Why does every thread here devolve into a "Real" vs. "Replica" argument?

[RodKnock]

Originally Posted by REAL 1

That's your "interpretation"? "Deleted"? Of course you would interpret it that way. Uh, The Registry came out after that statement to my knowledge and recollection. Moreover, the new "statement" doesn't change or retract a thing as far as what the Registry says.

So if the Registry said what you want it to say. Its gospel right? Being that it doesn't it's trash and illogical. You are clearly desparte to have it say what you want it to say. Its actually funny to watch.

Of course no other Cobra is accorded "equal status" as the original series are accorded. Duh. And your point is? Seems your actually becoming delusional.

Oh, btw the SAAC forum still separates discussions of the CSX Cobras both original and Current production from the forum for discussion for "Replica and Tribute".

Nothing has changed except your desperation.

Also, just what is Ned a "curator" of? We know he is the Registar of the CSX 3000 series for SAAC. So? We know he is "biased" towards the original cars and condescending to the current production Cobras. Speaks volumes as far as I'm concerned with regard to any of his comments on this subject. Not impressed.

You keep quoting the Registry as gospel, what, now it isn't?

When it suits your position, it's the Book of Evan. When it doesn't, it's trash.

Your "knowledge and recollection" of the dates when the Registry and The SAAC Statement came out means nothing, because you're posting a SAAC website statement that's at least 8 years old and saying its current. Ya sure right. I believe you and your knowledge and recollection.

Bottom line is that "genuine" is now gone! The registry will be next, but until then it still references your Shelby Cobra as a true replica and Conra-like. We all see the direction that SAAC is going, even if you don't.