Club Cobra Gas-N Exhaust  

Go Back   Club Cobra > Cobra Talk Areas > ALL COBRA TALK

MMG Superformance
Nevada Classics
Main Menu
Module Jump:
Nevada Classics
Nevada Classics
MMG Superformance
Advertise at CC
Banner Ad Rates
MMG Superformance
Keith Craft Racing
MMG Superformance
Keith Craft Racing
June 2024
S M T W T F S
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            
View Poll Results: Money aside, which chassis would you choose?
Original 4" Chassis with Original Tubular suspension 55 35.71%
Original 4" Chassis with Kirkham Billet Aluminum Suspension 33 21.43%
New Kirkham Billet Chassis with Billet Pushrod Suspension 54 35.06%
Original 3" Chassis with Leafspring Suspension 12 7.79%
Voters: 154. You may not vote on this poll

Kirkham Motorsports

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-05-2008, 11:08 AM
David Kirkham's Avatar
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery
Original Shelby Owner


 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Provo, Ut
Cobra Make, Engine: Kirkham, 427
Posts: 6,990
Not Ranked     
Default Original 4 inch vs. Billet Poll

Fellow Car Nuts:

We are having a friendly dispute here in the land of aluminum bodied Chariots of Fire. The question is, assuming the same price (which is a BIG assumption that would undoubtedly prove to be UNtrue, but humor me please)...

If you were to purchase a new Kirkham and had your choice of the old original 4" style chassis or the new billet aluminum chassis we are making for a customer (remember, assuming the same price) which would you rather have?

For those of you who don't know about the billet chassis, here is the link.

http://clubcobra.com/forums/showthre...d=85278&page=1

Thanks!

David
__________________
David Kirkham, President Kirkham Motorsports
Manufacturer Aluminum Body Kit Cars and supplier to Shelby* for their CSX4000, CSX7000, and CSX8000 289 and 427 Cobra
*Kirkham Motorsports is not affiliated with Ford or Carroll Shelby or any of their trademarks.
"Fear is the thief of dreams."
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-05-2008, 11:20 AM
Power Surge's Avatar
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Palm Coast, FL
Cobra Make, Engine: Shelby American CSX 4241 - authentically built
Posts: 2,573
Not Ranked     
Default

The billet chassis is neat, but I would not want it in my car.

Since I like originality in my Cobra, I prefer an original chassis with original style suspension.

But I feel the original style chassis with the billet suspension parts your now offer is the hot setup for the average guy.

What I WOULD like to see, is you build a steel 4" tube chassis that uses the pushrod suspension. THAT, is what I'd like to see.
__________________
Sal Mennella
CSX 4241, KMP 357 - sold and missed, CSX 4819 - cancelled, FFR 5132 - sold

See my car at CSXinfo.net here >> CSX 4241
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 06-05-2008, 11:34 AM
ENTDOC's Avatar
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Greenville,sc, SC
Cobra Make, Engine: Kirkham 427 (KMP 266); CAV GT40
Posts: 1,464
Not Ranked     
Default

original. The stainless option was acceptable but I would not buy one with a billet chassis.
__________________
SPF Daytona coupe 055, Roush 427R
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 06-05-2008, 11:39 AM
David Kirkham's Avatar
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery
Original Shelby Owner


 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Provo, Ut
Cobra Make, Engine: Kirkham, 427
Posts: 6,990
Not Ranked     
Default

ENTDOC,

Curiously, what don't you like about the billet chassis?

David
__________________
David Kirkham, President Kirkham Motorsports
Manufacturer Aluminum Body Kit Cars and supplier to Shelby* for their CSX4000, CSX7000, and CSX8000 289 and 427 Cobra
*Kirkham Motorsports is not affiliated with Ford or Carroll Shelby or any of their trademarks.
"Fear is the thief of dreams."
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 06-05-2008, 12:06 PM
RodKnock's Avatar
Senior Club Cobra Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Cobra Make, Engine: KMP 539, a Ton of Aluminum
Posts: 9,588
Not Ranked     
Default

What are the benefits, to the consumer, of the billet chassis over the original 4"?
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 06-05-2008, 12:11 PM
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Cobra Make, Engine: KMP
Posts: 790
Not Ranked     
Default

I am in the same boat with Entdoc. I like the period piece. My car isn't exactly like what was made in 1965, but it embodies the feel and spirit of what was available (although executed to a degree that is a million times better than the original). We have come a long way in the past 40+ years, but the compromises and short comings of the old design are part of the appeal for me.

That being said, my house is 150 years old, my newest motorcycle is older than my wife and I still think that the Rolling Stones are the greatest rock and roll band, so there is a pattern....
__________________
Lew

I'm no expert.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 06-05-2008, 12:26 PM
David Kirkham's Avatar
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery
Original Shelby Owner


 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Provo, Ut
Cobra Make, Engine: Kirkham, 427
Posts: 6,990
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RodKnock View Post
What are the benefits, to the consumer, of the billet chassis over the original 4"?
In theory (not proved until tested).

Aluminum chassis is on the order of 300% stiffer. It should handle much better.

