![]() |
Quote:
Maybe you could call the original 60's Cobra's "factory-built kits", since CS assembled parts and seemed to put in them whatever he had at the moment (427's/ 428's, whatever). A look at the shapes and specs sometimes seems like practically no two were the same... :) SAAC calls the 60's cars "original" and the later vehicles "authentic", I believe.... Seems fair. |
ANyone else notice the hit and run tactic of the original instigator of this thread. :D . Seems to me like Evan borrowed a friends AOL account and decided to come out and play after all.
|
Quote:
I guess it would be state by state. In MD we have salvage titles. This is issued when a car is totaled and then bought my someone. They use to not give you a title from the junkyard. I bought a parts car 25 years ago and all I got was a bill of sale. Now we have salvage titles. Question 1; If you change the frame on your car(if your car has a frame) can the car retain the same title? Question 2; What came first the chicken or the egg?:D question 3; Was this discussed before? |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
But does it really matter what they are called just as long as they are enjoyed by their respective owners? |
Quote:
Or..."Resumption under fraudulent terms: ie outright lying about the origin of the chassis in an attempt to cash in on the popularity of a car he had turned his back on 30 years ago." I'm sure there are other equally appropriate adjectives. Lowell |
Continuation CSX a "Kit Car"?
MrMustang,
Not intended to be a "hit & run". Not able to get back to the computer until now. Many interesting views. My real reason for asking the question relates to language in a proposed bill in NJ that I have assisted on to get certain exemption status for the "replicas" and "kit cars". I noticed on a website for a new CSX Continuation Shelby Cobra that it was being sold as a 1965 Titled car. I spoke to an owner of a CSX Shelby this past week at a local cruise night that recently registered his car in NJ as a 1965 with no problem. So, if they are "replicas" (real or not) how are some making it through the "system"? In some States, "Kit cars" and "replicas" are treated differently. Just trying to do my part to help improve the titling and registration process in NJ. Al |
Quote:
Bill S. PS: Spent 11 years working with the NJDMV and the NJRC (New Jersey Replica Club) on such clarifications.....With the closing down of the NJRC and several of it's more active participants no longer interacting with the NJDMV, things have gotten muddied up in the political arena......... |
Bill,
Thanks for the feedback. There was a Bill introduced in Assembly several weeks ago and a similar one to be introduced in the Senate this coming week. Both proposed Bills were reviewed by SEMA and suggested changes were made. If you go to the ffcobra forum you can see email threads and a copy of the proposed Bill. Hopefully there is alot of interest and support from the NJ enthusiasts whether they are already registered or not. All can support the proposed Bills by reaching out to their legislators. Al |
Titling any MODERN Cobra (built after 1967 by other than AC/Shelby) as purely a 1965 is fraught with all kinds of potential problems and it has nothing to do with the car being a 'kit' or a 'continution' or whatever you want to call it. People HAVE gone to jail for doing it incorrectly, others are getting away with it, for the time being. The laws vary from state to state, but make no mistake, it's playing with fire. A MODERN 1965 Cobra titled as such in one state and sold in California as a 'real' 1965 could be a serious problem down the road.
Shelby's MSO, as I understand it, correctly identifies the car as a 1965 MODEL, which should not be confused with year of build. Likewise Hawaii law recognizes my Cobra as a 1965 MODEL, but the title also specifies it as a 'street rod' (Hawaii's way of saying 'modern replica'). |
Quote:
It would have all been legit if Shelby hadn't made the whole thing up, and created those cars by contracting McCluskey to built them from sctratch. |
Quote:
I call mine a POS.:3DSMILE: And I really don't care which one came first, just thought I'd throw that one in for good measure.:p |
Excellent point Sal, and NOT thread drift as I see it. The discussion as to titling, vin numbers, completition series, continuation series, kit vs factory and home builts are all part of the soup (or can of worms as the case may be). :D
Good question concerning HOW a fellow would secure the parts to build his own CSX in his own garage. In addition, how does it get titled and what vin would it use? Such details are not typically discussed on a public forum... :LOL: It will be interesting to see how the registrys handle this, Team Shelby registry and SAAC registry. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Here is the story on 4750
Quote:
|
Shelby Cobras
One way to look at it is that in the sixties, Shelby sold CARS, now he sells PARTS. When you put them together, is it a Shelby? In my opinion, it's a home-made car using parts Shelby sold you, that affords you the opportunity to list it in various Shelby registries. Otherwise as far as I know, it's illegal to title/register it and drive it on any street in the USA.
|
Incorrect: Remember that the Cobra roller which is a car without motor trans and drive shaft is only a small part of their business currently. They are also building GT500 and GT-350 with Ford just like they did in the 60's. I think currently the only other manufacturer that builds a more complete roller might be SPF.
|
Quote:
Fast forward to 2008 where they cannot sell a turn key car directly from Shelby and as such cannot be considered a complete automobile, but instead can and usually is considered a "component vehicle" finished off by the end user or his agent. As for titles (MSO's), since they are now being reproduced in the present, shouldn't the titles (MSO's) read the year they are actually manufactured as to not misrepresent them for something they are not? If Shelby was just building a continuation of his original series (which he is), then don't you think they should be marketed as 2000-2008 Shelby Cobras instead of 1965 Shelby Cobras (as listed on their MSO's and literature)? Again it's more a marketing ploy than anything else, if you buy in to it, great, but do not expect everyone else to blindly follow along. Bill S. |
Quote:
|
Shelby is not building cars
Shelby makes parts. He might fasten some parts together, but he does not make cars in a way that they are legally cars by today's standards.
I don't think Shelby is listed as a "Manufacturer" like Saleen so Shelby does not make cars. (I could be wrong about this and maybe Shelby is listed as a "Manufacturer") As far as I know to title/register and inspect a component car in the USA it is not supposed to be manufactured by anyone other than yourself unless you bought it off a fellow that built it for himself and then sold it. Of course this opens up a big gray area as to what "manufacture" means and if anyone really wanted to push the limits of the laws, we would probably find out that a lot of the businesses making complete rollers that only need engines and transmissions are not at all what the legislators were signing up for when approving these laws, and the bigger that part of the business gets, the more likely the rest of the hobby is to suffer in the long run. Keep in mind this is all my opinion and I am not trying to write this in an explosive fashion. |
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:52 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
The representations expressed are the representations and opinions of the clubcobra.com forum members and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and viewpoints of the site owners, moderators, Shelby American, any other replica manufacturer, Ford Motor Company. This website has been planned and developed by clubcobra.com and its forum members and should not be construed as being endorsed by Ford Motor Company, or Shelby American or any other manufacturer unless expressly noted by that entity. "Cobra" and the Cobra logo are registered trademarks for Ford Motor Co., Inc. clubcobra.com forum members agree not to post any copyrighted material unless the copyrighted material is owned by you. Although we do not and cannot review the messages posted and are not responsible for the content of any of these messages, we reserve the right to delete any message for any reason whatsoever. You remain solely responsible for the content of your messages, and you agree to indemnify and hold us harmless with respect to any claim based upon transmission of your message(s). Thank you for visiting clubcobra.com. For full policy documentation refer to the following link: