Misconceptions

[REAL 1]

The entire "replica" issue is a red herring to me. That term has taken a number of definitions and each person applies the definition he wants. Others are caught up in that term using the definition they believe is correct or supports their position.

The "kit" issue to me is immaterial also.

Couldn't care less really about those terms as the arguments are circular based on the definitions used at the time.

Some here, however, can't see past these terms and can't or won't see or refuse to see the simple answer.

One thing that is not debatable is that the Continuation Cobras are Shelby Cobras factually and legally and the only car that can leave its MSO seller legally being referred to and identified as a Cobra or a Shelby Cobra by the MSO seller. You also have the SAAC World Registry. Simple answer.

Factually and legally anything that is not a Shelby Cobra (save for a few exceptions) are not factually and legally "Cobras" at all but merely copies of Cobras. Nothing wrong with that but that's what it is. What's comical to me is that everyone here that doesn't own a Shelby Cobra and participating on this thread takes umbrage at being told they don't own a Cobra but a copy when they themselves know they own a fake but at the same time have no problem telling me I don't own a real Shelby Cobra and in fact delight in trying to explain why I don't own a real Shelby Cobra when I obviously do. Again, facts, law and Registry.

You guys do know you own fake Cobras right?

Game over.