 
Main Menu
|
|
Nevada Classics
|
|
Advertise at CC
|
| S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
| |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
| 7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
| 14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
| 21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
| 28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
CC Advertisers
|
|
02-04-2010, 03:36 PM
|
 |
Backdraft Racing Dealer
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: North Haven,
CT
Cobra Make, Engine: Backdraft Racing
Posts: 5,124
|
|
Not Ranked
There's only one company that can use the term authentic in regards to the body, and they are no longer in business...
|
02-04-2010, 03:41 PM
|
 |
Senior Club Cobra Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Cobra Make, Engine: KMP 539, a Ton of Aluminum
Posts: 9,592
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cashburn
There's only one company that can use the term authentic in regards to the body, and they are no longer in business...
|
Arntz? Contemporary? Hurricane? Ooops, they're back in business.  |
02-04-2010, 03:48 PM
|
 |
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Mooresville,
NC
Cobra Make, Engine: Factory Five chassis/Mr. Bruce slabside
Posts: 603
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cashburn
There's only one company that can use the term authentic in regards to the body, and they are no longer in business...
|
Puleeaassee, ERA is so much closer than the C word John O
__________________
jjo42
|
02-04-2010, 06:28 PM
|
 |
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 1,330
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cashburn
There's only one company that can use the term authentic in regards to the body, and they are no longer in business...
|
Jay,
I think what jmimac351 meant was, the more authentic body (meaning more authentic than the previous MKIII) on the new MKIV frame. At least that's the way I read it. |
02-04-2010, 07:32 PM
|
 |
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Apopka,
FL
Cobra Make, Engine: Building 289 Lemans / FFR mkIV chassis w/ Bruce Chervenak
Posts: 700
|
|
Not Ranked
Good grief.
Jay, fyi... I'll be down in Boynton in the next month or so to see my buddy Richard Bailey and visit with Reg Dodd about a TD car. I'd like another cobra and the TD car could fit a dual-purpose application of street and track car which could potentially take the place of my Panoz - and save space and $$$. The reason I am considering that is because Reg supports his product so well and the product is solid. Now this is coming from a guy who's made it pretty clear he's interested in a 289. Well, I have a decision to make on whether I want to go to the track more or have an..."authentic looking"  ... "cobra" more.
Your product is a lot different than what FFR is doing and I think caters to a totally different customer. I'm not sure why you are sniping in here with these comments but it's not the sort of thing I'd expect Reg to do, that's for sure.
Take it easy. |
02-04-2010, 09:09 PM
|
|
Backdraft Racing Dealer
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: North Haven,
CT
Cobra Make, Engine: Backdraft Racing
Posts: 5,124
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmimac351
Good grief.
Jay, fyi... I'll be down in Boynton in the next month or so to see my buddy Richard Bailey and visit with Reg Dodd about a TD car. I'd like another cobra and the TD car could fit a dual-purpose application of street and track car which could potentially take the place of my Panoz - and save space and $$$. The reason I am considering that is because Reg supports his product so well and the product is solid. Now this is coming from a guy who's made it pretty clear he's interested in a 289. Well, I have a decision to make on whether I want to go to the track more or have an..."authentic looking" ... "cobra" more.
Your product is a lot different than what FFR is doing and I think caters to a totally different customer. I'm not sure why you are sniping in here with these comments but it's not the sort of thing I'd expect Reg to do, that's for sure.
Take it easy. |
Yeah, take it easy  Thanks for explaining the product to me. I think you should read my comments again, I'm all for a new offering by FFR... if anything it has been too long. Keep reading and good luck with Reg and the TD car. |
02-04-2010, 09:44 PM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Apopka,
FL
Cobra Make, Engine: Building 289 Lemans / FFR mkIV chassis w/ Bruce Chervenak
Posts: 700
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cashburn
Yeah, take it easy Thanks for explaining the product to me. I think you should read my comments again, I'm all for a new offering by FFR... if anything it has been too long. Keep reading and good luck with Reg and the TD car. |
Jay, it's probably wiser for you to adopt the strategy that other manufacturers / representatives are employing with this topic and stay clear lest your intent be misconstrued - which obviously I have, right?
Best wishes. |
02-05-2010, 06:04 AM
|
|
Backdraft Racing Dealer
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: North Haven,
CT
Cobra Make, Engine: Backdraft Racing
Posts: 5,124
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmimac351
Jay, it's probably wiser for you to adopt the strategy that other manufacturers / representatives are employing with this topic and stay clear lest your intent be misconstrued - which obviously I have, right?
Best wishes.
|
You mean the same guys that stay clear when customers need assistance, guidance, or have issues to solve with their product? The beauty of this forum over the other one is it does not belong to any one manufacturer and is open for discussion with a lot less slant.
As for the claims on the body shape, that would be very easy to prove if you did in fact digitize the source body. So?
Standard IRS (what a car of this nature needs) would be a far greater feat. |
02-05-2010, 07:55 AM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 1,330
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cashburn
As for the claims on the body shape, that would be very easy to prove if you did in fact digitize the source body. So? |
You can still digitize a car and then make changes to fit your application. The great thing about today's modeling software is that it allows the user to tweek and not lose critical proportions. In other words, and as an example, If FFR needed to length the vertical space between the bottom of the door to the bottom of the sill to fit their frame mounting points, they could enlarge the entire area from the top of the door to the bottom of the sill and forward to the front wheel arch so they keep the relative shape and perspective and the changes become less notable.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cashburn
Standard IRS (what a car of this nature needs) would be a far greater feat.
|
You really believe that? You really believe that what they've been able to accomplished is far less of a feat than making IRS standard rather than optional? Nonsense. The same could be said about struts vs. A arms. Regardless, I believe the FFR Spec series still require solid axle.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cashburn
You mean the same guys that stay clear when customers need assistance, guidance, or have issues to solve with their product? The beauty of this forum over the other one is it does not belong to any one manufacturer and is open for discussion with a lot less slant.
|
The additional beauty of this forum is that you can quickly distinguish between those who have first hand experience and those that may be biased for one reason or another.
I guess the Fall Foliage Cruise won't be including FFRs any longer. 
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:48 AM.
Links monetized by VigLink
|
Hybrid Mode
