Club Cobra

Club Cobra (http://www.clubcobra.com/forums/)
-   ALL COBRA TALK (http://www.clubcobra.com/forums/all-cobra-talk/)
-   -   barrett listed cobra (http://www.clubcobra.com/forums/all-cobra-talk/92419-barrett-listed-cobra.html)

Nedsel 10-23-2008 10:58 PM

Sal, I'm aware of those cars, but I did not think Brian built a 3060.

Power Surge 10-23-2008 11:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nedsel (Post 891958)
Sal, I'm aware of those cars, but I did not think Brian built a 3060.

Me either, I can find out for sure though.

PANAVIA 10-24-2008 01:46 AM

In any project, it takes a team to complete something , in the 1960s Shelby American was just one team that was able to use FORD engines, and AC chassis with some sweat equity and hard work to finish the cars. if shelby HAD NOT come along there might have been a few other AC cars built but possibly not to the level they have been built up to today.

if there is one thing Carroll is good at, it is getting people exited about an idea.

John McMahon 10-24-2008 06:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by REAL 1 (Post 891438)
As usual, I don't think so.

Takes care.

Evan,

Please update your greeting, you are speaking like Baba Looey!

:3DSMILE::3DSMILE::3DSMILE:

http://www.toytokyo.com/productImages/6607_1.jpg

1ntCobra 10-24-2008 07:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nedsel (Post 891948)
If Brian Angliss built cars with chassis numbers like the original Shelby cars but with an extra character, he didn't admit it. AutoKraft, which bought and became the successor entity of AC Cars, generally built new chassis/body composites to reconstruct original Cobras, and they built the AC Mk. IVs. We know Brian has built several cars with unusual VINs, but using the VIN of an S/C that was never built in the original 60's production and then adding a 1 at the end makes no sense at all. Can anyone shed any light on this? :confused:

Ned,

The information that I posted was paraphrased from reading the CSX 3060 entry in the new registry a day earlier.

You must know who the registrar is for the completion cars... Why not ask the registrar?

computerworks 10-24-2008 08:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1ntCobra (Post 892034)
Ned,

The information that I posted was paraphrased from reading the CSX 3060 entry in the new registry a day earlier.

You must know who the registrar is for the completion cars... Why not ask the registrar?

...you just did. :p

Ron61 10-24-2008 08:58 AM

1ntCobra,

Could you tell me what page of the new registry that the information about CSX 3060 is on? I have looked for it in mine and mine goes to 3055 and then the next one listed is 3063. Is it in some special place or is my registry just missing some?

Thanks,

Ron :confused:

1ntCobra 10-24-2008 09:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ron61 (Post 892061)
1ntCobra,

Could you tell me what page of the new registry that the information about CSX 3060 is on? I have looked for it in mine and mine goes to 3055 and then the next one listed is 3063. Is it in some special place or is my registry just missing some?

Thanks,

Ron :confused:

The completion cobras have their own section separate from the original cobras. It might be right before the continuation cobras section. There is a table of contents somewhere that is helpful.

1ntCobra 10-24-2008 09:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by computerworks (Post 892057)
...you just did. :p

Ron,

I know Ned is the registrar for the original cobras. I assumed that Ned was not the registrar for the completion cobras since he seemed unfamiliar with the entry that lists CSX 3060 that mentions the fake CSX 3060. I thought if Ned wrote that, he would recall it instantly since apparently his memory is much better than mine.

By the way, since at least you and I know who the Kirkham registrar is, I was wondering why his picture was not included with the pictures of the other registrars in the beginning of the registry... :confused:

computerworks 10-24-2008 09:21 AM

...he is nowhere as pretty as Ned.

Ron61 10-24-2008 09:26 AM

1ntCobra,

Thanks for the information. I haven't spent a lot of time with mine yet and have just glanced through the index. I guess I should take some time and get familiar with it as I have spent most of my time reading about the Daytonas and Gt-40s.

Ron :)

REAL 1 10-24-2008 02:13 PM

Ah, yes. John, you do make me laugh now and then. :LOL:;)

Takes care.

