ERA 2136 Build Log

[marcalan]

Hi Tim,

For my car I built a 289 with modern internals but trying to stay period correct. With aluminum heads, roller cam and stock style valve covers. I had to buy a spacer for the roller rockers, this fit on top of the heads between the head and valve cover. I used the original crank. I had to use a 67 timing chain cover as the 64 -65 did not fit with the harmonic balancer I picked out. I also used the early style oil dipstick, they changed in 67 I believe. I did deviate from the original look with some after market March pulleys as I could not find a set that would line up appropriately. I even have an early style alternator case with new internals. My goal was to make the engine look period correct. The last item I need to change is the braided fuel line from the pump to the carb, I plan on modifying a steel line with the correct adapters.

So, it can be done, just have to pay attention to the little things that most folks won't even hone in on when they look at the motor.

[*13*]

Exactly what he said! If you're like a lot of you will start out being partially period correct & be obsessive about changing things over in time to become more period correct.

[Snakebit]

I used a 68 302 block stroked to 331. Look in my gallery. 289 or 302? The 68 block is a Windsor block. There was a shortage of 289 blocks so the stated using 302 blocks with 289 internals. The only person that will really know the difference is you. They usually don't get passed the Webers.

[tkb289]

Originally Posted by Snakebit

I used a 68 302 block stroked to 331. Look in my gallery. 289 or 302? The 68 block is a Windsor block. There was a shortage of 289 blocks so the stated using 302 blocks with 289 internals. The only person that will really know the difference is you. They usually don't get passed the Webers.

I took a look in your gallery ... you are right about the Webers ... they certainly attract a lot of attention, very cool

- Tim

[tkb289]

Originally Posted by marcalan

Hi Tim,

For my car I built a 289 with modern internals but trying to stay period correct. With aluminum heads, roller cam and stock style valve covers. I had to buy a spacer for the roller rockers, this fit on top of the heads between the head and valve cover. I used the original crank. I had to use a 67 timing chain cover as the 64 -65 did not fit with the harmonic balancer I picked out. I also used the early style oil dipstick, they changed in 67 I believe. I did deviate from the original look with some after market March pulleys as I could not find a set that would line up appropriately. I even have an early style alternator case with new internals. My goal was to make the engine look period correct. The last item I need to change is the braided fuel line from the pump to the carb, I plan on modifying a steel line with the correct adapters.

So, it can be done, just have to pay attention to the little things that most folks won't even hone in on when they look at the motor.

marcalan ...

What you and Hyde bring up is a good point about period correct, I could see how it could evolve into an obsession. I like the combination of the old school look, but with upgraded or more modern internal bits. The car itself is a perfect example ... a very stiff, well braced square tube chassis, wrapped in a very authentic looking body, the best of both worlds.

Which aluminum heads did you use?

Thanks.

- Tim