Why does every thread here devolve into a "Real" vs. "Replica" argument?

[RodKnock]

Originally Posted by REAL 1

As TwoShelby's notes even an "orange" could understand the issue. The Registry and even Hemming's accepts those facts. But you see for "them" its about childish insults (because that really all they have to work with) and deprecating something they don't own so they feel better about what they do own.

No one reads or cares about Hemmings. It's the Betamax of magazines. Why not read an auction and investing magazine such as Keith Martin's Sports Car Market. They state it's a replica.

The Registry refers to your car as a "true replica" and "Cobra-like." No point has been proven by you because LOGIC tells me that a car that clones an original is a copy, REPLICA. You have admitted it's a replica, the Registry refers to it as a replica, the SAAC Cobra Registrar states it's a replica. REPLICAS cannot be genuine, real or authentic. LOGIC, baby.

As for INSULTS, as far as I can tell, you're the only one insulting people with comments like calling people "oranges" or "jackasses." And you should stop. Oh, except when Ned Scudder, the SAAC Cobra Registrar called you the following:

Originally Posted by Nedsel

For everyone's benefit, stop being such an arrogant and touchy twit.....

Hmmm. Interesting. Who makes this site look bad? Who's being childish?

Originally Posted by REAL 1

Even on the other threads where I posted the SAAC statements and Hemming's vis a vis the Continuation Cobras....was posting searchable threads on the Continuation Cobras vis a vis SAAC's position and Hemmings buyers guide for any researching the issue. But of course they "scurried" over there to carry their juvenile antics over to those threads too. They already have this "sticky" thread to play in. Why they needed to comment over there who knows?

I have received PMs from Continuation owners commenting on what "jackasses" these guys are. I didn't say it others did. I agree though.

Watch, they'll be back here in short order tripping over each other to make more insulting comments and misguided "arguments" including calculations of percentages of "authenticity. Comical really.

Evan, seriously, you're the person who started 2-3-4 additional threads on the same topic. You, not anyone else. You seem to be the only person who's insulting others. You, not anyone else. The SAAC Cobra Historian called you "arrogant touchy twit", so it's you, not anyone else.

And for those continuation owners who support you, but choose not to stand up and be counted here, I think that's wonderful, but it doesn't change my mind. We all know it's a REPLICA built by a successor company 30-50 years later using different materials. A component or KIT car that must be completed after sale by other humans and then given an exemption to be driven on the roads today with no warranty as a specially constructed vehicle. The original Cobra, built in the 1960's, was driven off a dealer's lot with warranty and register-able in all 50 States, exemption and inspections not needed. That can't be done today with the modern Shelby Cobra replica.

Evan, I'll continue to post here as long as you post your BS. And I'm very happy that you have your "minions" and they provide you comfort and make you feel better about yourself and your position.

Whoop-Dee-Doo. Like I really care about your visible "minions" like Tony (TwoBJShelbys) or your invisible "minions."

I'll continue to post, don't you worry. I'm staying right here every step of the way. But I won't trip over myself, since my core is rock solid from squats, snatches, DL's, HSPU's, MU's, GHD's, etc.