Main Menu
|
Nevada Classics
|
Advertise at CC
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
CC Advertisers
|
|
09-05-2009, 06:10 AM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Cobra Make, Engine:
Posts: 95
|
|
Not Ranked
info on cams please
What is the main diff between a carb and weber cam? Is it easily explained? Thanks.
|
09-05-2009, 06:31 AM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: cleveland,
OH
Cobra Make, Engine: CSX4000, 427
Posts: 1,999
|
|
Not Ranked
Here's weber's own chart for correct sizing of their carbs, based on single cylinder displacement.
__________________
"After jumping into an early lead, Miles pitted for no reason. He let the entire field go by before re-entering the race. The crowd was jumping up and down as he stunned the Chevrolet drivers by easily passing the entire field to finish second behind MacDonald's other team Cobra. The Corvette people were completely demoralized."
|
09-05-2009, 07:04 AM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: San Francisco,
CA
Cobra Make, Engine: Cutting Edge Replicas, 427 World block SBF, TWM Injection
Posts: 309
|
|
Not Ranked
I've heard that the standard Carb cam is not recommended for EFI. Is the Webber cam the same as for the EFI? But back to the HP issue, assuming street driving and not needing WOT carb HP, which produces more low/mid range "streetable" HP - Webbers or stacked EFI? Is this the same for FE and SB?
__________________
Ron; SF_SN888KE
Cutting Edge Replicas 427
Shell Valley Daytona #27
|
09-05-2009, 11:06 AM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2001
Location: California,
Ca
Cobra Make, Engine: NAF 289 Slabside Early Comp Car with 289 Webers and all the goodies. Cancelling the efforts of several Priuses
Posts: 6,592
|
|
Not Ranked
If you can actually take yourself back to 1963 and the US Sports car racing scene imagine how the newly introduced Cobra was overtaking the normally victorious Corvette crowd, they didn't know what hit them. The Cobra was about a 1000 lbs lighter, that's very difficult to overcome with any reasonable amount of horsepower increase. The American racing circuits were for the most part comparatively short straights (Riverside excluded) accompanied by a series of turns. The main advantage the IDA's provide is a significant (about 20+%) increase in torque. The increase in throttle response is outstanding, this would consistantly put the Cobras quicker off the turns. Combined with their light weight and being faster off the turns they were destined for Glory. When you drive these cars it is the torque that presses you back in the seat, the car squirts forward like a pinched watermelon seed. It's the acceleration combined with the exhaust note that seduces us all. There are faster cars but none that make you feel the same. Torque wins races Horsepower sells engines.
__________________
Rick
As you slide down the Banister of Life, may the splinters never be pointing the wrong way
|
09-05-2009, 11:46 AM
|
Senior Club Cobra Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Cobra Make, Engine:
Posts: 15,712
|
|
Not Ranked
Point well taken Rick! Along those lines I would think a good Weber setup would work well on the street as well. Where low and mid range torque is the most common rpm range. Without consideration to price, or mpg, what is the down side for a street application?
From an mpg stand point it's as much about cruising range distance as it is about economics. I only have a 17 gallon tank! Even a slight improvement of mpg is a welcome relief from constantly having to watch the odometer or fuel gauge for my next gas stop!
|
09-05-2009, 01:58 PM
|
CC Member / Sponsor
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Provo,
UT
Cobra Make, Engine: Daytona Coupe
Posts: 1,356
|
|
Not Ranked
The pinnacle of carb development had to be the superbike engines of only a few years ago before they went EFI. They all ran IR manifolds...
For our Bonneville run I am sure we will run a single four. It is a lot funner to be running than tuning. Maybe after we get some salt under our nails...
|
09-05-2009, 02:40 PM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: E BRUNSWICK N.J. USA,
Posts: 3,841
|
|
Not Ranked
Camshafts
sdfletch Fletch weber or olberg carb don't like alot of over lap in the cam shaft and a wide LSA setup of the camshaft 112 is min. A 114LSA is better. A quick lift camshaft with quick high lobe design and closing. Super charger or turbo camshafts work better than straight carb motors. I don't have the answer for the EFI question but in my motor, it doesn't seam to care with a pro tuning of the EFI system. I do have a torque issue with TOO much from 2,000 rpms to 3,000 rpms. I need to advance the camshaft to kill a little of the low end power. The reversion problem with over lap cams have a serious effect on the vacuum sign that these carbs need to work the best. Higher vacuum signal the better, steadier too. If the intake valve and exhaust valve are open at the same time, this causes reversion in the intake and up to the carb. This is why you see some weber motors spitting or a mist around the intakes. There is alot more to it than this but would take about 2-3 hours for a full theory explaination. Bottom line, they work better than a carb in mid range. They make more torque, don't worry about more HP. Torque moves the car not hp from a standing start up to went the torque curve drops below the HP curve that is still climbing. Rick L.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:26 AM.
Links monetized by VigLink
|