"Baba Looey".

;)

CHANMADD 10-24-2008 07:17 PM

Semantic's
 
I usually try not to get involved in these types of "verbal banter" threads....but some times I cannot restrain myself...
"Real 1" ...I believe does not have a Cobra anymore???
I have built and helped many builds over the years and there are very many
varied types of Cobra owners....Some just want a Cobra because it looks good!.......Some because it's fast!.... Some because it's the ultimate MACHO
machine!.... And some because it cost the most!!!
The "REAL" Cobra ...I can guarantee you does not give the owner any more driving pleasure than the "cheap" replica does,...In fact the owner of the "REAL" one probably is so busy being the "Owner of the REAL one" that the pleasure part of it does not even matter!!:D

HI Cobra 10-24-2008 10:46 PM

Bet that red light is starting to blink now.:LOL:

Nedsel 10-24-2008 10:55 PM

Yes, I am familiar with the completion cars registry entry as it relates to "both" of the 3060 cars. I am also familiar with the car supposedly numbered 30601 by Brian Angliss, as this is not its first appearance at Barrett-Jackson; it was there several years ago and advertised as CSX 3060. What I question is the idea that Angliss built it in the 70's and actually numbered it 30601. I suspect it was originally built later than that, and was initially numbered 3060, and then had the 1 added to its VIN to differentiate it from the car that Shelby built through McCluskey as a completion car.

Jamo 10-25-2008 12:06 AM

Ned, what happens in Vegas...

Excaliber 10-25-2008 09:52 AM

If the BJ 3060 was not built by McC or Anglis that would justify the low sale price, which may be right on target for this car. That would also explain it's less than steller accuracy to original detail.

Question then becomes: WHO did build it? What alloy body might have been used for it's construction?

Nedsel 10-25-2008 10:06 AM

Jamo, we all know the Vegas slogan, but the SEMA show is coming up and it's a sure thing we'll all be reading about what was there in every automotive publication out there, as well as right here at CC. So I'm not sure everyone buys into that Vegas concept. Maybe it's supposed to be limited to what we do with all those, ah, handouts that the corner-workers thrust into your hands as you walk along the strip. You know - the ones that are advertising all kinds of body parts unrelated to automobiles.:JEKYLHYDE

REAL 1 10-28-2008 11:41 AM

We each no doubt strive to own that which gives us the most pleasure both in driving and ownership experience.

1ntCobra 10-28-2008 11:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nedsel (Post 892291)
Yes, I am familiar with the completion cars registry entry as it relates to "both" of the 3060 cars. I am also familiar with the car supposedly numbered 30601 by Brian Angliss, as this is not its first appearance at Barrett-Jackson; it was there several years ago and advertised as CSX 3060. What I question is the idea that Angliss built it in the 70's and actually numbered it 30601. I suspect it was originally built later than that, and was initially numbered 3060, and then had the 1 added to its VIN to differentiate it from the car that Shelby built through McCluskey as a completion car.

Now I'm more confused. I got the impression that 30601 was the fake CSX 3060 from the registry. Is the auction car not 30601, but yet a different fake CSX 3060?


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:34 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
The representations expressed are the representations and opinions of the clubcobra.com forum members and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and viewpoints of the site owners, moderators, Shelby American, any other replica manufacturer, Ford Motor Company. This website has been planned and developed by clubcobra.com and its forum members and should not be construed as being endorsed by Ford Motor Company, or Shelby American or any other manufacturer unless expressly noted by that entity. "Cobra" and the Cobra logo are registered trademarks for Ford Motor Co., Inc. clubcobra.com forum members agree not to post any copyrighted material unless the copyrighted material is owned by you. Although we do not and cannot review the messages posted and are not responsible for the content of any of these messages, we reserve the right to delete any message for any reason whatsoever. You remain solely responsible for the content of your messages, and you agree to indemnify and hold us harmless with respect to any claim based upon transmission of your message(s). Thank you for visiting clubcobra.com. For full policy documentation refer to the following link: