Finally,the presidential candidates summarized

[427 S/O]

You'll notice, when libs come up short with a come back in any debate, they resort to anger = insults.

[Wayne Maybury]

I worry that we are not going to leave as good a world for our children's children as we have lived in. Radical Muslims are the enemy and unfortunately, moderate Muslims can't or won't say/do anything about the radicals.

It seems to me that every Muslim woman I see between the age of 20 and 35 has a bunch of kids. That would indicate that they are multiplying like crazy and even if we cut off immigration, they will eventually outnumber the non-Muslims in North America as well as just about everywhere else in the world.

Look what has happened in many European countries that allowed and encouraged significant Muslim immigration over the past 20 or 30 years. Many of these countries have major Muslim populations that refuse to integrate and demand special treatment. Demark is a good example of a country that greeted Muslims with open arms only to have the Muslims turn on the country that welcomed them.

Wayne

[Cobrabill]

[quote=Wayne Maybury Radical Muslims are the enemy and unfortunately, moderate Muslims can't or won't say/do anything about the radicals.
Wayne[/QUOTE]

Bingo-and when this happens,you HAVE to treat them all like radicals.

[cobra de capell]

Originally Posted by 427 S/O

You'll notice, when libs come up short with a come back in any debate, they resort to anger = insults.

You know, some times playful 'insults' are deserving - also, in your case, your posts are so hugely unprepossessing lately - I'm thinking that perhaps other posters are starting to not view you as a member of the same species so they don't know how to respond. So, it's no one's fault, it a multi-generational thing between the Hominidae biological family (you) and Homo Sapiens. I'm sure you understand, it's not personal - it's the internet.

One thing is for sure - you are not only dull, you are the cause of dullness in others - not that there is necessarily anything wrong with that as we all make choices and have free will. Although, I'm not sure able Hominidae's.

[427 S/O]

Would (you) editing our post be satisfactory?. Just funnin'.

[Wayne Maybury]

Originally Posted by Cobrabill

Bingo-and when this happens,you HAVE to treat them all like radicals.

Bill, I am sorry to say that you are right. I have always taken pride in the fact that I make a serious attempt to treat every person as an individual, and not just a member of some ethnic or religious group. I am really having a difficult time doing that with Muslims as I see myself more and more viewing them as the enemy.

Wayne

[cobra de capell]

Originally Posted by Wayne Maybury

Bill, I am sorry to say that you are right. I have always taken pride in the fact that I make a serious attempt to treat every person as an individual, and not just a member of some ethnic or religious group. I am really having a difficult time doing that with Muslims as I see myself more and more viewing them as the enemy.

Wayne

As do I, perhaps due to the fact that those Muslims that are not out to kill us, assuming that there are some out there, are virtually silent and is some cases may be directly or indirectly supporting those that are out the kill us. It's another follow the money thing with more than a few Muslim countries with tons of extra money to spend and Allah to please.

[cobra de capell]

[427 S/O]

Watched 'what's in the Koran' the other night, The similarities with the bible is astonishing. Surprising that many of the brutal Muslim act's are not even in the Koran?.
They touched on different muslim sects, and if there was ever a book twisted to satisfy, it's the Koran. What I got from the show.... 'IF' all Muslims followed what's written in the Koran, we wouldn't be having these problems.

[VRM]

Originally Posted by cobra de capell

There is simply not sufficient people or families making $250K and up to pay for all of BO's programs - you had better hold onto your wallet....according to moneycentral - 75% of the households in the U.S. do not make $57,343 a year.

Given your thought procss, wouldn't you be happier is Venezula?

Also, some input from Larry Kudlow.....

"The Obama spend-o-meter is now up around $800 billion. And tax hikes on the rich won’t pay for it. It’s the middle class that will ultimately shoulder this fiscal burden in terms of higher taxes and lower growth.

This isn’t free enterprise. It’s old-fashioned-liberal tax, spend, and regulate. It’s plain ol’ big government. The only people who will benefit are the central planners in Washington.

Obama would like voters to believe that he’s the second coming of JFK. But with his unbelievable spending and new-government-agency proposals he’s looking more and more like Jimmy Carter. His is a “Grow the Government Bureaucracy Plan,” and it’s totally at odds with investment and business.

Obama says he wants U.S. corporations to stop “shipping jobs overseas” and bring their cash back home. But if he really wanted U.S. companies to keep more of their profits in the states he’d be calling for a reduction in the corporate tax rate. Why isn’t he demanding an end to the double-taxation of corporate earnings? It’s simple: He wants higher taxes, too.

The Wall Street Journal’s Steve Moore has done the math on Obama’s tax plan. He says it will add up to a 39.6 percent personal income tax, a 52.2 percent combined income and payroll tax, a 28 percent capital-gains tax, a 39.6 percent dividends tax, and a 55 percent estate tax.

Not only is Obama the big-spending candidate, he’s also the very-high-tax candidate. And what he wants to tax is capital."

The majority of families making under 250K would get a tax cut under Obamas tax plan. Some of those over 250K would also get a tax cut, some would stay the same, and most would go up.

McCains tax plan would also cut taxes for those under 250K, but not by anywhere near as much as Obamas plan. McCains plan would cut more taxes for those over 250K.

Putting more money back in peoples pockets is a good thing. I would rather put money back in the pockets of 95% than 5%. If 5% of the country goes and buys a Ford GT it is not going to be as big a boost to the economy as 95 % of the country going and buying a Focus. And the the 5% would get additional money from profits from stocks of companies doing well by selling the Focus to that 95%. It also can't be completely one sided, though, and Obama and McCain are two opposite ends. Both of their plans would add trillions to the deficit in order to pay for their respective pet projects.

Steve