The suspension has been significantly upgraded and tuned to the best we could make it.

CG of the billet chassis is moved back 2 inches. I know that doesn't sound like much, but that is about the same a small block is moved back from a big block. An aluminum small block with all the aluminum goodies (flywheel, water pump, etc.) is lighter than the old iron block and heads 289's of old.

Fianlly, no matter how you look at it, the aluminum chassis is pretty cool.

David
__________________
David Kirkham, President Kirkham Motorsports
Manufacturer Aluminum Body Kit Cars and supplier to Shelby* for their CSX4000, CSX7000, and CSX8000 289 and 427 Cobra
*Kirkham Motorsports is not affiliated with Ford or Carroll Shelby or any of their trademarks.
"Fear is the thief of dreams."
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 06-05-2008, 01:22 PM
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: penn.,
Posts: 2,556
Not Ranked     
Default

Seems like a waste of your machinery and talents, Cobras have been done everywich way already.Keep them vintage. you want to play with new tech, do something like a mosler, honeycomb samich chassis, new tech suspension, etc.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 06-05-2008, 01:48 PM
ENTDOC's Avatar
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Greenville,sc, SC
Cobra Make, Engine: Kirkham 427 (KMP 266); CAV GT40
Posts: 1,464
Not Ranked     
Default

David, for the same reason a JBL or Cutting Edge Cobra does not appeal to me. If I wanted the latest, greatest tech ,I would buy something on the order of RCR's SLC or similar. A cobra is a 60's car and a Kirkham( at least in its original design) embodies the best of that era in terms of duplication. I will compromise on modern brakes and better materials but not in execution or spirit.
__________________
SPF Daytona coupe 055, Roush 427R
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 06-05-2008, 02:01 PM
RodKnock's Avatar
Senior Club Cobra Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Cobra Make, Engine: KMP 539, a Ton of Aluminum
Posts: 9,588
Not Ranked     
Default

Lew, you made it through a post with the Kirkhams without asking about them making the MAGNESIUM WHEELS! Progress.

David, I don't know what is meant by "CG", but would the exterior design change at all? If an expert, and we have a lot of them here on CC, were to look only at up top (i.e., engine compartment, trunk, interior, etc.), not from underneath, then would the billet chassis make the exterior look different?

I'm inclined to vote to make the car better, and the frame appearance isn't as important to me, but I would want everything that's visual to the eye to look period correct or am I asking too much?
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 06-05-2008, 02:25 PM
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: May 2008
Cobra Make, Engine: Superformance #2589 Titanium w/ Indigo Blue Stripes 408/351w TKO600
Posts: 44
Not Ranked     
Default

As long as the car's exterior shape and look are kept then i think by all means suspension performance/technology should be pursued. How many times does anyone see the suspension on any cobra owner's vehicles? And if they did what would be at all disappointing about a suspension that uses new technology?

Why not make the car be able to better handle some 500hp when that is what is typically seen in these cars?

A billet aluminum chassis would impress anyone.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 06-05-2008, 02:32 PM
ENTDOC's Avatar
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Greenville,sc, SC
Cobra Make, Engine: Kirkham 427 (KMP 266); CAV GT40
Posts: 1,464
Not Ranked     
Default

a billet aluminum chassis would not impress me I assure you
__________________
SPF Daytona coupe 055, Roush 427R
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 06-05-2008, 02:37 PM
RodKnock's Avatar
Senior Club Cobra Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Cobra Make, Engine: KMP 539, a Ton of Aluminum
Posts: 9,588
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richie18 View Post
As long as the car's exterior shape and look are kept then i think by all means suspension performance/technology should be pursued. How many times does anyone see the suspension on any cobra owner's vehicles? And if they did what would be at all disappointing about a suspension that uses new technology?

Why not make the car be able to better handle some 500hp when that is what is typically seen in these cars?

A billet aluminum chassis would impress anyone.
I agree, that's what was attempting to say.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 06-05-2008, 02:41 PM
xlr8or's Avatar
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: San Diego, CA
Cobra Make, Engine:
Posts: 2,977
Not Ranked     
Default

David,
I think it will really depend on the intended purpose of the car. If the billet chassis and push rod suspension have greatly improved handling, those that track the car would appreciate it more than those who's primary use is on the street.

Why not take that billet chassis and make something new? Something that has better aerodynamics than a brick. Cobra's have a visceral, vintage appeal why screw that up?

Scott
__________________
Remember, It's never too early to start beefing up your obituary.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 06-05-2008, 02:42 PM
Sharroll Celby's Avatar
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Cobra Make, Engine:
Posts: 4,926
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richie18 View Post
As long as the car's exterior shape and look are kept then i think by all means suspension performance/technology should be pursued. How many times does anyone see the suspension on any cobra owner's vehicles? And if they did what would be at all disappointing about a suspension that uses new technology?

Why not make the car be able to better handle some 500hp when that is what is typically seen in these cars?

A billet aluminum chassis would impress anyone.
This sums up my feelings as well.


Would I be able to call my car a .........................COBRA? !!! lol !!!

