection to be safe. So, once again, end all this and simply sent the box of parts back and let him honor his warranty.

If I built that engine, then I personally would want to inspect it and the damage after the failure. I wouldn't take anyone's word unless they were my authorized agent. If you want it fixed, send it back and let him do it.

You may not want to have KC do the rebuild, and that is your choice. But then don't expect him to just send you a bunch of parts either. That's not how warranties work.
__________________
Jim
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 02-28-2015, 01:38 PM
philminotti's Avatar
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Orange, CT
Cobra Make, Engine: KMP 736 Street, Pond 482, FAST XFI EFI
Posts: 339
Not Ranked     
Default

Hey Joe,

Why don't you take your whole 20 posts and crawl back under that bridge you came out from under. And take NYGuy with you...
FatBoy, RodKnock and joyridin' like this.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 02-28-2015, 02:27 PM
damage's Avatar
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: redcliffe, qld
Cobra Make, Engine: Kirkham 427SC 482 Cammer
Posts: 700
Not Ranked     
Default

Yeh right rend it back and get him to fix it.

3 months to get an answer that only came about because he got aggravated with what was on this forum. He could have quite easily have said that 1 week after the first email.

If it takes 3 months to get a reply I couldn't imagine how long a low priority non paying warranty claim would take to get repaired.

The cost prohibition that I spoke of well that was basically my polite way of saying I didn't want to gamble loosing my motor for 12 months or more.
FatBoy and RodKnock like this.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 02-28-2015, 02:40 PM
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Carlsbad, Ca
Cobra Make, Engine: SPF 2932 with 438 Lykins Motorsports engine. Previous owner of FFR 5452.
Posts: 2,616
Not Ranked     
Default

Why not give him the chance to make it right and then rake him over the coals if he fails to perform in a timely manner.

I bet if you kept us all apprised of his progress, it would speed up its completion.
KC sells a bunch of engines to people just like us and I'm sure he wants this problem resolved as much as you do. If you give him the chance and he fails to perform, then we'll all jump onto your bandwagon.

As it stands right now, I can see both sides and don't think either side is completely right or wrong.

Just more of my own opinions. And we all know what they smell like!
__________________
Jim
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 02-28-2015, 04:44 PM
Dimis's Avatar
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Melbourne, Vic
Cobra Make, Engine: Some polish thing... With some old engine
Posts: 2,286
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jhv48 View Post
Why not give him the chance to make it right and then rake him over the coals if he fails to perform in a timely manner.

I bet if you kept us all apprised of his progress, it would speed up its completion.
KC sells a bunch of engines to people just like us and I'm sure he wants this problem resolved as much as you do. If you give him the chance and he fails to perform, then we'll all jump onto your bandwagon.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but is this not exactly what Damage has done?
How much longer would you have waited?

According to him this things been going on for months now.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 02-28-2015, 05:01 PM
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Carlsbad, Ca
Cobra Make, Engine: SPF 2932 with 438 Lykins Motorsports engine. Previous owner of FFR 5452.
Posts: 2,616
Not Ranked     
Default

The way I read it is KC ultimately said send it back and I'll fix it but Trask said no, he didn't trust KC any longer and was going to have the work done locally but wanted KC to provide the parts. KC, understandably, doesn't want to provide the parts without inspecting the damage for himself.

Thus, a stalemate.
__________________
Jim
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
The representations expressed are the representations and opinions of the clubcobra.com forum members and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and viewpoints of the site owners, moderators, Shelby American, any other replica manufacturer, Ford Motor Company. This website has been planned and developed by clubcobra.com and its forum members and should not be construed as being endorsed by Ford Motor Company, or Shelby American or any other manufacturer unless expressly noted by that entity. "Cobra" and the Cobra logo are registered trademarks for Ford Motor Co., Inc. clubcobra.com forum members agree not to post any copyrighted material unless the copyrighted material is owned by you. Although we do not and cannot review the messages posted and are not responsible for the content of any of these messages, we reserve the right to delete any message for any reason whatsoever. You remain solely responsible for the content of your messages, and you agree to indemnify and hold us harmless with respect to any claim based upon transmission of your message(s). Thank you for visiting clubcobra.com. For full policy documentation refer to the following link: CC Policy
Links monetized by VigLink