 
Main Menu
|
Nevada Classics
|
Advertise at CC
|
| S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
| 2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
| 9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
| 16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
| 23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
| 30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CC Advertisers
|
|
1Likes

01-05-2012, 09:43 AM
|
|
Senior Club Cobra Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Las Vegas,
NV
Cobra Make, Engine: ERA 427 SO
Posts: 1,126
|
|
Not Ranked
G-Pete, I thought I posted some "real-world" results on this thread early-on, but maybe not. Here you go:
I have a mild 2x4 sideoiler with 2 600 CFM Holleys. The guys in Houston all decide to do a "dyno day". I put mine on it, did two back-to-back pulls and got 394 RWHP with stock paper filters on the S&H housings, and 402 RWHP with just the base of the S&H housings on the carbs (I've been told that without the base of the housing the airflow into the carb gets disrupted).
That makes 7 RWHP difference between paper elements and no elements, up through 5500 RPM. The reason I run paper elements is because the K&N elements let way more fine particles through, and for 7 HP, it isn't worth it.
Now for the guys with one big carb, the single S&H filter seems way too small, but for me, it works. And FWIW, Double Venom's tuft work confirms what I had always suspected, the hood scoop is good looking, but fairly worthless, and any benefit you'd get from cool air by sealing your carb to the hood would be lost by starving the engine for air (at higher RPM). JMHO.
__________________
Ken
|

01-08-2012, 09:17 AM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: St. Louisville,
Oh
Cobra Make, Engine: A&C 67 427 cobra SB
Posts: 2,445
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by mr0077
And FWIW, Double Venom's tuft work confirms what I had always suspected, the hood scoop is good looking, but fairly worthless, and any benefit you'd get from cool air by sealing your carb to the hood would be lost by starving the engine for air (at higher RPM). JMHO.
|
Is the restriction the small air filter you are forced to use by the turkey pan or the scoop?
|

01-08-2012, 11:00 AM
|
 |
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Southbury,
ct
Cobra Make, Engine: ERA, 428, 4 speed Toploader, Jag rear, Red with White stripes
Posts: 928
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by olddog
Is the restriction the small air filter you are forced to use by the turkey pan or the scoop?
|
It is definitely because of the turkey pan, not the scoop!
I have had the Turkey pan off my engine, and without it I can put a 14 inch drop down air cleaner that flows over 1000 cfm with no interference to the hood or scoop. I just hated the way it looked. I also had a ram-box fitted to my car at one time and it looked much better, but i did not like the quality of the ram-box chrome finish at that time, so i abandoned the idea, but I plan on re-visiting this idea when I put on the new high flow side pipes, hopefully this year. I did put some pics in another thread at that time on this forum I believe.
|

01-08-2012, 11:19 AM
|
 |
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Southbury,
ct
Cobra Make, Engine: ERA, 428, 4 speed Toploader, Jag rear, Red with White stripes
Posts: 928
|
|
Not Ranked
Here is one of the threads. I did try and post pics, but the size restrictions were to small. I will try to post them again.
If any one wants some pics of my trial fit, send me an email to davids2toys@charter.net
click here for link Has anyone considered something like this for an air cleaner?
Last edited by davids2toys; 01-08-2012 at 11:20 AM..
Reason: added text
|

01-08-2012, 02:20 PM
|
 |
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Southbury,
ct
Cobra Make, Engine: ERA, 428, 4 speed Toploader, Jag rear, Red with White stripes
Posts: 928
|
|
Not Ranked
some more pics
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:21 AM.
Links monetized by VigLink
|