Why does every thread here devolve into a "Real" vs. "Replica" argument?

[LMH]

Originally Posted by REAL 1

Simple. 14 years after that according to SAAC they did it so well and their supply of bodies and chassis to Shelby American analogous to AC in the 60s they are considered "Cobras" by SAAC and registered as such in the Registry not merely "replicas or kits" as defined by SAAC. Hey, they are the world recognized authority not me. For me its "what they said". I'm good with that.

Kirkham still does refer to their cars as "kits" for business purposes based on existing federal regulations. I know this from direct personal discussions. If the Federal legislation Tony speaks of is passed their reference by Kirkham to their own cars (masterful works of art) will likely change.

Not the same, keep history accurate. We've been over this before.
AC Cars Ltd did not supply SAI with bodies and chassis. In general terms for the CSX series cars, AC Cars sent SAI complete cars less engine and transmission assemblies. The cars were set up and engineered for the drivetrain in England but installed at SAI in the states. Cars had suspension, steering, brakes, wiring, wheels, tires, paint, interior, etc.
While Kirkham may supply current SA with bodies and chassis that are built into current CSX cars, it's not the same or similar to how the original cars were built.
Continue.
Larry