 
Main Menu
|
Nevada Classics
|
Advertise at CC
|
| S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
| 2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
| 9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
| 16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
| 23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
| 30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CC Advertisers
|
|

04-05-2011, 01:29 AM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Ashburton, New Zealand,
..
Cobra Make, Engine: UK Ram SC. KC-Yates 373, Jerico 5 speed.
Posts: 1,240
|
|
Not Ranked
K&N Extreme filter top
I have seen a heap of very very fast track cars with the K&N extreme top on them, and they normally have outside air ducted in, not underbonnet heated air!
I would think that KN have made a better flowing air filter where there isnt room for a great 4 -6" high filter, although the extreme filter needs a good space above it for the air to turn in..
Jac, Chaz and Tom you have all hit it right on, firstly tune you carb to suit the filter, then you might be able to make a simple alloy tray with the Moroso foam sealer around it to get free cold air from your scoop, as hopefully separating the under hood pressure should make a difference, and then I would do a some mixture checks. I cant see a major difference in jetting providing your carb is correct for your engine and normally you dont need to go too far from std jetting. I had the Jac Mac scenario of air filter top to close to the bowl air tubes and ended up about 10 sizes rich, until we cut tubes on an angle to stop the air flowing across the carb affecting the way the fuel flows through the main jets, and I went back to std jetting etc!
__________________
A J. Newton
The 1960's rocked!
|

04-06-2011, 10:38 AM
|
 |
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Scottsdale,
AZ
Cobra Make, Engine: Superformance, Roush 427R-095, Pro Systems carb, 2" headers, Buckshot Racefab side pipes, 10s off idle start
Posts: 705
|
|
Not Ranked
If you can put more air into an engine then you can increase the fuel supply and produce more power.
If the Cobra is kept under 80 mph it probably doesn't matter either way, but a disadvantage to using a carbureted engine with a set fuel delivery value might be you don't have a computer to increase the fuel as load is increased with speed and while exponential amounts of air are being forced into the engine the faster you go.
It seems logical that the choice is either tune the engine for cruising around an have lean conditions at high speed or tune for high speed and have a rich condition at low speed. A forced air system without a computer seems would increase the effect.
Lower temperature air entering is always an advantage.
|

04-06-2011, 10:50 AM
|
 |
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Northern VA,
VA
Cobra Make, Engine: Classic Roadsters
Posts: 2,765
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by greg schroeder
It seems logical that the choice is either tune the engine for cruising around an have lean conditions at high speed or tune for high speed and have a rich condition at low speed.
|
This is why carbs have an idle/low speed circuit for low to mid range part throttle cruising and main jets for wider fully open throttle opening and high power.
You can set the low speed circuit lean for good cruising economy and set the main jets rich for max power. That is what a carb does.
.
__________________
LIFE IS TOO SHORT TO WORRY ABOUT GOOD GAS MILEAGE
________
Utinam logica falsa tuam philosophiam totam suffodiant!
________
Last edited by CobraEd; 04-06-2011 at 11:00 AM..
|

04-06-2011, 03:26 PM
|
 |
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Dadeville,
AL
Cobra Make, Engine: Sold my EM.
Posts: 2,459
|
|
Not Ranked
I have run the K&N Filter top on my car for more than eight years. I've never done a side-by-side test with a regular top, so I can't offer an objective evaluation of that matter. However, after my last engine rebuild, I did tune the carb jets with the filter top and it runs fine with air from the scoop blasting down from above. I'll add that as an aerospace engineer, it's hard to me to guess what the airflow under the air filter might look like. It would take some serious testing or major supercomputer calculations for anyone to really know, and it would likely be different for each particular engine and set of conditions. ... All in all, I agree with Mr. Kirkham.
__________________
Tommy
Cheetah tribute completed 2021 (TommysCars.Weebly.com)
Previously owned EM Cobra
"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." - Hanlon's Razor
|

04-06-2011, 04:20 PM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,078
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tommy
I have run the K&N Filter top on my car for more than eight years.
|
So obviously Tommy, the cars runs better with it -right??
I think all the science boils down to-it works better or not.
Mine works better-no fears about vents, clearance, turbulence or linguine...
__________________
Chas.
|

04-06-2011, 04:52 PM
|
 |
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: West Suburbs of Chicago,
IL
Cobra Make, Engine: Backdraft#357, 392CI Ford Racing, 459hp, 455ft/lbs , TKO 500, 3.43 Gears, Ceramic Coated Headers, Victor Jr. 750cfm, 17in Halibrand wheels, Sterling Gray/Silver Stripes, Gray Leather, Nitto NT05
Posts: 362
|
|
Not Ranked
Here's a side by side dyno test with and without filter top
Here are a couple dyno sheets. The filter top got 9 more hp in this example. It was a back-to-back test. I also got my highest dyno numbers using it. There is a science to this so I don't claim to know the answer, I suspect that after reading all of your posts you are all right; it depends on the car, jetting, air flow, turbulance and that dyno testing may not always be conclusive, but in THIS CASE, the filter top made more HP. It seems an unreasonable conclusion that the filter top would never produce more HP for any car set up or engine and carb combo or that it will always have turbulance or air flow issues. But, it seems just as unreasonable to dismiss all of these first hand accounts about airflow problems, but now you have at least one dyno test to support the "pro filter-top camp". Dyno Sheet - HP and Torque Question
__________________
1/4 mile 11.92@115.6 and 60ft 1.632
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:59 PM.
Links monetized by VigLink
|