CSX 6000 at Barrett-Jackson

[REAL 1]

Yeah. And CSX 3003 is a replica of CSX 3002 and so on and so on .....

[SP01715]

Originally Posted by REAL 1

Yeah. And CSX 3003 is a replica of CSX 3002 and so on and so on .....

If not a replica, then IMO they should be titled/sold as the actual year they were built. I know here in California they could not be titled as a 65, but calling them a 65 Cobra is deceptive. My.02

[somedayaurora]

Here Here make them like Autokraft but you know faster . I feel this may have gotten in the woods abit and I agree with both sides It is a genuine shelby , just not an original Shelby cobra . The same but different , a 66 mustang is a ford mustang as is a '11 mustang is mustang . Maybe if we call it a '06 Shelby Cobra 427 eveybody might relent a bit . Hey it could be worse , we could be here *****ing about corvette's instead of you know -best car ever-!
SDR

[RedBarchetta]

Originally Posted by somedayaurora

...a 66 mustang is a ford mustang as is a '11 mustang is mustang

Copied body lines...I wouldn't be so sure. Maybe the new Mustangs are actually "continuation series" of the originals?
Same for the '69/'10 Camaro.

[computerworks]

Originally Posted by REAL 1

Yeah. And CSX 3003 is a replica of CSX 3002 and so on and so on .....

of course not. That's just a silly statement.