SB100 Sequence Number 2010499

[Dave V]

As many of you know I have been passing smog tests with my cobra for the last 5 years. When I was renewing the registration in 2005, the sequence numbers were gone on January 2nd and I had my paperwork completed in April so instead of parking the car for 9 months I took it to BAR and smogged it. It has passed every time since, three times. This year I took it in and the State has changed the passing scores. In 2005 I needed a CO level of 5 something to pass but to my surprise this year the passing CO level was 1.16. It is impossible to lean out the carburetor to meet this standard. I was told by the smog guy that the state has lowered all of the emission values in order to remove old cars from the road. I had to call Sacramento twice, go to DMV twice and much to my amazement there is still a sequence number left for 2010.

Any way no more smog tests for me and there is still one number left. If you have a 70's or 80's car that needs to be smogged, be aware that it is a whole new world in California and pretty soon it'll be impossible to meet the requirements.

Dave V

[kayakjack]

So they make rules stating cars have to meet emissions requirements that were not in effect when the car was made? Never heard of that before. Must be new. Hope it doesn't catch on.

Jack

[rustyBob]

Thas been happening ever since they started the whole smog check mess....
SB-100 baby the only way to go....

[kayakjack]

Originally Posted by rustyBob

Thas been happening ever since they started the whole smog check mess....
SB-100 baby the only way to go....

So, if you have a car actually made in 1965 (say a Cobra), you would have to get an SB-100 exemption? I thought SB-100 was for cars which do not meet the emissions rules in existence when the car was built.

I used to own a 1973 Lotus Europa. It met the emission rules in place in 1973. If I still owned it and lived in California, would I have to get an SB-100?

Jack

[Ron61]

Originally Posted by kayakjack

So, if you have a car actually made in 1965 (say a Cobra), you would have to get an SB-100 exemption? I thought SB-100 was for cars which do not meet the emissions rules in existence when the car was built.

I used to own a 1973 Lotus Europa. It met the emission rules in place in 1973. If I still owned it and lived in California, would I have to get an SB-100?

Jack

This law applies to all replicas and kit cars. At the present time, any real car made before 1974 is exempt from emission testing, but cars from 1975 up are going to have to meet much more stringent tests than they originally had to. If you have any car actually made in 1965, at this time at least you don't have to worry about smog testing.

Ron

[kayakjack]

Originally Posted by Ron61

This law applies to all replicas and kit cars. At the present time, any real car made before 1974 is exempt from emission testing, but cars from 1975 up are going to have to meet much more stringent tests than they originally had to. If you have any car actually made in 1965, at this time at least you don't have to worry about smog testing.

Ron

Not that anyone who writes laws in California is asking me, but this is really not "fair". I understand getting old junkers that are blowing smoke all over the place off the road. But telling people who own, say a perfect 1979 Ferrari 308 to comply with more stringent rules than were in effect when new, or get one of 500 SB-100 exemptions per year does not pass the smell test.

Like I said, they didn't ask me.

Jack

[Ron61]

Jack,

You can't get an SB-100 number on a real car. They are only for kit cars and replicas. And even they can't be turn key cars as yo have to have the engine and transmission at least installed by someone other than the dealer. Then you have to have every receipt for all of the work and everything when you go into the DMV. So a 1977 Ford, Chevy, or any other manufactured car isn't allowed to be registered using the SB-100 process. My neighbor who has a 2003 diesel Ford pick up had to take it in and have it smog tested last Summer. And they had never tested diesels here before.

Ron

[Dangerous Doug]

Congradulations on the SB-100---especially this late in the year.

DD

[Got the Bug]

Congrats Dave! It's the only way to go, and now you never have to worry about it again.

[rodneym]

Dave,
Your numbers in your post don't seem to jive with a smog test I had. Would you mind double checking the numbers and repost?
Thank you!

[PANAVIA]

Congrats Dave, Glad this worked out!

