 
Main Menu
|
|
Nevada Classics
|
|
Advertise at CC
|
| S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
| 2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
| 9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
| 16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
| 23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
| 30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CC Advertisers
|
|
 1Likes
06-13-2012, 10:34 AM
|
 |
Senior Club Cobra Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Cobra Make, Engine: KMP 539, a Ton of Aluminum
Posts: 9,592
|
|
Not Ranked
I believe from other threads that the OP has started that he is considering a Backdraft or Superformance. And while you can certainly install an FE, SBF's are the predominant choice for a powerplant in BDR's and SPF's.
|
06-13-2012, 11:08 AM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2012
Cobra Make, Engine:
Posts: 44
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by RodKnock
I believe from other threads that the OP has started that he is considering a Backdraft or Superformance. And while you can certainly install an FE, SBF's are the predominant choice for a powerplant in BDR's and SPF's.
|
Yes, those were and as of right now still my top 2 choices. I don't have time, nor the tools nor the skills to tackle a full kit..  I need a roller and even that will be a turnkey when it comes to me.  Unless of course I change my mind and commission someone build me a replica??? 
What is the main reason for the choice of SBFs for Superformance and Backdraft? |
06-13-2012, 12:15 PM
|
|
Senior Club Cobra Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Cobra Make, Engine: KMP 539, a Ton of Aluminum
Posts: 9,592
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by PHC1
What is the main reason for the choice of SBFs for Superformance and Backdraft? |
I believe SBF's are the overwhelming choice for BDR's and SPF's, because, and I'll probably get hammered here, they're less expensive choices than a CSX, KMP and ERA, plus maybe, folks who choose a BDR and SPF are slightly less concerned about adherence to the original. FE's are heavier, less so with aluminum blocks and heads, and more expensive to build. |
06-13-2012, 12:17 PM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2012
Cobra Make, Engine:
Posts: 44
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by RodKnock
I believe SBF's are the overwhelming choice for BDR's and SPF's, because, and I'll probably get hammered here, they're less expensive choices than a CSX, KMP and ERA, plus maybe, folks who choose a BDR and SPF are slightly less concerned about adherence to the original. FE's are heavier, less so with aluminum blocks and heads, and more expensive to build.
|
Ok, makes sense.. Sorry to have asked you to stick your neck out like that but I figured with your post count you will survive intact!  |
06-13-2012, 12:20 PM
|
 |
Backdraft Racing Dealer
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: North Haven,
CT
Cobra Make, Engine: Backdraft Racing
Posts: 5,124
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by RodKnock
I believe SBF's are the overwhelming choice for BDR's and SPF's, because, and I'll probably get hammered here, they're less expensive choices than a CSX, KMP and ERA, plus maybe, folks who choose a BDR and SPF are slightly less concerned about adherence to the original. FE's are heavier, less so with aluminum blocks and heads, and more expensive to build.
|
I never understood why the FEs are less popular in the SPFs. But from the BDR perspective meeting a predefined version of a "Cobra" is not the reason a customer selects BDR, so from there on out it's about optimizing the car to their tastes, use, and budget.
One of my favorite BDRs to drive to date has a Roush 451 in it. I get to drive it every couple years ... great engine and not a drip or drop of oil to this day. |
06-13-2012, 01:04 PM
|
|
Senior Club Cobra Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Cobra Make, Engine: KMP 539, a Ton of Aluminum
Posts: 9,592
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cashburn
I never understood why the FEs are less popular in the SPFs. But from the BDR perspective meeting a predefined version of a "Cobra" is not the reason a customer selects BDR, so from there on out it's about optimizing the car to their tastes, use, and budget.
|
Obviously having a business relationship with engine builder such as Roush may contribute to the reason why most SPF's and BDR's have SBF's. For whatever reason, there are alot of Roush SBF's in BDR's and SPF's. The Roush BBF's are about the same price as BDR or SPF roller, so that could be just one reason for the lack of BBF's in BDR's and SPF's.
Last edited by RodKnock; 06-13-2012 at 01:10 PM..
Reason: tense correction
|
06-13-2012, 01:08 PM
|
|
Backdraft Racing Dealer
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: North Haven,
CT
Cobra Make, Engine: Backdraft Racing
Posts: 5,124
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by RodKnock
Obviously having a business relationship with engine builder such as Roush may have contribute to the reason why most SPF's and BDR's have SBF's. For whatever reason, there are alot of Roush SBF's in BDR's and SPF's. The Roush BBF's are about the same price as BDR or SPF roller, so that could be just one reason for the lack of BBF's in BDR's and SPF's.
|
It may have a slight influence but not much anymore. Very few Roush engines going out the door the last 2+ years. Adding to some of the reluctance on the BDR with FE builds is the headers are generally not stocked etc.
There's also a lot of SPFs with Ford Racing 460s ... that would be a tip to the cost factor. |
06-13-2012, 01:11 PM
|
|
Senior Club Cobra Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Cobra Make, Engine: KMP 539, a Ton of Aluminum
Posts: 9,592
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cashburn
Very few Roush engines going out the door the last 2+ years.
|
I wonder why? |
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:55 PM.
Links monetized by VigLink
|