I could deliver my Cobra lookalike thingy and you can practice building your billet stuff on my car. I will gladly pay you Tuesday for billet stuff TODAY!!! lol !!!
__________________
Of course it's REAL! You are NOT imagining it!

We don't want a bigger government; We want a government that does a few BIG things, and does them right.

If you think that you can cut it, if you think you got the time, they'll only give you one chance, better get it right first time. 'Cause in this game you're playin, if you lose you got to pay. And if you make just ONE wrong move, you'll get BLOWN AWAY!

Last edited by Sharroll Celby; 06-05-2008 at 02:44 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 06-05-2008, 02:46 PM
Joe Wicked's Avatar
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Lavon, TX
Cobra Make, Engine:
Posts: 3,008
Send a message via Yahoo to Joe Wicked
Not Ranked     
Default

CG is center of gravity.
__________________
Why do they call it "Common Sense" when it is so rare?
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 06-05-2008, 02:56 PM
jmarsey's Avatar
Senior Club Cobra Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: NorCal, CA
Cobra Make, Engine: A Blue Car
Posts: 949
Not Ranked     
Default

Good points being made here and there is more to it.

A pure design methodology would carry through the entire car, including the body, shape, wheel base, track, and all the bits, etc. In other words, why wrap a state of the art chassis with a period authentic 40+ year old wrapper? Why not carry your talented design sensibilities further to inform all aspects of the car?

On another note,
What most people misunderstand about the JBL is that it is not trying to be a cobra replica. It does resemble one but far from a replica. The car was designed all at once, meaning, Richard didn’t start with a cobra body and try to fit his ideology under it. The chassis was designed and a cobra styled body to fit it. Not everyone’s cup of tea but to me it’s a blend of styles and ideas that I can appreciate. But as I always tell folks, if I ever build a “cobra” it will be a Kirkham, period.

Incredible work David, as usual. I think your copper cobra was truly a pure expression of materials and methods. Quite beautiful too.

Talk soon, John :>
__________________
NASA - Instructor - 2012 TTA Champion - We Drive Harder!
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 06-05-2008, 02:58 PM
Igofastr's Avatar
Senior Club Cobra Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Granite Bay, Ca
Cobra Make, Engine: SPF GT40P-2265/393W, KMP318 (PROJECT!!!!!)/CSX478
Posts: 1,158
Not Ranked     
Default

David,

Original frame with original suspension.

If I'd have wanted a "modern" car, I'd have purchased one. I wanted a '60s era race car (a cobra), and Kirkham is as close to that as can be found.

Don't get me wrong, I think all the CNC work is neat, as are the technological upgrades. But to me, it makes no sense putting all of that in a dated body such as the cobra. If someone wants a modern racer, buy a Stohr DSR.

But hey, to each his own.
__________________
Ron R

"Dishwasher? I thought that was for cleaning parts!?"
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 06-05-2008, 03:02 PM
Igofastr's Avatar
Senior Club Cobra Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Granite Bay, Ca
Cobra Make, Engine: SPF GT40P-2265/393W, KMP318 (PROJECT!!!!!)/CSX478
Posts: 1,158
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmarsey View Post
Good points being made here and there is more to it.

A pure design methodology would carry through the entire car, including the body, shape, wheel base, track, and all the bits, etc. In other words, why wrap a state of the art chassis with a period authentic 40+ year old wrapper? Why not carry your talented design sensibilities further to inform all aspects of the car?

Talk soon, John :>
John, my point exactly.

I like your JBL too.
__________________
Ron R

"Dishwasher? I thought that was for cleaning parts!?"
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 06-05-2008, 03:08 PM
ENTDOC's Avatar
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Greenville,sc, SC
Cobra Make, Engine: Kirkham 427 (KMP 266); CAV GT40
Posts: 1,464
Not Ranked     
Default

I actually do understand what a JBL is, but of course if it resembled anything other than a cobra you would not be on this site, so it is a cobra of sorts. But , that is also my point. A kirkham with billet frame and push rod suspension exceeds my personal definition of a cobra, at that point it is a car that resembles a cobra. That is not what most people buy a Kirkham for, it is what everone that buys a JBL wants.
__________________
SPF Daytona coupe 055, Roush 427R
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
The representations expressed are the representations and opinions of the clubcobra.com forum members and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and viewpoints of the site owners, moderators, Shelby American, any other replica manufacturer, Ford Motor Company. This website has been planned and developed by clubcobra.com and its forum members and should not be construed as being endorsed by Ford Motor Company, or Shelby American or any other manufacturer unless expressly noted by that entity. "Cobra" and the Cobra logo are registered trademarks for Ford Motor Co., Inc. clubcobra.com forum members agree not to post any copyrighted material unless the copyrighted material is owned by you. Although we do not and cannot review the messages posted and are not responsible for the content of any of these messages, we reserve the right to delete any message for any reason whatsoever. You remain solely responsible for the content of your messages, and you agree to indemnify and hold us harmless with respect to any claim based upon transmission of your message(s). Thank you for visiting clubcobra.com. For full policy documentation refer to the following link: CC Policy
Links monetized by VigLink