[wanab5150]

From what I understand,the rules are more stringent than before. For example, before the new law, there was a window your particular vehicle would have to fit into such as between 2.3 and 5.0 PPM (just an example). Now cars will have to meet the lower number with no latitude as before.

If you don't meet this minimum number, you are required to spend UP TOO $450 to repair the vehicle to meet the lower standards and if it still doesn't pass, apply for an exemption through the DMV referee.

Certain areas in Ca. like Sacramento are targeted due to the gross pollution. Some areas in La and others also , I can't remember which ones right now. The target is the top 15% of the gross polluters.

It sucks but were stuck with it................AND, congrats on the SB-100. 499....cool!

[Dave V]

First of all I got my number at 2:30 and numer 500 went at 4:00. They are all gone for 2010.
My numers when I was smogging:

Originally (1966) Idle Hc 700 Idle Co 5.5 2500 RPM CO 4.5
11/10/2006 Idle HC 700 Idle CO 5.5 2500 RPM CO 4.5 2500 RPM HC 600
11/24/2010 15 MPH HC 201 Co 1.3 NO 4.31 25 MPH HC 168 CO 1.1 NO 1174

Wow has the world changed. My car actually tested cleaner this year than previously but the State of California has changed the limits so that there is no way my engine could possibile pass. It is a 390 bored to about 416 CI with a carberator.

I am not sure how the State of California decided that old engines should be cleaner than they were manufactured to adhere to. Crazy, but they have cahged the limits for all years and that is why I was saying to beware if you have a 70's or 80's big bore, in California.

I talked to DMV 3 times today and am best freinds with both Sacramento and the local supervisor. I still have my number and they say I am good, but stay tunened, and as they say iit isn't over until the fat lady sings and they are both fat ladies.

Dave V

[rodneym]

Dave,
Thank you very much for reposting
But I don't understand...
What year was your Cobra registered as?
From what I understand, the only ways to put a 390 in ANYTHING in CA is to put it in something that never has to be smogged (I think 74 or older) or in an SB-100 car, which of course is a SPCN.

[ddewar]

In November I was issued exemption 2010483 for a new Backdraft Racing Cobra. I just compled Smog yesterday. I had a problem with the Smog Referee accusing me of a turn key vehicle. I had seperate purchase receipts for the vehicle and the engine, transmission. The problem was that the engine and transmission were installed at the same facility as the vehicle. This was still an issue although I had seperate receipt for both. The important thing is to keep the two items seperate.

[rodneym]

The Smog referee? Mine was handled by the DMV. I didn't thunk a referee would need to see anything other than your registration.

[ddewar]

Good question but in my case the referee took it upon himself to act as a secondary enforcer to determine if the car qualified to be smog exempt. I am finding in the registration process not everyone is knowledgeable of what needs to done and by whom.

[wanab5150]

Dave, do you still run the stock mufflers, smog pump (if applicable), heat risers, air cleaner, pvc, or same carb as the original 1966? That could be why it didn't pass. While I already know the answer, maybe with the original stuff on the motor it met the requirements.

Also curious if the car is registered as a Cobra or "Special Construction" and as what year. tom

[Dave V]

My understanding of the issue is that BAR, for no particular reason decided I needed to meet 1966 smog requirements. They figured that you had to have a SR100 niber to be smog exemt and the minimum requirements were 1966, Since I could meet those requirements I didn't argue since I didn't really know what year my engine was. The 1966 specs that I posted were per 1066 and I could meet those requirements, At some point, I'm guessing 2009 or 2010 the feds decided that old cars should be removed from the streets, thus cash for clunkers. In it's wisdom the State of California decided that they could do better and legilate old cars off the raods and not pay for it. It's very simple, just change the emmission standards for old cars and then they cann't smog. Most people don't keep their records so they will just think their car is less ifficient then 2 years ago. Very few reailze that they have been legislated out of owning clasic cars.

I have an SR 10 nubmer so no big deal. As I said people with 1070's and 1080's cars are the real victums because they do no thave have fall back like SR100.

Dave V