Club Cobra Gas-N Exhaust  

Go Back   Club Cobra > Cobra Talk Areas > ALL COBRA TALK

Keith Craft Racing
Nevada Classics
MMG Superformance
Main Menu
Module Jump:
Nevada Classics
Nevada Classics
MMG Superformance
Keith Craft Racing
Advertise at CC
Banner Ad Rates
Keith Craft Racing
MMG Superformance
MMG Superformance
Keith Craft Racing
November 2025
S M T W T F S
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            

Kirkham Motorsports

Like Tree13Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-24-2011, 01:09 PM
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Driftwood, TX
Cobra Make, Engine: Contemporary Cobra, 427 side oiler
Posts: 1,850
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SunDude View Post
Sounds like FFR used modern techniques/technology to achieve the same goal as a traditional splash. Perhaps I'll add FFR MkIV and CSX3035 to the list, then.
At the risk of ruffling FFR owner feathers, that would be an erroneous correlation in my opinion. I have spent several hours overlaying Mk4 pics over 3035 and its just not a derivative in the same way a "splash" is derived. The efforts to deviate from 3035, either intentional or otherwise, make it too different to be compared in the same way that CCX is derived from 3045.

Thanks for putting in this effort.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-24-2011, 01:45 PM
CobraEd's Avatar
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Northern VA, VA
Cobra Make, Engine: Classic Roadsters
Posts: 2,765
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elmariachi View Post
At the risk of ruffling FFR owner feathers, that would be an erroneous correlation in my opinion. I have spent several hours overlaying Mk4 pics over 3035 and its just not a derivative in the same way a "splash" is derived. The efforts to deviate from 3035, either intentional or otherwise, make it too different to be compared in the same way that CCX is derived from 3045.

Thanks for putting in this effort.
gotta be a tough way to do it. Why not splash it ?????



.
__________________
LIFE IS TOO SHORT TO WORRY ABOUT GOOD GAS MILEAGE
________
Utinam logica falsa tuam philosophiam totam suffodiant!
________

Last edited by CobraEd; 01-24-2011 at 01:52 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-24-2011, 01:47 PM
CobraEd's Avatar
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Northern VA, VA
Cobra Make, Engine: Classic Roadsters
Posts: 2,765
Not Ranked     
Default

Anyone know how the hel they made the Classic Roadsters. It has different dimensions ???


.
__________________
LIFE IS TOO SHORT TO WORRY ABOUT GOOD GAS MILEAGE
________
Utinam logica falsa tuam philosophiam totam suffodiant!
________
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 01-24-2011, 01:59 PM
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Driftwood, TX
Cobra Make, Engine: Contemporary Cobra, 427 side oiler
Posts: 1,850
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CobraEd View Post
gotta be a tough way to do it. Why not splash it ?????.
The process of digitizing and scanning in the 3035 body would have been very straight-forward using today's technology. As to why FFR chose to not to reproduce the 3035 is anybody's guess. I could not get any of the body lines to match up between 3035 and the new car. The nose is different, as are the door lines/openings as well as the rear fenders. Maybe they are saving the scan it for a Dick Smith tribute car or something.

"Splashing" a body the old-fashioned way, especially off of a fragile aluminum car is tedious but not rocket science. The story I was told about when the Hurricane car was copied was that it took all of a day to take the molds from the body. But they did it while the CSX car was assembled, and they did it in pieces. So the hard part was then to get it all back together into a unified body mold.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 01-24-2011, 05:10 PM
TButtrick's Avatar
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 1,330
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elmariachi View Post
The process of digitizing and scanning in the 3035 body would have been very straight-forward using today's technology. As to why FFR chose to not to reproduce the 3035 is anybody's guess. I could not get any of the body lines to match up between 3035 and the new car. The nose is different, as are the door lines/openings as well as the rear fenders. Maybe they are saving the scan it for a Dick Smith tribute car or something.

"Splashing" a body the old-fashioned way, especially off of a fragile aluminum car is tedious but not rocket science. The story I was told about when the Hurricane car was copied was that it took all of a day to take the molds from the body. But they did it while the CSX car was assembled, and they did it in pieces. So the hard part was then to get it all back together into a unified body mold.
I think FFR "morphed" the digitized version of 3035 rather than splashing it. Most likely an economic choice to keep the existing frame (for the most part) and morphed the body to the existing frame and changing the shape in the process. An improvement but still worlds apart from a "splash" of 3035.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 01-24-2011, 05:23 PM
CobraEd's Avatar
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Northern VA, VA
Cobra Make, Engine: Classic Roadsters
Posts: 2,765
Not Ranked     
Default

It seems to me that splashing a car is very easy although a little time consuming. Why would FF do it the hard way only to end up with a non-accurate car. Seems very odd.

My Classic Roadsters is longer and wider than an original. I wonder how they did that one given that it can't be taken from an original by splashing or digitally. Maybe DV knows.


.
__________________
LIFE IS TOO SHORT TO WORRY ABOUT GOOD GAS MILEAGE
________
Utinam logica falsa tuam philosophiam totam suffodiant!
________
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 01-24-2011, 05:40 PM
TButtrick's Avatar
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 1,330
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CobraEd View Post
It seems to me that splashing a car is very easy although a little time consuming. Why would FF do it the hard way only to end up with a non-accurate car. Seems very odd.

My Classic Roadsters is longer and wider than an original. I wonder how they did that one given that it can't be taken from an original by splashing or digitally. Maybe DV knows.


.
I think "the hard way", from FFRs perspective, would have been to splash 3035 or exactingly digitize it and then redesign, retool, remanufacture a new frame to fit to a dimensionally new body. When FFR fit a Kirkham body to their existing frame, it was a whole lot more than they had anticipated. Not even a close fit but it was the data they needed to do what they did with the MKIV.

Last edited by TButtrick; 01-24-2011 at 05:45 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 01-24-2011, 05:54 PM
PaulProe's Avatar
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Manchester, MO
Cobra Make, Engine: Hurricane - FE
Posts: 627
Not Ranked     
Default Info on FFR Mk IV

SunDude,
To provide correct information to your statements, FFR personnel working the SEMA show this fall gave me this information:

The rear trunk and fenders came from the scans of Smith’s car(3035). The cockpit is from the Mark III except they rolled the edges. The hood and front end came from the molds they had on the Contemporary car.

It is really a hybrid. Some of the lines came from an original but the Mk IV car as a whole did not

Paul
__________________
www.65shlb.com
www.prdcrrct.com
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
The representations expressed are the representations and opinions of the clubcobra.com forum members and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and viewpoints of the site owners, moderators, Shelby American, any other replica manufacturer, Ford Motor Company. This website has been planned and developed by clubcobra.com and its forum members and should not be construed as being endorsed by Ford Motor Company, or Shelby American or any other manufacturer unless expressly noted by that entity. "Cobra" and the Cobra logo are registered trademarks for Ford Motor Co., Inc. clubcobra.com forum members agree not to post any copyrighted material unless the copyrighted material is owned by you. Although we do not and cannot review the messages posted and are not responsible for the content of any of these messages, we reserve the right to delete any message for any reason whatsoever. You remain solely responsible for the content of your messages, and you agree to indemnify and hold us harmless with respect to any claim based upon transmission of your message(s). Thank you for visiting clubcobra.com. For full policy documentation refer to the following link: CC Policy
Links monetized by VigLink